ai-collaboration-standards
Skill4 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub
Prevent AI hallucination and ensure evidence-based responses when analyzing code or making suggestions. Use when: analyzing code, making recommendations, providing options, or when user asks about confidence/certainty. Not for: authoring the AI instruction files themselves — use /ai-instruction-standards; reviewing a concrete diff — use /code-review. Keywords: certainty, assumption, inference, evidence, source.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standardsword for word, first seen Nov 4, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards★ 84100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository55 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ac-coverageSkill
- adrSkill
- ai-friendly-architectureSkill
- ai-instruction-standardsSkill
- api-designSkill
- atddSkill
- auditSkill
- bddSkill
- brainstormSkill
- changelogSkill
- checkinSkill
- ci-cdSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commitSkill
- contract-testSkill
- databaseSkill
- deploySkill
- methodologySkill
- dev-workflowSkill
- docgenSkill
- documentation-guideSkill
- durableSkill
- e2eSkill
- error-code-guideSkill
- git-workflow-guideSkill
- incidentSkill
- journey-test-assistantSkill
- knowledge-graphSkill
- logging-guideSkill
- metricsSkill
- migrateSkill
- observabilitySkill
- orchestrateSkill
- planSkill
- prSkill
- discoverSkill
- project-structure-guideSkill
- pushSkill
- refactorSkill
- releaseSkill
- requirementSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverseSkill
- runbookSkill
- securitySkill
- scanSkill
- skill-builderSkill
- sloSkill
- spec-deriveSkill
- sddSkill
- sweepSkill
- tddSkill
- coverageSkill
- testing-guideSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 82
Evidence-Based Only: Only analyze content that has been explicitly read
- Distinctive: line 85
Always Recommend: When presenting options, include a recommended choice with reasoning
- Distinctive: line 135
Before making any statement:
- Very specific: line 152
Check CONTRIBUTING.md for "Certainty Tag Language" section
- Distinctive: line 153
If found, use the specified language (English / 中文)
- Distinctive: line 154
If not found, default to English tags
- Distinctive: line 158
If no configuration found and context is unclear:
- Distinctive: line 160
Ask the user: "This project hasn't configured certainty tag language preference.
- Very specific: line 161
After user selection, suggest documenting in CONTRIBUTING.md:
- Very specific: line 191
After /ai-collaboration completes, the AI assistant should suggest:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AI Collaboration Standards
Language: English | 繁體中文
Version: 1.1.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-25 Applicability: Claude Code Skills
AI Skills Hierarchy | AI 技能層級
This skill is part of a three-layer AI collaboration system:
| Layer | Skill | Question it Answers | 回答的問題 |
| Behavior (Immediate) | /ai-collaboration (this) | "How should AI respond accurately?" | 「AI 如何準確回應?」 |
| Configuration (Session) | /ai-instruction-standards | "What to write in CLAUDE.md?" | 「CLAUDE.md 該寫什麼?」 |
| Architecture (Long-term) | /ai-friendly-architecture | "How to structure code for AI?" | 「如何讓專案對 AI 友善?」 |
Purpose
This skill ensures AI assistants provide accurate, evidence-based responses without hallucination.
