agentleFS
AsiaOstrichAsiaOstrich/EngramGraph/.agents/skills/testing-guide/SKILL.md

testing-guide

Skill4 starsChanged 28 days agoMITView on GitHub

Testing pyramid and test writing standards for UT/IT/ST/E2E. Supports ISTQB and Industry Pyramid frameworks. Use when: writing tests, discussing test coverage, test strategy, or test naming. Not for: driving a Red-Green-Refactor cycle — use /tdd; measuring achieved coverage — use /coverage. Keywords: test, unit, integration, e2e, coverage, mock, ISTQB, SIT.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    UT: Use mocks/stubs for all external deps

    line 150
  2. Distinctive:

    IT: Use fakes for DB, stubs for external APIs

    line 151
  3. Very specific:

    Check CONTRIBUTING.md for "Disabled Skills" section

    line 285
  4. Distinctive:

    If this skill is listed, it is disabled for this project

    line 286
  5. Very specific:

    Check CONTRIBUTING.md for "Testing Standards" section

    line 287
  6. Distinctive:

    If not found, default to standard coverage targets

    line 288
  7. Distinctive:

    If no configuration found and context is unclear:

    line 292
  8. Distinctive:

    Ask the user: "This project hasn't configured testing standards.

    line 294
  9. Very specific:

    After user selection, suggest documenting in CONTRIBUTING.md:

    line 295
  10. Very specific:

    After /testing completes, the AI assistant should suggest:

    line 332

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Testing Guide

Language: English | 繁體中文

Version: 1.2.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-29 Applicability: Claude Code Skills


Purpose

This skill provides testing pyramid standards and best practices for systematic testing, supporting both ISTQB and Industry Pyramid frameworks.

Testing Skills Navigator | 測試技能導航

UDS provides 6 testing-related skills. Use this decision tree to find the right one:

What do you want to do? | 你想做什麼?
├── Measure code coverage (lines/branches/functions)    → /coverage
├── Track which requirements have tests (AC traceability) → /ac-coverage
├── Develop with Test-Driven Development (Red-Green-Refactor) → /tdd
├── Write BDD scenarios (Given-When-Then)               → /bdd
├── Define acceptance tests with stakeholders            → /atdd
└── Learn testing standards and best practices           → /testing (this skill)
SkillFocus焦點
/testingStandards and best practices reference測試標準與最佳實踐參考
/coverageCode-level coverage analysis程式碼層級覆蓋率分析
/ac-coverageRequirement-level AC traceability需求層級 AC 可追蹤性
/tddRed-Green-Refactor development cycle紅-綠-重構開發循環
/bddBehavior scenarios with Given-When-ThenGiven-When-Then 行為場景
/atddAcceptance criteria with stakeholders與利害關係人定義驗收條件

Framework Selection

FrameworkLevelsBest For
ISTQBUT → IT/SIT → ST → AT/UATEnterprise, compliance, formal QA
Industry PyramidUT (70%) → IT (20%) → E2E (10%)Agile, DevOps, CI/CD

Note on Integration Testing abbreviation:

  • IT (Integration Testing): Agile/DevOps communities
  • SIT (System Integration Testing): Enterprise/ISTQB contexts
  • Both refer to the same testing level

Quick Reference

Testing Pyramid (Industry Standard)

              ┌─────────┐
              │   E2E   │  ← 10% (Fewer, slower)
             ─┴─────────┴─
            ┌─────────────┐
            │   IT/SIT    │  ← 20% (Integration)
           ─┴─────────────┴─
          ┌─────────────────┐
          │       UT        │  ← 70% (Unit)
          └─────────────────┘

Test Levels Overview

LevelScopeSpeedDependencies
UTSingle function/class< 100msMocked
IT/SITComponent interaction1-10sReal DB (containerized)
STFull system (ISTQB)MinutesProduction-like
E2EUser journeys30s+Everything real
AT/UATBusiness validation (ISTQB)VariesEverything real

