agentleFS
Bartosh16Bartosh16/claude-skills/ai-audit/SKILL.md

ai-audit

Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Audytuje tekst, artykuł, bloga, landing albo cały korpus treści pod kątem sygnałów "AI slop" — produkcji liniowej z jednego master promptu: powtarzalny szablon, brak głosu autora i doświadczenia z pierwszej ręki, zerowy information gain, wzorce językowe LLM, ślady maszynowej produkcji, treść podporządkowana lejkowi sprzedażowemu. Zwraca SLOP-score 0–100, werdykt, dowody z cytatami i plan naprawy. ZAWSZE używaj tego skilla gdy użytkownik mówi: "zrób audyt AI", "ai-audit", "sprawdź czy to slop", "czy ten blog jest pisany przez AI", "audyt bloga konkurencji", "przeanalizuj te artykuły pod kątem AI", "czy ta treść to content farm", "oceń jakość tych tekstów", "sprawdź czy nasze artykuły nie wyglądają jak generowane", "audyt treści pod Helpful Content", "czy Google to zdegraduje", "sprawdź te URL-e", "przeanalizuj konkurencję contentowo". Używaj też proaktywnie, gdy użytkownik wkleja kilka artykułów lub linki do bloga i pyta o ich jakość, oryginalność, wiarygodność albo o to, czy widać w nich rękę AI — nawet bez słowa "audyt".

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.