audit
Skill4 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Blueprint audit — run the consistency-check roster over an imported blueprint (gaps, jargon, channel conflicts, KPI drift, ownership, value dead-ends, hidden fees), recording findings ranked by impact and effort; re-run the checks, or dismiss or resolve a finding. Building → ub:map; hypothetical changes → ub:whatif.
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- patrickjaja/claude-desktop-extratheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- authrain-cloud-abdullahformuli/unsloptheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- oberemokis/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- Come-In-Labs/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- 5uck1ess/devkittheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- Nbill27/academic-writing-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use delight, teach-impeccable and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
HK-hubSkilldelight
Add moments of joy, personality, and unexpected touches that make interfaces memorable and enjoyable to use. Elevates functional to delightful. Use when the user asks to add polish, personality, animations, micro-interactions, delight, or make an interface feel fun or memorable.
Also in 32 projects that use this
HK-hubSkillteach-impeccable
One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.
Also in 19 projects that use this
zwy123zwySkillnormalize
将用户随意输入的提示词规范化为结构清晰、便于大模型执行的标准化提示词。适用于需要整理、统一提示词格式时调用。
Also in 19 projects that use this
SkillPilotCHSkilllevel-up
Eine Automatisierung pro Woche finden, scopen, shippen. Output landet als proposed-Eintrag in cadence.md mit konkreten Implementations-Schritten.
Also in 12 projects that use this
ww-w-aiSkillpm-discovery
PM Agent Team - Automated product discovery, strategy, and PRD generation. Runs PM analysis workflow to produce comprehensive PRD before PDCA Plan phase.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from HK-hub
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- ccch1mneyyy/dsh-Go★ 24ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- ccch1mneyyy/dsh-TUI★ 7.8ksame name
- macro-inc/macro★ 6.3ksame name
- yournextstore/yournextstore★ 5.5ksame name
- gadievron/raptor★ 4ksame name
- alchemy-run/alchemy★ 1.9ksame name
- alchemy-run/alchemy-effect★ 1.9ksame name
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodal★ 1.5ksame name
- jsmastery-pro/skills★ 1.4ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 176 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 36
Playbook gating: read references/audit-playbook.md before executing any route.
- Distinctive: line 124
Read, Glob, Grep, Bash.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 176 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Blueprint Audit
A blueprint that is merely valid can still be wrong: a lane nobody
staffs, a step customers experience but no cell records, a fee the journey
never shows. The audit runs a fixed roster of checks — each a written
interrogation, each executed by a fresh-context auditor — and lands the
results as audit_findings rows a human can triage. The audit never fixes
anything: it points at cells by key, and rates each finding three ways —
severity (how wrong it is), impact (how much fixing it matters to the
service) and effort (how much work the fix takes) — so the report can say
what to fix first.
Paths resolve against the plugin root (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} in Claude Code) or the workspace root, per AGENTS.md.
Entry-state detection (do this first)
| Entry state | Route |
| No workspace / no IR | Stop. Nothing to audit — that is the ub:map skill's job |
| IR exists, no DB reachable | Audit the IR files directly; audit/findings-report.json is the ledger (playbook §1 route substrate) |
| Imported blueprint, DB reachable | Full run: roster → auditors → dedupe → findings rows |
| "Audit just scenario X" | Same pipeline, cell universe scoped to that scenario's keys |
| "Dismiss / resolve finding X" | Triage route — status change only, playbook §4. Never re-run checks to honor a triage ask |
| Re-run after edits | Full run; supersede semantics below make it safe |
| "Add a new check" | Author a skills/audit/references/check-*.md from the template in playbook §5, then run it alone once before adding it to the roster |
Row precedence when the first three could overlap: DB reachability decides (credentials present AND the target answers) — per-scenario draft status never changes the route, only lands as a staleness note in the report.
Playbook gating: read references/audit-playbook.md before executing
any route. It carries the run semantics, the fingerprint algorithm, the
triage rules, and the check-authoring template.
Hard rules
- ⚠ REQUIRED — the audit's only writes are
audit_findingsrows (insert, update, its own check's supersede); humans changestatus. Fixing what it finds is a separate, confirmedub:mappass. - ⚠ REQUIRED — one fresh-context auditor per check, blind. Each
agents/auditor.mddispatch gets ONE check doc and the blueprint export, and never sees other checks' output. Cross-check synthesis happens in the main context after all auditors return. - ⚠ REQUIRED — dedupe by fingerprint through
audit_tools.py dedupe(playbook §2–§3); dismissed stays dismissed. - ⚠ REQUIRED — per-check atomic supersede. A check that completes replaces its own previous open findings in one transaction; a check that fails leaves its previous findings untouched. Never wipe the whole run's findings up front.