Coverage Targets

MetricMinimumRecommended
Line70%85%
Branch60%80%
Function80%90%

Detailed Guidelines

For complete standards, see:

  • Testing Standards - Actionable rules
  • Testing Theory - Educational knowledge base
  • Testing Pyramid - Detailed pyramid ratios
  • Test Skeleton Templates - Multi-language skeletons for UT/IT/ST/Perf/Contract

AI-Optimized Format (Token-Efficient)

For AI assistants, use the YAML format files for reduced token usage:

  • Base standard: ai/standards/testing.ai.yaml
  • Framework options:
    • ISTQB Framework: ai/options/testing/istqb-framework.ai.yaml
    • Industry Pyramid: ai/options/testing/industry-pyramid.ai.yaml
  • Test level options:
    • Unit Testing: ai/options/testing/unit-testing.ai.yaml
    • Integration Testing: ai/options/testing/integration-testing.ai.yaml
    • System Testing: ai/options/testing/system-testing.ai.yaml
    • E2E Testing: ai/options/testing/e2e-testing.ai.yaml
    • Security Testing: ai/options/testing/security-testing.ai.yaml
    • Performance Testing: ai/options/testing/performance-testing.ai.yaml
    • Contract Testing: ai/options/testing/contract-testing.ai.yaml
  • Skeleton templates (all levels, multi-language): test-skeleton-templates.md

Naming Conventions

File Naming

[ClassName]Tests.cs       # C#
[ClassName].test.ts       # TypeScript
[class_name]_test.py      # Python
[class_name]_test.go      # Go

Method Naming

[MethodName]_[Scenario]_[ExpectedResult]()
should_[behavior]_when_[condition]()
test_[method]_[scenario]_[expected]()

Test Doubles

TypePurposeWhen to Use
StubReturns predefined valuesFixed API responses
MockVerifies interactionsCheck method called
FakeSimplified implementationIn-memory database
SpyRecords calls, delegatesPartial mocking

When to Use What

  • UT: Use mocks/stubs for all external deps
  • IT: Use fakes for DB, stubs for external APIs
  • ST: Real components, fake only external services
  • E2E: Real everything

AAA Pattern

test('method_scenario_expected', () => {
    // Arrange - Setup test data
    const input = createTestInput();
    const sut = new SystemUnderTest();

    // Act - Execute behavior
    const result = sut.execute(input);

    // Assert - Verify result
    expect(result).toBe(expected);
});

FIRST Principles

  • Fast - Tests run quickly
  • Independent - Tests don't affect each other
  • Repeatable - Same result every time
  • Self-validating - Clear pass/fail
  • Timely - Written with production code

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • ❌ Test Interdependence (tests must run in order)
  • ❌ Flaky Tests (sometimes pass, sometimes fail)
  • ❌ Testing Implementation Details
  • ❌ Over-Mocking
  • ❌ Missing Assertions
  • ❌ Magic Numbers/Strings

Testing Theory Essentials (YAML Compressed)

# === ISTQB FUNDAMENTALS ===
terminology:
  error: "Human mistake in thinking"
  defect: "Bug in code (caused by error)"
  failure: "System behaves incorrectly (caused by defect)"
  chain: "Error → Defect → Failure"

oracle_problem:
  definition: "How do we know the expected result is correct?"
  approaches:
    - specification_oracle: "Compare against spec"
    - reference_oracle: "Compare against reference impl"
    - consistency_oracle: "Same input → same output"
    - heuristic_oracle: "Reasonable approximation"

# === STATIC vs DYNAMIC ===
static_testing:
  definition: "Examine without executing"
  techniques: [reviews, walkthroughs, inspections, static_analysis]
  finds: "Defects before runtime"
  examples: [ESLint, SonarQube, code_review]

dynamic_testing:
  definition: "Execute and observe behavior"
  techniques: [unit, integration, system, acceptance]
  finds: "Failures during execution"

