arize-instrumentation
Skill72 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub
Adds Arize AX tracing to an LLM application for the first time. Detects the stack, routes to the single matching integration doc, wires auto-instrumentation after user confirmation, and verifies traces land. Use when the user wants to instrument their app, add tracing from scratch, set up LLM observability, integrate OpenTelemetry or openinference, or get started with Arize tracing.
- Reads credentials
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- github/awesome-copilottheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- JustineDevs/premortemtheir own version, first seen Jun 9, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- JustineDevs/premortem★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- arize-adminSkill
- arize-ai-provider-integrationSkill
- arize-annotationSkill
- arize-compliance-auditSkill
- arize-datasetSkill
- arize-evaluatorSkill
- arize-experimentSkill
- arize-instrumentation-healthSkill
- arize-linkSkill
- arize-migrate-braintrustSkill
- arize-migrate-langfuseSkill
- arize-migrate-langsmithSkill
- arize-phoenix-migrationSkill
- arize-prompt-optimizationSkill
- arize-promptsSkill
- arize-span-routingSkill
- arize-traceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Add Arize AX tracing to an app for the first time: detect the stack → fetch the one matching integration doc → wire auto-instrumentation → …
- Very specific: line 38
Region: do not assume US. Preserve ARIZE_COLLECTOR_ENDPOINT or an endpoint already confirmed to target Arize.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Arize Instrumentation Skill
Add Arize AX tracing to an app for the first time: detect the stack → fetch the one matching integration doc → wire auto-instrumentation → verify a trace lands.
Route locally. Map the detected stack to a single doc page via references/integration-routing.md and fetch only that page. When the app uses an agent framework, route on the framework, not the provider SDK it wraps — a bare openai/anthropic import inside a framework app is not the integration target; route to a provider page only when the app calls the provider SDK directly with no framework in play. When the stack isn't listed there, search llms.txt for its integration page per the router; with no match, use manual instrumentation. Never bulk-read the PROMPT.md aggregate.
Rules: inspect before mutating; tracing is additive, never change business logic; follow existing style; no secrets in code and never ask the user to paste secrets (API keys, tokens) into the chat -- reference ARIZE_API_KEY/ARIZE_SPACE_ID env vars only, set by the user in their own .env/shell; preserve or ask for the app's Arize region/export endpoint instead of assuming US -- see references/regions-and-endpoints.md; ask before persistent local state (ax profiles, .zshrc, env vars) -- see references/ax-profiles.md.
Phase 1: Analysis (read-only — no code/files)
Detect from manifests + imports: language, package manager, LLM providers, frameworks, existing tracing (TracerProvider, register(), ARIZE_*/OTEL_*, Datadog/Honeycomb), existing Arize endpoint/region config (ARIZE_COLLECTOR_ENDPOINT, an in-code Arize endpoint option, or an OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT confirmed to target Arize), and whether the app runs tools / an agent loop (manual CHAIN/TOOL spans only if the matched framework instrumentor doesn't already cover them — decided in Phase 2). Confirm scope first — a monorepo, multiple services, or multiple frameworks needs a "which one?" question before touching anything; don't pick for the user.
Output a short summary (stack, proposed integration, existing tracing, scope). If the target is clear and the user asked to instrument now, continue; if ambiguous or analysis-only was requested, stop and confirm.
Phase 2: Implementation (after the target is confirmed)
- Fetch the matched integration doc and follow its install + wiring verbatim.
- Install with the detected package manager, before writing code — exact packages come from the matched doc. Python base:
arize-otel(current PyPI release) +openinference-instrumentation-{name}(package hyphens, import underscores). TS/JS:@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node+ the matched@arizeai/openinference-*(or a first-party exporter, e.g. Mastra's@mastra/arize). Go has no integration doc — see references/go.md for install, wiring, flush, and manual spans. - Credentials and region — app needs an API key + Space + exporter endpoint/region. Inspect only the target app's own config; never scan sibling repos/shell files, surface secrets, or accept a pasted key. See references/credentials-and-config.md, references/regions-and-endpoints.md, and references/ax-profiles.md.
- Centralize init in one module, before any LLM client is created. Existing OTel → add Arize as an additional exporter; don't replace it.
- Filter non-GenAI spans when the selected TypeScript integration supports a filter. Make this the default for the Arize exporter so generic HTTP/fetch, framework, and infrastructure spans do not flood the project. For Vercel AI SDK v7 with
@arizeai/openinference-vercel, setspanFilter: isOpenInferenceSpanandreparentOrphanedSpans: trueonOpenInferenceSimpleSpanProcessor; otherwise AI spans can retain references to filtered-out HTTP parents. For Mastra with@mastra/observability, configurespanFilter: span => span.type !== SpanType.GENERICon the Arize observability config, after checking that the app does not rely on GENERIC spans as its only user-facing boundary. Do not assume a universal OpenTelemetry option: inspect the matched integration's current API. If it has no filter, avoid enabling unrelated HTTP/auto-instrumentations for the Arize pipeline, or use a supported processor/collector filter that retains the intended GenAI spans. Keep useful semantic request boundaries; filtering policy should not silently discard the app's only user input/final answer span.
