consult
Skill1 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
Short alias for the Forgeflow consultation workflow that produces an implementation brief before coding.
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- fjwood69/moritheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- natb1/commons.systemstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- natb1/CanonDBtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- alimohammadiamirhossein/deputytheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarmtheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- meowdiocre/meowpitheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use discover, init and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
anombyte93Skilldiscover
Phase 1 of the prd-taskmaster pipeline: brainstorm-driven discovery. Delegates to superpowers:brainstorming in Interactive Mode (one adaptive question at a time), or self-brainstorms in Autonomous Mode when no user is present. Intercepts before the brainstorming chain hands off to writing-plans — this skill owns the exit. Extracts constraints, calibrates scale (Solo / Team / Enterprise), and advances the pipeline to GENERATE.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillinit
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 5 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstatus
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillcouncil
Convene the persona panel — six orthogonal review lenses — on a target. Cold independent fan-out, debate-to-consensus, synthesized verdict with recorded dissent and a roster manifest.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 518same name
- ansari-project/codev★ 298same name
- cluesmith/codev★ 298same name
- raine/consult-llm-mcp★ 148same name
- fjwood69/mori★ 32same name
- jamillazarev/multica-ops★ 11same name
- Reef123/OpenVera★ 9same name
- meowdiocre/meowpi★ 3same name
- alimohammadiamirhossein/deputy★ 2same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/forgeflow-lean.mdcCursor rule
- aegis-verifySkill
- agent-chat-offSkill
- agent-chat-onSkill
- auditSkill
- create-agentSkill
- debateSkill
- discussSkill
- forgeflow-capabilitiesSkill
- forgeflow-consultSkill
- forgeflow-implementSkill
- forgeflow-research-divergence-adviceSkill
- forgeflow-research-divergence-evalSkill
- forgeflow-reviewSkill
- forge-reviewSkill
- implementSkill
- planSkill
- quickSkill
- researchSkill
- shipSkill
- taskSkill
- update-forgeflowSkill
- verifier-verifySkill
- forgeflow-auditSkill
- forgeflow-capabilitiesSkill
- forgeflow-implementSkill
- forgeflow-lean-auditSkill
- forgeflow-lean-debtSkill
- forgeflow-lean-primeSkill
- forgeflow-lean-reviewSkill
- forgeflow-leanSkill
- forgeflow-planSkill
- forgeflow-research-divergence-adviceSkill
- forgeflow-reviewSkill
- forgeflow-shipSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Use this skill when the user wants Forgeflow consultation before implementation.
- Distinctive: line 21
Before other work, run:
- Distinctive: line 28
Read the canonical consultation skill and follow its complete workflow, including consultation routing.
- Distinctive: line 29
Use its smallest relevant specialist set, risk/uncertainty escalation, and Architect synthesis.
- Very specific: line 31
If both this alias and forgeflow-consult are available, treat them as equivalent.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- forgeflow-capability-selection:start -->Automatic capability selection
Resolve select-capabilities.js from the checkout scripts/forgeflow, a host-supplied plugin root, or the installed ForgeFlow runtime for this host. Run node <helper-dir>/select-capabilities.js --guide and follow the shared selection procedure with phase consult and the current objective, criteria and affected scope. Reuse the same result across alias handoffs and pass it through existing context construction; do not reset reassessment limits. Missing runtime support is an explicit limitation, not a reason to invent selection results. Preserve current workflow read-only and isolation boundaries. Planned capabilities are not executable and selection grants no new authority.
<!-- forgeflow-capability-selection:end -->At workflow entry, run node <helper-dir>/open-session-dashboard.js --root <project-root> --workflow consult when available. Resolve <helper-dir> from the checkout's scripts/forgeflow first, then ${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/forgeflow/scripts/forgeflow. The helper starts or reuses agent-chat and reports known workflow phases on each entry; it uses CODEX_THREAD_ID, CLAUDE_SESSION_ID, or FORGEFLOW_SESSION_ID to open the local dashboard once per session. If the host supplies a session id separately, pass --session <host-session-id>; never invent a new id per invocation. Headless runs and FORGEFLOW_DASHBOARD_AUTO_OPEN=off skip the launch. A missing helper or unavailable browser must not block the workflow. Report actual phase transitions, significant progress, waiting, and the final result with node <runtime-root>/services/agent-chat/client.js activity <state> "<short label>" (<runtime-root> is the checkout or installed forgeflow directory). Use complete only when work and required checks have finished; report failed for failures, and never invent progress to keep Ember moving.
Delegate to the forgeflow-consult workflow.
Use this skill when the user wants Forgeflow consultation before implementation.
Resolve helpers before running them: set FORGEFLOW_HELPER_DIR to scripts/forgeflow when that directory exists, otherwise to ${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/forgeflow/scripts/forgeflow. If neither exists, report a missing Codex runtime installation.
Before other work, run:
"$FORGEFLOW_HELPER_DIR/ensure-forgeflow-state.sh"Workflow:
- Read the canonical consultation skill and follow its complete workflow, including consultation routing. If the canonical skill is unavailable, report the missing instructions instead of inventing a separate route.
- Use its smallest relevant specialist set, risk/uncertainty escalation, and Architect synthesis. This alias does not require all four consultants or skip independent validation and final review.
If both this alias and forgeflow-consult are available, treat them as equivalent.
Task evidence continuity
Use the shared task workflow for a bounded change with an accepted objective or brief. Resolve task.js from the same runtime helper directory used above. Run list --root <project-root> and reuse only the task explicitly selected by the user or matching the current objective and scope. Do not attach an unrelated task based only on recency. If this is a new accepted change, create a task using its objective and behavioral acceptance criteria; the task workflow describes the JSON contract.
Keep the same task id across consult, implement, review and ship. Use check for actual validation commands and saved evidence for observed manual/reviewer results. Record a checkpoint at each completed phase and before interruption, including the actual host/session identity when available. A saved plan, successful build, or reviewer verdict alone must not mark every criterion verified. Waivers require explicit user intent and a reason.
Before reporting completion or preparing a shipping handoff, read status --root <project-root> --task <id>. Stale/missing/failed criteria and pending actions remain visible. Reconcile interrupted actions from actual evidence, then use resume; never silently replay unknown work. Legacy work without task records stays supported but has no source-bound task completion claim. All remote authorization rules above still apply.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