# === TEST DESIGN TECHNIQUES ===
black_box:
  equivalence_partitioning:
    principle: "Divide inputs into equivalent classes"
    example: "Age: [<0 invalid], [0-17 minor], [18-64 adult], [65+ senior]"
  boundary_value:
    principle: "Test at boundaries of partitions"
    example: "Age: test -1, 0, 17, 18, 64, 65"
  decision_table:
    principle: "Combinations of conditions → actions"
    use: "Complex business rules"
  state_transition:
    principle: "Valid sequences of states"
    use: "Workflow, state machines"

white_box:
  statement_coverage: "Every statement executed once"
  branch_coverage: "Every decision branch taken"
  condition_coverage: "Every condition T/F"
  path_coverage: "Every possible path (often impractical)"

# === RISK-BASED TESTING ===
risk_assessment:
  likelihood: "How likely to fail?"
  impact: "How bad if fails?"
  priority: "likelihood × impact"

risk_matrix:
  high_high: "Test extensively, first priority"
  high_low: "Good coverage"
  low_high: "Good coverage"
  low_low: "Basic coverage"

# === DEFECT MANAGEMENT ===
defect_lifecycle:
  states: [new, assigned, in_progress, fixed, verified, closed]
  reopen_trigger: "Verification fails"

severity_vs_priority:
  severity: "Technical impact (critical/major/minor/trivial)"
  priority: "Business urgency (high/medium/low)"
  example: "Typo on login page: low severity, high priority (brand)"

# === TEST ENVIRONMENT ===
isolation_levels:
  unit: "In-memory, mocked deps"
  integration: "Containerized DB (Docker)"
  staging: "Production-like, isolated"
  production: "Real, feature flags for testing"

test_data_strategies:
  fixtures: "Static predefined data"
  factories: "Dynamic generation (faker)"
  snapshots: "Sanitized production copy"
  synthetic: "Algorithm-generated edge cases"

Configuration Detection

This skill supports project-specific configuration.

Detection Order

  1. Check CONTRIBUTING.md for "Disabled Skills" section
    • If this skill is listed, it is disabled for this project
  2. Check CONTRIBUTING.md for "Testing Standards" section
  3. If not found, default to standard coverage targets

First-Time Setup

If no configuration found and context is unclear:

  1. Ask the user: "This project hasn't configured testing standards. Would you like to customize coverage targets?"
  2. After user selection, suggest documenting in CONTRIBUTING.md:
## Testing Standards

### Coverage Targets
| Metric | Target |
|--------|--------|
| Line | 80% |
| Branch | 70% |
| Function | 85% |

Configuration Example

In project's CONTRIBUTING.md:

## Testing Standards

### Coverage Targets
| Metric | Target |
|--------|--------|
| Line | 80% |
| Branch | 70% |
| Function | 85% |

### Testing Framework
- Unit Tests: Jest
- Integration Tests: Supertest
- E2E Tests: Playwright

Next Steps Guidance | 下一步引導

After /testing completes, the AI assistant should suggest:

測試標準與最佳實踐已掌握。建議下一步 / Testing standards and best practices understood. Suggested next steps:

  • 執行 /tdd 開始測試驅動開發(紅-綠-重構循環) ⭐ Recommended / 推薦 — 將測試知識立即轉化為實踐 / Turn testing knowledge into practice immediately
  • 執行 /coverage 分析目前程式碼覆蓋率 — 找出測試缺口 / Identify testing gaps
  • 執行 /bdd 撰寫行為驅動的 Given-When-Then 場景 — 從使用者角度定義測試 / Define tests from user perspective

Related Standards

  • Testing Standards - Actionable rules
  • Testing Theory - Educational knowledge base
  • Code Review Checklist

Version History

VersionDateChanges
1.2.02026-01-29Added links to new testing-theory.md knowledge base
1.1.02025-12-29Added Testing Theory Essentials YAML section
1.0.02025-12-24Initial: Standard sections (Purpose, Related Standards, Version History, License)

License

This skill is released under CC BY 4.0.

Source: universal-dev-standards

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.