sec-edgar
Skill63 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Pull SEC EDGAR filings, XBRL financials, and Form 3/4/5 insider trades for accounting and finance research. Prefer the SEC EDGAR MCP for live lookups; use WRDS for panel Compustat/CRSP merges. Enforces CIK discipline, User-Agent rules, and sample inspection before claiming results.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- clearsmog/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kansoku-trade/kansokutheir own version, first seen Sep 9, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- kansoku-trade/kansoku★ 322same name
- clearsmog/claude-skills★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository47 other files it gives its agents.
- install/claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- daskSkill
- econ-visualizationSkill
- geopandasSkill
- matplotlibSkill
- plotlySkill
- polarsSkill
- pymc-bayesian-modelingSkill
- scikit-learnSkill
- seabornSkill
- statistical-analysisSkill
- statsmodelsSkill
- pyfixestSkill
- python-panel-dataSkill
- r-econometricsSkill
- stata-data-cleaningSkill
- stata-regressionSkill
- wrdsSkill
- api-data-fetcherSkill
- citation-managementSkill
- datacommons-clientSkill
- exploratory-data-analysisSkill
- financial-text-nlpSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- lit-review-assistantSkill
- openalex-apiSkill
- paper-2-acfin-webSkill
- research-ideationSkill
- research-lookupSkill
- web-scrapeSkill
- academic-paper-writerSkill
- beamer-presentationSkill
- econ-humanizer-plusSkill
- econ-humanizerSkill
- econ-refereeSkill
- econ-slidesSkill
- econ-writeSkill
- econ-writing-plusSkill
- hypothesis-generationSkill
- latex-econ-modelSkill
- latex-postersSkill
- latex-tablesSkill
- paper-pdfSkill
- peer-reviewSkill
- scholar-evaluationSkill
- scientific-critical-thinkingSkill
- venue-templatesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use Stefano Amorelli's sec-edgar-mcp (built on edgartools) when the agent needs live filings.
- Distinctive: line 18
Prefer MCP tools over ad-hoc scraping when the server is registered
- Distinctive: line 28
Before asserting that a filing pull "worked":
- Distinctive: line 55
Prefer XBRL-parsed balance sheet / income / cash flow from MCP
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Barrios Skills — John Barrios's curated workflow for economists and accountants. Prioritize reproducible empirical work, clear identification language, and journal-ready output.
SEC EDGAR MCP (recommended for AI agents)
Use Stefano Amorelli's sec-edgar-mcp (built on edgartools) when the agent needs live filings.
Before querying EDGAR, the user must:
- Follow install/sec-edgar-mcp.md
- Set a real User-Agent:
SEC_EDGAR_USER_AGENT="Name (email@institution.edu)"(SEC fair-access requirement) - Prefer MCP tools over ad-hoc scraping when the server is registered
When to use WRDS instead: Compustat fundamentals panels, CRSP returns, CCM links, ExecuComp, ISS, TRACE/TAQ — use the wrds skill + wrds-mcp. EDGAR is for filing text, XBRL facts, 8-K events, and public insider Forms 3/4/5 when you do not need WRDS panel infrastructure.
SEC EDGAR for accounting & finance research
Iron law: no claim without sample inspection
Before asserting that a filing pull "worked":
- IDENTIFY the firm (CIK or ticker → CIK) and form type
- VALIDATE the accession / period you intended
- EXECUTE the pull
- INSPECT a sample (company name, filing date, section heading, one numeric fact)
- CITE the EDGAR URL in notes so numbers are auditable
Rationalization table — stop if you think
| Excuse | Reality | Do instead |
| "Ticker is enough" | Tickers recycle; CIK is stable | Resolve CIK first, store it |
| "XBRL equals Compustat" | Tag coverage and restatements differ | Document source; reconcile if both used |
| "I'll scrape HTML tables" | Layout breaks; XBRL/MCP is stabler | Prefer XBRL facts or MCP financials tools |
| "Form 4 = Insider Trading database" | Public EDGAR ≠ cleaned WRDS panels | Use WRDS for research panels when available |
Typical workflows
1. Company → filings
- Resolve CIK from name or ticker
- List recent 10-K / 10-Q / 8-K with filing dates
- Extract a section (e.g. Item 1A, MD&A) only when needed — avoid dumping full HTML into context
2. Financial statement facts
- Prefer XBRL-parsed balance sheet / income / cash flow from MCP
- Record units, scale, and period end
- Flag: never invent a ratio; compute from retrieved facts and show the formula
3. Insider trades (Form 3/4/5)
- Pull transactions for a CIK and date window
- Note: open-market vs award/grant; role of reporting person
- For large-sample insider studies, prefer WRDS/Thomson when the user has access
Accounting / finance research notes
- Identification language: filing date ≠ event date for some 8-Ks; use the relevant timestamp the paper needs
- Restatements: XBRL history can change; pin accession numbers in replication folders
- Fair access: respect SEC rate limits; never share another researcher's User-Agent email
- Replication: save accession numbers + URLs alongside any extracted table
Output checklist
- CIK recorded
- Form type and accession (or filing URL) recorded
- Sample row/section inspected
- WRDS vs EDGAR choice justified if both could apply
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

