node-connect
Skill325 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Diagnose OpenClaw node connection and pairing failures for Android, iOS, and macOS companion apps. Use when QR/setup code/manual connect fails, local Wi-Fi works but VPS/tailnet does not, or errors mention pairing required, unauthorized, bootstrap token invalid or expired, gateway.bind, gateway.remote.url, Tailscale, or plugins.entries.device-pair.config.publicUrl.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Do not mix them.
- Distinctive: line 26
If the setup is unclear or the failure report is vague, ask short clarifying questions before diagnosing.
- Very specific: line 35
Do not guess from can't connect.
- Very specific: line 39
Prefer openclaw qr --json.
- Distinctive: line 54
If this OpenClaw instance is pointed at a remote gateway, also run:
- Distinctive: line 60
If Tailscale is part of the story:
- Very specific: line 83
If openclaw qr --json says Gateway is only bound to loopback:
- Very specific: line 100
If the app says pairing required:
- Distinctive: line 114
do this after any URL/auth fix too
- Distinctive: line 134
If there is not enough signal yet, ask for setup + exact app text instead of guessing.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Node Connect
Goal: find the one real route from node -> gateway, verify OpenClaw is advertising that route, then fix pairing/auth.
Topology first
Decide which case you are in before proposing fixes:
- same machine / emulator / USB tunnel
- same LAN / local Wi-Fi
- same Tailscale tailnet
- public URL / reverse proxy
Do not mix them.
- Local Wi-Fi problem: do not switch to Tailscale unless remote access is actually needed.
- VPS / remote gateway problem: do not keep debugging
localhostor LAN IPs.
If ambiguous, ask first
If the setup is unclear or the failure report is vague, ask short clarifying questions before diagnosing.
Ask for:
- which route they intend: same machine, same LAN, Tailscale tailnet, or public URL
- whether they used QR/setup code or manual host/port
- the exact app text/status/error, quoted exactly if possible
- whether
openclaw devices listshows a pending pairing request
Do not guess from can't connect.
Canonical checks
Prefer openclaw qr --json. It uses the same setup-code payload Android scans.
openclaw config get gateway.mode
openclaw config get gateway.bind
openclaw config get gateway.tailscale.mode
openclaw config get gateway.remote.url
openclaw config get gateway.auth.mode
openclaw config get gateway.auth.allowTailscale
openclaw config get plugins.entries.device-pair.config.publicUrl
openclaw qr --json
openclaw devices list
openclaw nodes statusIf this OpenClaw instance is pointed at a remote gateway, also run:
openclaw qr --remote --jsonIf Tailscale is part of the story:
tailscale status --jsonRead the result, not guesses
openclaw qr --json success means:
gatewayUrl: this is the actual endpoint the app should use.urlSource: this tells you which config path won.
Common good sources:
gateway.bind=lan: same Wi-Fi / LAN onlygateway.bind=tailnet: direct tailnet accessgateway.tailscale.mode=serveorgateway.tailscale.mode=funnel: Tailscale routeplugins.entries.device-pair.config.publicUrl: explicit public/reverse-proxy routegateway.remote.url: remote gateway route
Root-cause map
If openclaw qr --json says Gateway is only bound to loopback:
- remote node cannot connect yet
- fix the route, then generate a fresh setup code
gateway.bind=autois not enough if the effective QR route is still loopback- same LAN: use
gateway.bind=lan - same tailnet: prefer
gateway.tailscale.mode=serveor usegateway.bind=tailnet - public internet: set a real
plugins.entries.device-pair.config.publicUrlorgateway.remote.url
If gateway.bind=tailnet set, but no tailnet IP was found:
- gateway host is not actually on Tailscale
If qr --remote requires gateway.remote.url:
- remote-mode config is incomplete
If the app says pairing required:
- network route and auth worked
- approve the pending device
openclaw devices list
openclaw devices approve --latestIf the app says bootstrap token invalid or expired:
- old setup code
- generate a fresh one and rescan
- do this after any URL/auth fix too
If the app says unauthorized:
- wrong token/password, or wrong Tailscale expectation
- for Tailscale Serve,
gateway.auth.allowTailscalemust match the intended flow - otherwise use explicit token/password
Fast heuristics
- Same Wi-Fi setup + gateway advertises
127.0.0.1,localhost, or loopback-only config: wrong. - Remote setup + setup/manual uses private LAN IP: wrong.