Quick Reference
Unified Tag System
This skill uses two complementary tag categories:
Category 1: Certainty Tags (for analyzing existing content)
| Tag | Use When |
[Confirmed] | Direct evidence from code/docs |
[Inferred] | Logical deduction from evidence |
[Assumption] | Based on common patterns (needs verification) |
[Unknown] | Information not available |
[Need Confirmation] | Requires user clarification |
Category 2: Derivation Tags (for generating new content)
| Tag | Use When |
[Source] | Direct content from spec/requirement |
[Derived] | Transformed from source content |
[Generated] | AI-generated structure |
[TODO] | Requires human implementation |
When to Use Which:
| Workflow | Primary Tags |
| Code analysis | Certainty Tags |
| Reverse engineering | Certainty Tags |
| Forward derivation | Derivation Tags |
| Spec generation | Derivation Tags |
Source Types
| Source Type | Tag | Reliability |
| Project Code | [Source: Code] | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Highest |
| Project Docs | [Source: Docs] | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High |
| External Docs | [Source: External] | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High |
| Web Search | [Source: Search] | ⭐⭐⭐ Medium |
| AI Knowledge | [Source: Knowledge] | ⭐⭐ Low |
| User Provided | [Source: User] | ⭐⭐⭐ Medium |
Core Rules
- Evidence-Based Only: Only analyze content that has been explicitly read
- Cite Sources: Include file path and line number for code references
- Classify Certainty: Tag all statements with certainty level
- Always Recommend: When presenting options, include a recommended choice with reasoning
Detailed Guidelines
For complete standards, see:
- Anti-Hallucination Guidelines
- Certainty Labels Reference
Examples
✅ Correct Response
[Confirmed] src/auth/service.ts:45 - JWT validation uses 'jsonwebtoken' library
[Inferred] Based on repository pattern in src/repositories/, likely using dependency injection
[Need Confirmation] Should the new feature support multi-tenancy?❌ Incorrect Response
The system uses Redis for caching (code not reviewed)
The UserService should have an authenticate() method (API not verified)✅ Correct Option Presentation
There are three options:
1. Redis caching
2. In-memory caching
3. File-based caching
**Recommended: Option 1 (Redis)**: Given the project already has Redis infrastructure
and needs cross-instance cache sharing, Redis is the most suitable choice.❌ Incorrect Option Presentation
There are three options:
1. Redis caching
2. In-memory caching
3. File-based caching
Please choose one.Checklist
Before making any statement:
- Source Verified - Have I read the actual file/document?
- Source Type Tagged - Did I specify
[Source: Code],[Source: External], etc.? - Reference Cited - Did I include file path and line number?
- Certainty Classified - Did I tag as
[Confirmed],[Inferred], etc.? - No Fabrication - Did I avoid inventing APIs, configs, or requirements?
- Recommendation Included - When presenting options, did I include a recommended choice?
Configuration Detection
This skill supports project-specific language configuration for certainty tags.
Detection Order
- Check
CONTRIBUTING.mdfor "Certainty Tag Language" section - If found, use the specified language (English / 中文)
- If not found, default to English tags
First-Time Setup
If no configuration found and context is unclear:
- Ask the user: "This project hasn't configured certainty tag language preference. Which would you like to use? (English / 中文)"
- After user selection, suggest documenting in
CONTRIBUTING.md:
## Certainty Tag Language
This project uses **[English / 中文]** certainty tags.
<!-- Options: English | 中文 -->Configuration Example
In project's CONTRIBUTING.md:
## Certainty Tag Language
This project uses **English** certainty tags.
### Tag Reference
- [Confirmed] - Direct evidence from code/docs
- [Inferred] - Logical deduction from evidence
- [Assumption] - Based on common patterns
- [Unknown] - Information not available
- [Need Confirmation] - Requires user clarificationNext Steps Guidance | 下一步引導
After /ai-collaboration completes, the AI assistant should suggest:
AI 協作行為規範已掌握。建議下一步 / AI collaboration behavior standards understood. Suggested next steps:
- 執行
/ai-instruction-standards建立或更新 CLAUDE.md 等 AI 指令檔案 ⭐ Recommended / 推薦 — 將協作標準寫入專案配置 / Write collaboration standards into project configuration- 執行
/ai-friendly-architecture設計 AI 友善架構 — 從長期架構層面優化 AI 協作 / Optimize AI collaboration at the architecture level- 執行
/code-review運用確定性標籤進行程式碼審查 — 實踐基於證據的分析 / Practice evidence-based analysis
Related Standards
- Anti-Hallucination Standards
- Code Review Checklist
- Testing Standards
Version History
| Version | Date | Changes |
| 1.1.0 | 2026-01-25 | Added: Unified Tag System with Certainty and Derivation tag categories |
| 1.0.0 | 2025-12-24 | Added: Standard sections (Purpose, Related Standards, Version History, License) |
License
This skill is released under CC BY 4.0.
Source: universal-dev-standards
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

