audit
Skill734 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Full review of the claude-desktop-extra project - patches vs the official Linux .deb (still needed? new ones needed? did the surrounding code change?), docs accuracy, Linux compatibility across the distro/session matrix, and runtime logs. Orchestrates a team of sub-agents and produces a consolidated report with solution approaches.
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Laucked-Security/claude-oswetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sanmidable/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alegauss/claude-traytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ansvisor/ansvisortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MammadovEshgin/clean-code-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use delight, teach-impeccable and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
HK-hubSkilldelight
Add moments of joy, personality, and unexpected touches that make interfaces memorable and enjoyable to use. Elevates functional to delightful. Use when the user asks to add polish, personality, animations, micro-interactions, delight, or make an interface feel fun or memorable.
Also in 32 projects that use this
HK-hubSkillteach-impeccable
One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.
Also in 19 projects that use this
zwy123zwySkillnormalize
将用户随意输入的提示词规范化为结构清晰、便于大模型执行的标准化提示词。适用于需要整理、统一提示词格式时调用。
Also in 19 projects that use this
SkillPilotCHSkilllevel-up
Eine Automatisierung pro Woche finden, scopen, shippen. Output landet als proposed-Eintrag in cadence.md mit konkreten Implementations-Schritten.
Also in 12 projects that use this
ww-w-aiSkillpm-discovery
PM Agent Team - Automated product discovery, strategy, and PRD generation. Runs PM analysis workflow to produce comprehensive PRD before PDCA Plan phase.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from HK-hub
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- ccch1mneyyy/dsh-TUI★ 7.2ksame name
- macro-inc/macro★ 6ksame name
- yournextstore/yournextstore★ 5.5ksame name
- gadievron/raptor★ 4ksame name
- alchemy-run/alchemy★ 1.9ksame name
- alchemy-run/alchemy-effect★ 1.9ksame name
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodal★ 1.5ksame name
- jsmastery-pro/skills★ 1.4ksame name
- nateherkai/AIS-OS★ 1.4ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- 3pSkill
- architectureSkill
- check-issueSkill
- check-prSkill
- commentSkill
- debugSkill
- deploySkill
- fresh-upstreamSkill
- linuxSkill
- test-nativeSkill
- updateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 175 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
Use the AskUserQuestion tool (not limited to 4) whenever a finding needs the user's call.
- Very specific: line 14
Ensure a fresh unpatched upstream extract exists for patch comparison: if ./tmp/app.asar.contents/.vite/build/index.js is missing or older …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 175 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Audit - orchestrated project review
You are the coordinator. Spawn a team of sub-agents to review in parallel, then synthesize ONE report. Run from the repo root. $ARGUMENTS may scope the audit (e.g. "cowork only", "patches only"); default = full.
Use the AskUserQuestion tool (not limited to 4) whenever a finding needs the user's call. Read /architecture and /linux context first if unsure of the domain.
Pre-flight (you do this before fan-out)
- Ensure a fresh unpatched upstream extract exists for patch comparison: if
./tmp/app.asar.contents/.vite/build/index.jsis missing or older than today, run/fresh-upstream(or tell the user and run the manual .deb crack + asar flow). Patches must be judged against the true current upstream, not a stale extract. - Note
.upstream-versionvs the highest version in the official apt Packages index. Check~/.config/Claude/logs/exists for the log workstream.
Fan out - spawn these workstreams as parallel agents (Explore/general-purpose)
Give each agent the project path, the fresh-extract path, and ask for findings + file:line evidence + a recommended action, not file dumps.
- Patches vs upstream. For each
patches/*/*.nim: does its target still exist in the fresh./tmpbundle? Run./scripts/validate-patches.sh ./tmp/app.asar.contentsand report pass/fail. For failures, classify: pattern renamed / code refactored / feature removed / feature upstreamed (→ needs regression guard). Flag patches that may be vestigial (target gone, no longer needed) and gaps (new darwin/win32 gates with no Linux patch - diffprocess.platformold vs new). VerifyEXPECTED_PATCHESstrictness + no false-success idempotency (AGENTS.md Rule 6). - Docs accuracy. Cross-check
baseline/CLAUDE_FEATURE_FLAGS.md,CLAUDE_BUILT_IN_MCP.md,ION.md,PLATFORM_GATE_BASELINE.md,README.mdpatch table, andAGENTS.mdagainst the actual current bundle + patches. Flag stale minified names, wrong counts, removed features still documented. (ReadCHANGELOG.mdhead only: offset 1, limit 60.) - Linux compatibility. Walk the support matrix (X11, Wayland-wlroots, Wayland-GNOME, Wayland-KDE, XWayland) × (Arch/Ubuntu/Debian/Fedora/RHEL/NixOS/Jetson, x86_64+aarch64). Check input (
js/cu_linux_executor.js,executor_linux.js) + screenshot cascades still cover each session, the glibc floor (2.34 overall; kwin-portal-bridge 2.39) holds, launcher session detection is sound. Surface edge cases (ydotoold version, Niri, immutable distros, sandboxed/portal identity). - Cowork backend (bundled native VM). Cowork runs on the
.deb's bundled native VM backend (cowork-linux-helper + virtiofsd + smol-bin + QEMU/OVMF; the local VM requires/dev/kvm; cloud Cowork needs only a keyed device, see Settings -> Extra -> Cowork (Linux)). The oldclaude-cowork-serviceGo daemon is deprecated and out of scope. Verify the Cowork-relatedpatches/*/*.nimstill match their targets in the fresh./tmpbundle and that any regression guards still assert the upstreamed behavior. Flag drift against the current bundle. - Runtime logs (if present). Scan
~/.config/Claude/logs/{main,cowork_vm_node,mcp,claude.ai-web}.logfor errors/exceptions, permission denials, dispatch bridge issues (DISPATCH-FWD/DISPATCH-TRANSFORM), and renderer crashes.cowork_vm_node.logis the bundled backend's Electron-side log (still valid). Defer deep dispatch/cowork debugging to/debug.
Synthesize (you, after agents return)
Produce a report:
- Summary table: workstream → status (clean / needs attention / broken) → headline finding.
- Patches: vestigial (removable), at-risk (pattern drift), gaps (new Linux opportunities), each with file:line + recommended action.
- Docs: what's stale + the exact fix.
- Linux matrix: any session/distro/arch combo at risk.
- Logs: notable errors + likely cause.
- Solution approaches: ranked, with effort estimate. Use
AskUserQuestionfor any decision (delete a patch? add one? change behavior per backend?). When findings amount to upstream drift (stale patterns, new gates, protocol mismatch), the remediation path is/update- point there for the structured fix workflow.
Cross-reference memory (~/.claude/projects/-home-patrickjaja-development-claude-desktop-extra/memory/) for prior decisions before recommending changes. This is read-only review - propose, don't apply (unless the user then asks).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

