agentleFS
Arize-aiArize-ai/arize-skills/skills/arize-span-routing/SKILL.md

arize-span-routing

Skill72 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when one Python service must send each agent's, tenant's, team's, or request's spans to its correct Arize space and project using application metadata. Covers dynamic OpenTelemetry routing for custom agent builders and multi-tenant applications, including register_with_routing, set_routing_context, multi-space tracing, and custom span routing.

  • Reads credentials

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill to send each traced operation from one Python service to its correct Arize space and project.

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Do not use this skill for ordinary single-project tracing.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Never guess a destination or silently use another tenant's destination.

    line 18
  4. Very specific:

    Never embed API keys in code or ask users to paste keys into chat.

    line 19
  5. Distinctive:

    Use one API key that is authorized for every destination space.

    line 22
  6. Distinctive:

    Read only until the routing contract is clear.

    line 26
  7. Distinctive:

    Check async tasks, thread pools, queues, or background workers that may outlive the request context.

    line 34
  8. Distinctive:

    If service scope, metadata fields, mapping source, or destination behavior is ambiguous, stop and ask the minimum question needed.

    line 39
  9. Very specific:

    Use the project's package manager to require arize-otel>=0.11.0.

    line 45
  10. Distinctive:

    If the app already owns a provider with non-Arize telemetry, keep it and add the routing processor:

    line 61
  11. Distinctive:

    Use this type only when the codebase lacks an equivalent.

    line 93
  12. Very specific:

    All auto-instrumented and manual child spans created inside the routing context inherit arize.space_id and arize.project.name.

    line 134
  13. Distinctive:

    Run focused unit tests for the resolver and execution boundary.

    line 142
  14. Very specific:

    Use arize-trace with the same credential context to confirm each trace exists only in its intended destination.

    line 149
  15. Very specific:

    If dogfooding exposes a missing arize-otel capability, stop and propose a separate SDK change instead of adding a compatibility hack.

    line 158

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Arize Span Routing Skill

Use this skill to send each traced operation from one Python service to its correct Arize space and project. Each operation must resolve to exactly one space_id and project_name before its first span starts.

Do not use this skill for ordinary single-project tracing; use arize-instrumentation. This skill does not reroute spans after export, backfill historical spans, create Arize spaces/projects, or invent a customer-specific metadata mapping.

Safety rules

  • Never guess a destination or silently use another tenant's destination.
  • Never embed API keys in code or ask users to paste keys into chat. Read ARIZE_API_KEY from the environment.
  • Preserve existing non-Arize exporters and processors. Remove or replace a fixed-destination Arize export path so routed spans are not also copied to that destination.
  • Missing, invalid, or unavailable routing metadata must leave the business operation running but its spans unexported to Arize. Run that operation under a fresh OpenTelemetry context so stale routing values cannot leak across tenants. Log a warning without including secrets or sensitive metadata values.
  • Use one API key that is authorized for every destination space. Stop and report a credential blocker if that is not true.

Phase 1: Inspect and define the contract

Read only until the routing contract is clear.

  1. Identify the exact Python service and entrypoint to change.
  2. Find current tracing initialization, provider/exporters, instrumentors, and client creation order.
  3. Find the request or agent-execution boundary that owns destination metadata.
  4. Identify the stable metadata field(s) and existing source of truth that resolve to:
    • Arize space_id
    • Arize project_name
  5. Check async tasks, thread pools, queues, or background workers that may outlive the request context.
  6. Find the app's test command and existing test style.

Inspect only the target app's configuration. Do not search unrelated repositories, sibling services, shell startup files, or arbitrary .env files for credentials.

If service scope, metadata fields, mapping source, or destination behavior is ambiguous, stop and ask the minimum question needed. Do not install packages or edit code first. If the user requested implementation and all four are clear, summarize the contract briefly and continue.

Phase 2: Implement

1. Ensure routing support exists

Use the project's package manager to require arize-otel>=0.11.0. Do not change unrelated dependencies.

