conductor
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Unified plan/exec/verify orchestration over a repo-local spec folder. Use when planning, executing, or verifying multi-step dev work that should survive across sessions. Mode is explicit: /conductor plan, /conductor exec, or /conductor verify. Replaces the separate planner and swarm skills.
24 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Baelfyre/Kaostheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- crbnos/carbontheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- 5thlayer/skillworkstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zedarvates/frugal-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- conductor-oss/conductor-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- j/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Other versions24 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 24
- crbnos/carbon★ 2.8ksame name
- microsoft/conductor★ 502same name
- garagon/nanostack★ 206same name
- Baelfyre/Kaos★ 27same name
- Baelfyre/Orchestra★ 27same name
- conductor-oss/conductor-skills★ 27same name
- melbinjp/jules-prompts★ 10same name
- sergeeey/Claude-cod-top-2026★ 9same name
- Kshitijpalsinghtomar/depth-skills★ 5same name
- foundry-studio-lab/nzshrimper-senior-dev★ 4same name
14 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 18 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 40
If the mode is absent, infer a *suggestion* from spec state and confirm before acting:
- Distinctive: line 42
no spec folder → suggest plan
- Very specific: line 44
all tasks done → suggest verify
- Very specific: line 46
Never act on inference for ambiguous states: failed tasks, a partially written spec, a stale HANDOFF.md, changed TECH.md tests, or a dirty …
- Distinctive: line 85
Read only the reference for the active mode:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 18 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Conductor
One skill, three modes, one shared artifact: a repo-local spec folder.
- plan — design the work and write the dispatch task list.
- exec — run the task list, dispatching to subagents or external executors.
- verify — judge the result against acceptance, fresh-eyed.
Conductor orchestrates; it composes other skills rather than reimplementing them:
specs/CLAUDE.md for PRODUCT.md/TECH.md, grill-me to stress-test the design,
and testing for the verify strategy. It dispatches impl/test/review work to a separate
clean-context executor chosen by each task's backend — opencode (DeepSeek), cursor (Composer),
omp (Oh My Pi CLI), codex (codex plugin in Claude Code, codex exec CLI elsewhere), or claude.
Default Roles
Claude (the host CLI) plans and orchestrates. Codex executes impl/test work and reviews
(review tasks and verify) via the codex plugin in Claude Code, the codex exec CLI elsewhere;
conductor can also dispatch to opencode (DeepSeek 4 Pro), cursor (Composer 2.5), and omp
(Oh My Pi CLI) per a task's backend — separate process, clean context, fresh eyes. Claude executes
directly for host-context work or as the last resort.
Mode Selection
Mode is explicit. The user passes it: /conductor plan|exec|verify.
If the mode is absent, infer a suggestion from spec state and confirm before acting:
- no spec folder → suggest plan
- spec with
pendingtasks → suggest exec - all tasks
done→ suggest verify
Never act on inference for ambiguous states: failed tasks, a partially written spec, a stale
HANDOFF.md, changed TECH.md tests, or a dirty worktree. Ask the user which mode they mean.
Spec Folder
Repo-local, following specs/CLAUDE.md:
specs/<ticket-id>/ # when tied to an issue/ticket
specs/YYYYMMDD-HHMM-<kebab-title>/ # otherwise
├── PRODUCT.md # intent + ## Acceptance with stable VAL-* ids (specs/CLAUDE.md)
├── TECH.md # approach + ## Tests + verification commands (specs/CLAUDE.md)
├── FINDINGS.md # research journal + append-only ## Execution Log
├── TASKS.md # execution marker + TOON dispatch block + status
├── HANDOFF.md # final rollup, written by verify
└── runs/<task-id>/ # evidence, git-ignored (impl/test: summary + diff; review: review.log)There is no separate validation-contract.md or progress.md. Their functions live on:
- definition of done →
PRODUCT.md## Acceptancewith stableVAL-*ids; each behavior-claiming task carriescontract_refs. - current task state (canonical) →
TASKS.mdTOONstatus+result; resume reads these. - status history (canonical, append-only) →
FINDINGS.md## Execution Log; it is the status-regression baseline, not a mere projection. A TOON-vs-log disagreement is a ledger error (regression), valid only with areplannedlog entry — not auto-won by TOON. - projections (lose to TOON on conflict) →
runs/<task-id>/(git-ignored artifacts),HANDOFF.md, the dependency view, the Mermaid graph, and the Claude Code native Task mirror.
Operating Principles
- Parallelism: design parallel batches from independent work, not from wishful concurrency.
- Drift Control: pin every task to acceptance ids, repo facts, or explicit assumptions; stop when evidence conflicts.
- Speed: remove serial waits unless a dependency is real.
- Token Efficiency: write short task descriptions and point to files instead of pasting large context.
- Granularity: create right-sized tasks with one clear outcome, one owner, and one verification path.
Modes
Read only the reference for the active mode:
- plan →
references/plan.md - exec →
references/exec.md - verify →
references/verify.md
Templates: references/tasks-template.md, references/findings-template.md, references/handoff-template.md.
When Not to Use
Ad-hoc or trivial work (a single edit, a quick fix) skips conductor — use the default plan mode of the host CLI. Conductor is for serious multi-step dev that benefits from a durable spec folder.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

