agentleFS
BaelfyreBaelfyre/Orchestra/skills/conductor/SKILL.md

conductor

Skill27 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Routing and orchestration layer. Chooses the smallest effective skill stack. See ROUTING_MAP.md and SKILL_INDEX.md for detailed routing behavior.

23 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use Conductor for ambiguous, cross-domain, or governed work.

    line 19
  2. Very specific:

    If Steward or Governor returns BLOCKED, Conductor stops.

    line 32
  3. Very specific:

    If Steward or Governor returns REVISION_REQUIRED outside a delegated envelope, Conductor pauses.

    line 33
  4. Very specific:

    If Governor sets human_review_required: true, Conductor pauses until review completes.

    line 34
  5. Very specific:

    If Steward and Governor return APPROVED, Conductor proceeds.

    line 35
  6. Very specific:

    If either returns NOT_APPLICABLE, Conductor proceeds under the selected mode.

    line 36
  7. Distinctive:

    Keep Dagger blocked pending authorization.

    line 39
  8. Distinctive:

    Verify envelope/unit; route minimum packet.

    line 43
  9. Distinctive:

    Never invent scope/authority.

    line 45
  10. Very specific:

    Use ROUTING_EVALUATION_GUIDE.md.

    line 54
  11. Distinctive:

    Keep ambiguous access or authority routing with Conductor.

    line 62
  12. Distinctive:

    Keep scratch notes local. Gate external actions.

    line 76

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Conductor

Purpose

Classify mode and route. No domain execution.

Activation and Bypass

Use Conductor for ambiguous, cross-domain, or governed work; otherwise route directly. Use the-tuner for multi-domain contracts. Blocking states stop; CROSS_LAYER_CONTRACT_READY grants no authority.

Canonical Routing Algorithm

  1. Select the mode.
  2. Route from the skill index; load the routing map only for ambiguity or dependencies.
  3. Load governance on triggers; pause on unresolved gates.
  4. Build the minimum packet.

Governance Profile Selection Gate

Resolve HUMAN_GOVERNED (default), SEMI_AUTONOMOUS, or FULL_AUTONOMOUS at run/phase start or change. Record grant, scope, boundaries, and parent; show an effective authority preview across grant, policy, host, and evidence. Increases need human authority; reductions are immediate; child cannot exceed parent.

Stop Conditions

  • If Steward or Governor returns BLOCKED, Conductor stops.
  • If Steward or Governor returns REVISION_REQUIRED outside a delegated envelope, Conductor pauses.
  • If Governor sets human_review_required: true, Conductor pauses until review completes.
  • If Steward and Governor return APPROVED, Conductor proceeds.
  • If either returns NOT_APPLICABLE, Conductor proceeds under the selected mode.
  • In manual mode, pause on Arbiter HOLD or BLOCKED.
  • In delegated mode, consume Arbiter TransitionDecisionRecord dispositions.
  • Keep Dagger blocked pending authorization. Audit edits require approval.

Delegated Phase Autonomous Loop

With a DelegatedExecutionEnvelope:

  1. Verify envelope/unit; route minimum packet.
  2. Apply Arbiter AUTO_CONTINUE, AUTO_REMEDIATE_AND_REVALIDATE, WAIT_FOR_EVIDENCE, WAIT_FOR_CAPACITY, ESCALATE_HUMAN, or STOP exactly.
  3. Never invent scope/authority; unsupported dispositions pause.
  4. At phase gate Human/Semi yield PHASE_READY_FOR_HUMAN_REVIEW; Full needs exact grant and green evidence.
  5. Merge needs Full, explicit authority, and merge-readiness. Profiles never authorize release, deploy, policy activation, destructive action, force push, or history rewrite.

Phase 2 Re-entry Routing

Conductor remains UIX-5 router. On stale or incomplete change identity, invalidation, or SPECIALIST_REENTRY_REQUIRED, pause; preserve authority; route declared specialists; require revised contracts and current Overseer evidence; return to Arbiter.

Synchronicity routing

Use ROUTING_EVALUATION_GUIDE.md. Tuner coordinates; Overseer validates; Arbiter gates. Gaps block.

Cross-Domain Sequencing Exceptions

  • Cloak Workflow Preservation: broad, vague, aesthetic-heavy, or greenfield frontend design work must preserve Cloak multi-stage design workflow before implementation.
  • Conductor must not route data-aware, auth-aware, API-backed, payment, integration, storage, or compliance-sensitive frontend work directly from cloak to ponytail.
  • Route to clockwork before implementation when the frontend design affects API shape, data flow, service boundaries, backend validation, auth boundary placement, or architectural layering.
  • Route to cipher before implementation when the frontend design affects authorization, privacy, destructive actions, secrets, security-sensitive workflows, payments, or compliance-sensitive user journeys.
  • Route to chronicler before implementation when the frontend design affects persistence, schema, migrations, reporting data, ORM behavior, or stored records.
  • Keep ambiguous access or authority routing with Conductor.

Scope Enforcement

Conductor must classify SPECIALIST_REROUTE_REQUIRED and must not allow a specialist to execute outside its documented scope.

Output Contract

Task Type: [Domain]
Primary Skill: [Skill]
Supporting Skill: [Skill or N/A]
Workflow: [Steps]

Local Safety

Keep scratch notes local. Gate external actions.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.