ymyl-analyzer
Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Analizuje treść pod kątem YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) według Search Quality Rater Guidelines Google (edycja wrzesień 2025): klasyfikuje, czy temat jest YMYL i w której kategorii, audytuje element po elemencie zgodność z wymaganiami dla stron YMYL (6 wymiarów, wykrywanie wielu branż naraz) i proponuje konkretne poprawki. Trzy tryby: klasyfikacja / audyt / poprawki (bez argumentu - pełny pipeline). ZAWSZE używaj tego skilla gdy użytkownik mówi: "czy to jest YMYL", "sprawdź pod YMYL", "analiza YMYL", "audyt YMYL", "czy ten tekst podpada pod YMYL", "wymagania Google dla treści medycznych/finansowych/prawnych/ubezpieczeniowych", "quality rater guidelines", "SQRG", "czy Google uzna to za temat wrażliwy", "jaki poziom EEAT obowiązuje ten temat", "co poprawić, żeby spełnić kryteria YMYL", "czy mogę o tym pisać bez eksperta". Używaj też gdy użytkownik wkleja tekst o zdrowiu, finansach, ubezpieczeniach, prawie, bezpieczeństwie, wyborach lub zakupach i pyta o jakość, ryzyko albo zgodność z wytycznymi Google.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-auditSkill
- fact-checkerSkill
- hookiSkill
- humanizacja-checkSkill
- humanizacjaSkill
- humanizeSkill
- knowledge-graphSkill
- model-biznesowySkill
- od-zera-do-zleceniaSkill
- stylometriaSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.