agentleFS
BenkapnerBenkapner/claude-code-basecamp/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md

brainstorming

Skill17 starsChanged 59 days agoMITView on GitHub

User asks for design, planning, or approach exploration before implementation. Covers new features, components, refactors, or architecture decisions. Creates design docs and proposes approaches with trade-offs.

190 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • ryanportfolioSkill

    addskill

    Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ryanportfolioSkill

    apply-firmware

    Bring current folder (plain folder, existing repo, old or partial firmware copy) up to full Harness Firmware in place. Mirror external repo → adopt-repo.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
  • +6 more from ryanportfolio

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 170 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When triggered, present a design before implementation.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Don't propose unrelated refactoring

    line 38

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 170 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Brainstorming — Design Exploration

Turn ideas into fully formed designs through collaborative dialogue.

When triggered, present a design before implementation. The design scales to complexity: short (few sentences) for simple tasks, detailed (pages) for architectural changes. Always get approval before proceeding to code.

When to Activate

  • User explicitly asks: "design this", "how should i build", "what's the approach", "plan this out"
  • User describes a feature/component/refactor and asks for guidance before coding
  • User wants to explore trade-offs or multiple approaches to a problem

Process

  1. Explore context — check relevant code files, docs, recent commits
  2. Ask clarifying questions — one at a time, prefer multiple choice, understand: purpose, constraints, success criteria, scope
  3. Propose 2-3 approaches — name each, describe trade-offs, state your recommendation
  4. Present design — scale to complexity (1-2 sentences for trivial, multiple sections for architecture), ask approval after each section
  5. Get approval — wait for user buy-in before writing code

Design Principles

  • One question at a time — don't overwhelm
  • YAGNI ruthlessly — remove unnecessary features
  • Design for isolation — break into units with one purpose, well-defined interfaces, independently testable
  • Explore alternatives — always 2-3 approaches, with trade-offs
  • Scope check — if request spans multiple subsystems, decompose first

In Existing Codebases

  • Explore current structure and patterns before proposing changes
  • Include targeted fixes only if they block the current goal
  • Don't propose unrelated refactoring

Output

Present design as prose (short or detailed based on complexity), then ask: "Does this look right?" Wait for approval before proceeding to implementation.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.