- ⚠ REQUIRED — no verbatim excerpts in a summary. Findings are read by every signed-in account and travel into shared docs. Cite cell keys and titles; never paste evidence text, proposition figures, or interviewee words.
- ⚠ REQUIRED — confirm the import target before any DB write;
references/adapter-contract.mdapplies unchanged — wrong-project protection. (Vacuous on the no-DB route — no DB write ever happens there, so there is no target to hunt for.)
The pipeline
imported blueprint (or IR files)
→ roster (enumerate skills/audit/references/check-*.md; skips decided HERE and
only here — rules in playbook §1.5, every skip reported)
→ export (one read-only blueprint export the auditors share —
skills/audit/scripts/audit_tools.py export)
→ dispatch (one auditor per check, parallel, blind)
→ collect (findings JSON per check; validate each auditor's output
against the findings-row shape pinned in agents/auditor.md
BEFORE any dedupe or `report --apply` — `audit_tools.py
validate`; a finding missing its severity, impact or effort
is malformed output = check failed, re-dispatch once, then
report the check as failed)
→ dedupe (audit_tools.py dedupe, playbook §3)
→ write (one run_id for the run; per-check atomic supersede)
→ report (open findings in priority order — Do first, Plan, Quick
wins, Later, playbook §3.5 — then per-check counts +
skipped checks + failed checks; nothing silent)The check roster
One file per check, skills/audit/references/check-<name>.md. Wave 1 needs only core
blueprint data; wave 2 reads the spec columns and skips gracefully —
reported, never silent — when they are absent or empty.
The table below is illustrative — the roster is the directory listing
(skills/audit/references/check-*.md, enumerated at roster time). A check
file that exists runs (or is reported skipped) whether or not a row here
mentions it.
| Wave | Check | Asks |
| 1 | gap-sweep | Which experienced moments have no cell — empty stretches, dangling dependencies, uncovered steps |
| 1 | jargon-lint | Which customer-facing cell texts use words the customer would never say |
| 1 | channel-conflict | Where do simultaneous cells compete for the same actor or channel |
| 1 | obsolete-source | Which cells model a surface or flow the mapped source no longer has (conditional on source access — playbook §1.5) |
| 2 | kpi-alignment | Do lane KPIs reward what the cells actually do (lane kpis/tools) |
| 2 | perceived-owner | Where the recorded owner and the perceived owner diverge (owner pair) |
| 2 | value-ledger | Which cells deliver value to nobody, and which audiences receive none (value_props) |
| 2 | fee-visibility | Where money changes hands invisibly to the customer journey |
Deterministic exit conditions
| Phase | Exit condition |
| Roster | Every check-*.md either dispatched or reported skipped-with-reason |
| Collect | Every dispatched check returned valid findings JSON or is reported failed after one retry |
| Write | Rows for this run_id = deduped findings; open-fingerprint index reports zero conflicts; per-check supersede left no orphaned open findings from prior runs of completed checks |
| Idempotence | Running twice on an unchanged blueprint yields zero new rows the second time; a re-run whose only change is a rating updates the open finding instead of adding one |
| Triage | The named finding's status changed and nothing else did |
| Report | Printed checklist: the open findings grouped Do first / Plan / Quick wins / Later (audit_tools.py rank on the file ledger; list_findings already returns that order on the canvas), then per-check found/skipped/failed counts and the run_id — never silent |
Agents
auditor— one check doc + the blueprint export in; findings JSON out (check, severityinfo|warn|critical, impact and effortlow|medium|high, cell keys, summary). Blind to other checks. Tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash.impact-tracer— its Method is the walk thechannel-conflictauditor runs itself when a chain is unclear.
References
| Read when | File |
| Doing anything in this skill | references/audit-playbook.md |
| Executing a specific check | skills/audit/references/check-<name>.md |
| Anything touching an import target | references/adapter-contract.md |
| Understanding the findings table | references/data-model.md |
| Naming lanes/actors while reading | references/lane-vocabulary.md |
| How the same audit behaves on the app canvas (dedupe spaces, canonical dedupe row) | references/canvas-adapter.md |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