2. Initialize routing once

For an app without an existing OpenTelemetry provider, initialize routing before instrumentors and LLM clients:

import os

from arize.otel import register_with_routing

tracer_provider = register_with_routing(
    api_key=os.environ["ARIZE_API_KEY"],
)

If the app already owns a provider with non-Arize telemetry, keep it and add the routing processor:

import os

from arize.otel import ArizeRoutingSpanProcessor, Endpoint, Transport

tracer_provider.add_span_processor(
    ArizeRoutingSpanProcessor(
        api_key=os.environ["ARIZE_API_KEY"],
        endpoint=Endpoint.ARIZE,
        transport=Transport.GRPC,
    )
)

Reuse the app's configured endpoint and transport when present. Never call register_with_routing after another global provider has already been installed. If the provider also has a fixed Arize processor/exporter, remove that fixed path in its initialization before adding routing; OpenTelemetry processors cannot be safely removed after startup.

3. Resolve one routing target

Adapt the app's existing metadata model; do not introduce a framework for one lookup. The resolver must return both non-empty values or no target. Keep mapping data in its existing source of truth rather than duplicating it in tracing code.

from dataclasses import dataclass


@dataclass(frozen=True)
class RoutingTarget:
    space_id: str
    project_name: str

Use this type only when the codebase lacks an equivalent. Validate the result before any traced work begins.

4. Set context around the complete operation

Enter routing context at the highest boundary that has the metadata and encloses every child span:

Replace RoutingLookupError below with the resolver's specific existing lookup/configuration exception.

from opentelemetry import context as context_api
from arize.otel import set_routing_context


def run_without_arize_routing(request):
    token = context_api.attach(context_api.Context())
    try:
        return run_agent(request)
    finally:
        context_api.detach(token)


def handle_agent_request(request):
    try:
        target = resolve_routing_target(request.agent_metadata)
    except RoutingLookupError:
        logger.warning("Arize routing lookup failed; spans will not be exported")
        return run_without_arize_routing(request)

    if target is None or not target.space_id or not target.project_name:
        logger.warning("No Arize routing target; spans will not be exported")
        return run_without_arize_routing(request)

    with set_routing_context(
        space_id=target.space_id,
        project_name=target.project_name,
    ):
        return run_agent(request)

Catch only the resolver's expected lookup/configuration exceptions; do not hide unrelated application failures. A fresh context on the no-target path intentionally prevents inherited routing values from reaching Arize. It may start a new trace for other exporters; tenant isolation takes priority. If preserving the distributed parent is mandatory, report the missing public routing-clear API as an SDK follow-up rather than using private context keys.

All auto-instrumented and manual child spans created inside the routing context inherit arize.space_id and arize.project.name. Do not set routing after spans have started.

For background work, propagate the OpenTelemetry context explicitly or resolve and enter a new routing context in the worker. Never rely on request-local context after a queue or thread boundary.

See references/REFERENCE.md for agent experiment endpoints, existing-provider details, concurrency rules, testing, verification, and troubleshooting.

Verification

  1. Run focused unit tests for the resolver and execution boundary.
  2. Prove two different metadata values produce two different space/project pairs.
  3. Prove child spans inherit the selected pair.
  4. Prove concurrent operations cannot leak routing context.
  5. Prove unknown metadata and resolver failures clear inherited routing, export no spans to any fallback destination, and leave business logic running.
  6. Prove pre-existing non-Arize exporters/processors remain attached and no fixed Arize path remains.
  7. Trigger one uniquely named trace per target in non-production spaces.
  8. Use arize-trace with the same credential context to confirm each trace exists only in its intended destination.

For short-lived scripts, call force_flush() and shutdown() before exit. Finish as confirmed, confirmed with warnings, or a precise blocker; never report completion from unit tests alone when live verification was requested.

Guardrails and limits

  • Both routing values are required. Spans missing either value are skipped.
  • ArizeRoutingSpanProcessor creates and caches one processor per unique space. Flag unbounded or high-cardinality space IDs before implementation.
  • Routing selects spaces and projects only; other customer metadata still belongs in normal OpenInference attributes.
  • If dogfooding exposes a missing arize-otel capability, stop and propose a separate SDK change instead of adding a compatibility hack.

Related skills

  • arize-instrumentation: first-time or single-destination tracing
  • arize-trace: post-export verification and debugging
  • arize-admin: inspect or manage authorized spaces and API keys

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.