run-evals
Skill135 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run evaluation tests for prompt quality. Use for: run evals, validate prompt changes, check prompt quality, eval recording, evaluation failure, debug eval, use recording.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
After modifying any .prompty file to validate quality hasn't regressed
- Very specific: line 15
Always activate the virtualenv first: .venv\Scripts\activate (Windows) or source .venv/bin/activate (Linux/macOS).
- Very specific: line 68
If you change a test file, delete its recording or run without --use-recording
- Very specific: line 74
Field name mismatch: Test YAML fields must exactly match target function parameter names (excluding testcase and response)
- Very specific: line 75
Stale recordings: After changing a prompt, delete recordings or run without --use-recording to get fresh results
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Run Evaluations
When to Use
- After modifying any
.promptyfile to validate quality hasn't regressed - Debugging failing or partial eval results
- Iterating on prompts with cached recordings to avoid LLM costs
Running Evals
Always activate the virtualenv first: .venv\Scripts\activate (Windows) or source .venv/bin/activate (Linux/macOS).
Via CLI
# Run all workflows
avc test eval
# Run a specific workflow
avc test eval --test-paths evals/tests/mention_action
# Run a single test file
avc test eval --test-paths evals/tests/filter_existing_comment/discard_azure_sdk_repeat_comment.yaml
# Multiple runs (median result kept)
avc test eval --num-runs 5 --test-paths evals/tests/filter_comment_metadata
# Use recordings (cached LLM responses) — first run saves, subsequent runs reuse
avc test eval --use-recording --test-paths evals/tests/mention_action
# Verbose output (show passing tests too)
avc test eval --style verboseVia run.py directly
cd evals
python run.py --test-paths tests/mention_actionExisting Workflows
| Workflow directory | Kind | Target function in _custom.py | Prompt tested |
mention_action | prompt | _mention_action_workflow | parse_conversation_action.prompty |
mention_summarize | summarize_prompt | _mention_summarize_workflow | summarize_github_actions.prompty |
thread_resolution_action | prompt | _thread_resolution_action_workflow | parse_thread_resolution_action.prompty |
filter_comment_metadata | prompt | _filter_comment_metadata | filter_comment_with_metadata.prompty |
filter_existing_comment | prompt | _filter_existing_comment | filter_existing_comment.prompty |
deduplicate_parser_issue | prompt | _deduplicate_parser_issue | deduplicate_parser_issue.prompty |
deduplicate_guidelines_issue | prompt | _deduplicate_guidelines_issue | deduplicate_guidelines_issue.prompty |
filter_generic_comment | prompt | _filter_generic_comment | filter_generic_comment.prompty |
judge_comment_confidence | prompt | _judge_comment_confidence | judge_comment_confidence.prompty |
merge_comments | summarize_prompt | _merge_comments | merge_comments.prompty |
generate_correlation_ids | prompt | _generate_correlation_ids | generate_correlation_ids.prompty |
Evaluator kinds
prompt— Action-based. Compares expected vs actual action, then similarity-scores the rationale. Wrong action = 0%.summarize_prompt— Summary-based. UsesSimilarityEvaluatoron full output. Success threshold: score > 70%.
Recordings
- Stored in
evals/recordings/<workflow_name>/<testcase_id>.json - Gitignored — each dev builds their own cache
- If you change a test file, delete its recording or run without
--use-recording --use-recordingon first run makes LLM calls and saves; subsequent runs reuse cached responses
Gotchas
- Use
python cli.pynot.\avc: Theavc.batscript calls barepythonwhich may resolve to the system Python instead of the venv. Use.venv\Scripts\activate; python cli.py test eval ...to ensure the venv Python is used. - Field name mismatch: Test YAML fields must exactly match target function parameter names (excluding
testcaseandresponse) - Stale recordings: After changing a prompt, delete recordings or run without
--use-recordingto get fresh results - Testcase uniqueness: The
testcasefield must be unique across all test files in a workflow — it's the cache key - Kind validation: The
kindintest-config.yamlmust be registered in_config_loader.py(promptorsummarize_prompt)
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- lycorp-jp/sim-use★ 1.5ksame name
- danielvm-git/bigpowers★ 274same name
- BariBariGood/manzanas★ 17same name
- stellar-experimental/stellar-raven★ 11same name
- google/skills_lint.dart★ 6same name
- on-par/software-factory★ 4same name
- PyLops/pylops-agent-skills★ 1same name
- rmatx/multi-agent-cs-crew★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository43 other files it gives its agents.
- packages/python-packages/apiview-copilot/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- azsdk-common-apiview-feedback-resolutionSkill
- azsdk-common-generate-sdk-locallySkill
- azsdk-common-generate-sdk-pipelineSkill
- azsdk-common-pipeline-analysisSkill
- azsdk-common-pipeline-fixerSkill
- azsdk-common-prepare-release-planSkill
- azsdk-common-sdk-breaking-changeSkill
- azsdk-common-sdk-releaseSkill
- azsdk-common-typespec-namingSkill
- azure-typespec-assessmentSkill
- azure-typespec-authorSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- eval-authoring-skillSkill
- eval-authoring-toolSkill
- eval-authoring-workflowSkill
- markdown-token-optimizerSkill
- sdk-ai-bot-eval-datasetSkill
- sdk-ai-bot-run-evaluationSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- add-endpointSkill
- audit-filtersSkill
- dev-setupSkill
- kb-searchSkill
- report-active-reviewsSkill
- report-apiview-metricsSkill
- report-architect-commentsSkill
- report-feedbackSkill
- report-memorySkill
- report-revisionsSkill
- run-metricsSkill
- update-guidelinesSkill
- apiview-feedback-resolutionSkill
- azure-typespec-authorSkill
- generate-sdk-locallySkill
- azsdk-common-live-and-recorded-testsSkill
- markdown-token-optimizerSkill
- pipeline-troubleshootingSkill
- azsdk-common-prepare-release-planSkill
- azsdk-common-sdk-releaseSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- pr-review-helpSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