- Tailnet setup + gateway advertises LAN IP instead of MagicDNS / tailnet route: wrong.
- Public URL set but QR still advertises something else: inspect
urlSource; config is not what you think. openclaw devices listshows pending requests: stop changing network config and approve first.
Fix style
Reply with one concrete diagnosis and one route.
If there is not enough signal yet, ask for setup + exact app text instead of guessing.
Good:
The gateway is still loopback-only, so a node on another network can never reach it. Enable Tailscale Serve, restart the gateway, run openclaw qr again, rescan, then approve the pending device pairing.
Bad:
Maybe LAN, maybe Tailscale, maybe port forwarding, maybe public URL.
Other versions16 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 4
- casibase/casibase★ 5.7k100% same
- the-open-agent/openagent★ 5.7k100% same
- OpenBMB/EdgeClaw★ 1.2k100% same
- hkyutong/OneClaw★ 1100% same
Edited · 2
- spinabot/brigade★ 11k85% same
- OpenGitCode/OpenShell★ 085% same
Wrote their own version · 10
- moltbot/moltbot★ 393ksame name
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 393ksame name
- steipete/warelay★ 392ksame name
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 392ksame name
- steipete/clawdis★ 392ksame name
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391ksame name
- openclaw/openclaw★ 391ksame name
- friuns2/openclaw-android-assistant★ 556same name
- OpenClawAndroid/openclaw-android-assistant★ 556same name
- bighamx/openclaw-android-node-apk★ 59same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use discord-e2e, openclaw-repair-sweep and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
molt-botSkilldiscord-e2e
Test Discord with Convex-leased QA bots: check credentials without a Gateway, exercise owned messages, or prove OpenClaw replies, files, threads, reactions, streaming, and typing. Distinguish API and Gateway evidence from manual user interactions.
Also in 10 projects that use this
molt-botSkillopenclaw-repair-sweep
Run scoped OpenClaw issue/PR repair campaigns: coordinate workers, prove root causes, and land or close verified work under the requested authority.
Also in 10 projects that use this
steipeteSkillplugin-sdk-impact
Query how many public plugins use a Plugin SDK method, optionally by recent release date, and assess SDK deprecation or behavior changes using live ClawHub evidence.
Also in 6 projects that use this
steipeteSkillpr-simplify
Simplify your own change to its smallest complete fix. Use before opening a PR, before pushing large repairs to one, or when asked to shrink a PR or clean up slop.
Also in 6 projects that use this
supermansuper563-opsSkillauto-qa
Continuously audit, live-test, and stress-test the current OpenClaw codebase across at least ten independently scoped subsystem lanes; default to 100 independently verified, landed root-cause fixes, maintain an evidence-backed report, and announce each merged pull request immediately. Use for OpenClaw-wide autonomous QA, live-provider campaigns, gateway, CLI, web, plugin, native-app, scenario, packaging, and extended soak testing.
Also in 10 projects that use this
clawsoulsSkillchannel-message-flows
Use when running QA Lab channel message flow evidence.
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +2 more from molt-bot
In this repository65 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- extensions/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- extensions/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- openclaw-ghsa-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-parallels-smokeSkill
- openclaw-pr-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-qa-testingSkill
- openclaw-release-maintainerSkill
- openclaw-test-heap-leaksSkill
- parallels-discord-roundtripSkill
- security-triageSkill
- update-openclaw-bundleSkill
- 1passwordSkill
- apple-notesSkill
- apple-remindersSkill
- bear-notesSkill
- blogwatcherSkill
- blucliSkill
- bluebubblesSkill
- camsnapSkill
- canvasSkill
- clawhubSkill
- coding-agentSkill
- discordSkill
- eightctlSkill
- geminiSkill
- gh-issuesSkill
- gifgrepSkill
- githubSkill
- gogSkill
- goplacesSkill
- healthcheckSkill
- himalayaSkill
- imsgSkill
- mcporterSkill
- model-usageSkill
- nano-pdfSkill
- notionSkill
- obsidianSkill
- openai-whisper-apiSkill
- openai-whisperSkill
- openhueSkill
- oracleSkill
- ordercliSkill
- peekabooSkill
- sagSkill
- session-logsSkill
- sherpa-onnx-ttsSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- slackSkill
- songseeSkill
- sonoscliSkill
- spotify-playerSkill
- summarizeSkill
- taskflow-inbox-triageSkill
- taskflowSkill
- things-macSkill
- tmuxSkill
- trelloSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