Auto vs manual: prefer the auto-instrumentor — do not hand-roll spans it already covers (duplicates spans, drifts from semconv). Add manual spans only for logic no instrumentor sees, or when the stack has no instrumentor at all. When the app calls the provider SDK directly, the OpenAI and Anthropic SDK instrumentors capture the LLM call — including the model's tool-call request (name + args) — but NOT the tool's execution, its return value, or the agent/chain boundary. A raw-SDK app with its own tool-calling loop MUST add a TOOL span per execution (to capture the result) and a CHAIN (or AGENT) span to group the turn, or those never appear — do this with @tracer.tool/@tracer.chain decorators wherever the functions exist (they set kind, metadata, and status automatically); hand-roll spans only where no decoratable function does. Some agent frameworks instead drive the model through their own client layer and emit their own OpenTelemetry spans; for those, a provider instrumentor captures nothing, so instrument via the framework's integration page rather than the provider SDK. Framework instrumentors (LangChain/LangGraph/OpenAI Agents SDK) typically cover tools and chains — verify in the matched doc before skipping manual spans. Keep register()/arize-otel-go for setup; see references/manual-spans.md and manual instrumentation.
Cross-cutting (every stack):
- Project name is required — missing it → HTTP 500 (
service.namealone fails). Set as a resource attribute: Pythonregister(project_name=…); TSSEMRESATTRS_PROJECT_NAME/model_id; GoOptions{ProjectName}oropeninference.project.name. - Don't hand-roll a
TracerProvider/exporter — useregister()/arize-otel-go; raw OTel only when integrating an existing provider. - Order: register tracer → instrumentors → clients.
- Region: do not assume US. Preserve
ARIZE_COLLECTOR_ENDPOINTor an endpoint already confirmed to target Arize. A genericOTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINTmay belong to an existing non-Arize exporter; preserve that exporter separately and ask for the Arize SaaS region instead of reusing it blindly. See references/regions-and-endpoints.md. - Prefer
@tracer.*decorators over hand-rolled spans — they set kind,input.value/output.value, full TOOL metadata, and terminal status automatically, so they can't emit theUNSET/incomplete spans hand-rolled ones do. The decorator is on the function definition, so dynamic dispatch is no reason to hand-roll. See references/manual-spans.md. - A hand-rolled span must set, before exit:
openinference.span.kind,input.value/output.value, and for a TOOL span all oftool.name/tool.description/tool.parameters. Most-missed line:start_as_current_spanrecords a raised exception asERRORbut never setsOK— so addspan.set_status(Status(StatusCode.OK))on the success path or the span exportsUNSETand fails scoring. See references/manual-spans.md. - Flush before exit (CLI/scripts/notebooks) or async exports drop: Python
force_flush()+shutdown(), TSshutdown(), Godefer tp.Shutdown(ctx)(neverlog.Fatalf/os.Exitmid-span). See references/session-tracking.md. - Sessions: for obvious multi-turn interactions (e.g. a multi-turn chatbot) or when the user asks, add
session.idso turns group into one conversation — see references/session-tracking.md. - Never silently override the app's project/space/IDs/endpoint — surface mismatches.
Verification
Done only when: app builds/typechecks, starts with tracing, emits ≥1 real request, and you confirm the trace in Arize or give a precise app-vs-Arize blocker. Trigger an LLM call, then use the arize-trace skill to confirm spans (kind, input.value/output.value, parent-child; CHAIN+TOOL if tools run). Include the span filter check for TypeScript integrations that offer one. Review all spans in the new trace for missing input/output, including unclassified REST/HTTP spans; follow references/verification.md to decide whether to add semantic request/response data, add an explicit AI workflow boundary, or filter irrelevant infrastructure spans. Work with the user to choose how to represent any data the app cannot safely or correctly capture. No traces → check ARIZE_SPACE_ID/ARIZE_API_KEY, init order, the configured collector endpoint/region, exporter logs (GRPC_VERBOSITY=debug); common causes: wrong region endpoint, missing project name (500), unflushed short-lived process, or export/verify credential-context mismatch (report it, don't rewrite config — references/credentials-and-config.md). For the deterministic trace-lookup sequence, blocker classification, and the post-arrival smoke check, follow references/verification.md.
After a confirmed trace
Emit milestones (install → wiring → run → export → verify); mark recovered errors resolved; end separating done from blockers. Then briefly offer the next step: arize-trace (inspect/debug), arize-dataset (curate), arize-evaluator (evals), arize-experiment (compare), arize-prompt-optimization (improve prompt). Quality issues → arize-trace first.
References
integration-routing (the router) · credentials-and-config · regions-and-endpoints · ax-profiles · manual-spans · go (Go — no doc page exists) · session-tracking · verification · tracing-assistant-mcp.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

