agentleFS
ArangoGutierrezArangoGutierrez/claude-toolkit/.claude/skills/kickoff/SKILL.md

kickoff

Skill4 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Turn a rough task opener into a scoped prompt, routed skills, and a verification checklist via a cheap tool-calling LLM that inspects the repo, then set the session goal and enter brainstorming — one command that hides /goal and brainstorming. Triggered by /kickoff <rough idea>. Fail-open: if no model is reachable or the engine is unavailable, the raw idea proceeds untouched.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 21 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run when the user types /kickoff <rough idea>.

    line 20
  2. Very specific:

    Enrich: Run (sandbox disabled — the engine reaches your inference endpoint and reads repo files) with an explicit Bash-tool timeout: 420000 …

    line 24
  3. Very specific:

    If stdout begins with KICKOFF_PASSTHROUGH: → enrichment was unavailable (engine not deployed / model unreachable).

    line 43
  4. Very specific:

    Use ONLY the commands under the engine's Acceptance (runnable): block as the Acceptance: items (these are proven runnable, so the /done …

    line 71
  5. Very specific:

    Stop/verification hook can read it, so "did verification actually run" is observable later.

    line 75

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 21 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

kickoff — agentic LLM front door

Run when the user types /kickoff <rough idea>.

Steps

  1. Enrich. Run (sandbox disabled — the engine reaches your inference endpoint and reads repo files) with an explicit Bash-tool timeout: 420000 (ms). The engine's wall-clock budget is 300s + 30s SIGALRM margin; the Bash default of 120s kills legitimate runs mid-flight and masquerades as an engine stall (2026-07-07, twice — guarded by evals/kickoff-timeout-contract.sh): Sessions running as the chief-operator agent add --profile chief so the engine compiles an orchestration plan instead of a solo prompt:
    # standard sessions — run exactly ONE of these two:
    bash ~/.claude/skills/kickoff/scripts/enrich.sh --mode interactive "<the user's rough idea>"
    # chief-operator sessions:
    bash ~/.claude/skills/kickoff/scripts/enrich.sh --mode interactive --profile chief "<the user's rough idea>"
    enrich.sh is a thin shim over python -m tool.kickoff (deployed at ~/.claude/tool/kickoff.py). The engine drives a cheap tool-calling LLM that inspects the repo via read-only tools (multi-turn) before producing the scoped prompt + routed skills + verification checklist. Capture stdout.
  2. Branch on the result.
    • If stdout begins with KICKOFF_PASSTHROUGH: → enrichment was unavailable (engine not deployed / model unreachable). Tell the user briefly, use their raw idea as the working prompt, and skip to step 4 with no checklist. Never let this block the kickoff.
    • Otherwise parse the ## Kickoff block: the Scoped prompt, Skills, Execution (solo | orchestrate), Budget (transcribed into the goal in step 3), and Verification checklist. Show it to the user.

      Each checklist item now carries a verdict ([runs; …], [BROKEN: …], [REJECTED: …], [unvalidated: …]) and the block ends with an Acceptance (runnable): list and a **Grounded in:** line naming the files the engine actually read. Broken/rejected checks are guidance only — never acceptance criteria.

  3. Set the session goal with the checklist as acceptance criteria. Invoke the goal skill (or run ~/.claude/skills/goal/goal.sh) with text formatted exactly as: (Run goal.sh with the sandbox disabled — it writes under ~/.claude/audit/, which the Bash sandbox blocks; it now fails loudly if blocked.)
    Goal: <Scoped prompt (or the raw idea on passthrough)>
    Budget: <the **Budget:** value from the Kickoff block>
    Tier: <T1|T2|T3|T4, per "Complexity tier" below>
    Acceptance:
    - <checklist item 1>
    - <checklist item 2>
    The Budget: line must start at column 0 exactly as Budget: <value> — the budget-governor Stop hook greps ^Budget: . On PASSTHROUGH, omit the Budget: line entirely (no engine value exists to transcribe). Use ONLY the commands under the engine's Acceptance (runnable): block as the Acceptance: items (these are proven runnable, so the /done Stop hook can execute them). Do not promote BROKEN/REJECTED/unvalidated checks to acceptance. This plants the verification checklist in the session goal file, where a Stop/verification hook can read it, so "did verification actually run" is observable later. (On passthrough, omit the Acceptance: items; brainstorming will establish them.)
  4. Enter the right path (first obey what the declared tier forbids: a T1 or T2 tier bars the census agent and the panel outright, and T1 also bars briefs, builders and critics):
    • Execution = solo (or passthrough) → invoke superpowers:brainstorming, seeded with the scoped prompt.
    • Execution = orchestrate → if the Kickoff block contains a Dispatch plan: section, seed from it instead of decomposing from scratch: brainstorm only the deltas (task boundaries the engine got wrong, missing tasks), then materialize per-task briefs at .superpowers/sdd/task-N-brief.md per the rendered Dispatch contract. Then drive the dispatch by dependency wave:

      • Group the Dispatch plan into dependency waves: a wave is every not-yet-run task whose deps are all satisfied by prior waves (the engine guarantees the dep graph is acyclic).
      • Per wave, invoke the chief-dispatch workflow: Workflow({name: 'chief-dispatch', args: {tasks: [{brief: '<absolute path to .superpowers/sdd/task-N-brief.md>'}, ...]}}) then read each task's status/issues from the return value before starting the next wave. A BLOCKED task blocks only its dependents, never the wave's independent siblings.
      • Fallback — run the manual chief dispatch loop (Agent tool per brief + adversarial-critic gate) when a task needs mid-flight judgment or user interaction, or when the Workflow tool is unavailable in the environment.

      Or hand the fenced JSON seed to /orchestrate for cmux-scale work. Without a Dispatch plan section, invoke superpowers:brainstorming focused on decomposing the work into disjoint, parallelizable tasks, then hand off to team-plan as before.

Complexity tier (declare before any dispatch)

The tier is declared in step 3, before step 4 dispatches anything, and it goes in the goal file so it survives compaction. Each tier names what is FORBIDDEN, not what is allowed: allow-lists get read as suggestions and ignored.

TierScopeForbidden
T1 trivial<=10 lines, 1-2 files, reversible config or docscensus agent, brief, builder, critic, panel. Chief edits directly, runs the narrowest relevant test, commits. Target under 10 minutes.
T2 smallone concern, <=100 linescensus agent, panel. Chief direct or ONE builder. Targeted tests, self-review.
T3 standardmulti-file feature or fixnothing; this is the full step 4 flow.
T4 riskysecurity, gates, migrations, multi-moduleshipping without review-verify over the whole branch.

Size the machinery to the task. A fixed-cost loop (census, brief, builder, critic) aimed at a 6-line config edit is how issue 491 drew T4 treatment for T1 work and lost the race to a 6-line MR that shipped first (2026-09-14).

The tier comes from the ask, and it is sticky. A user signal like "quick MR" is binding, not decorative. A question the source issue marks deferred or unresolved is OUT OF SCOPE by default: do not promote it into a design fork. To pull it in, ask a cheap yes/no scope question ("do you want the range in this MR at all?"), never a design fork ("how should the range work?"). The first has a default already written in the issue; the second quadrupled the work and needed a panel. Any scope expansion re-declares the tier to the user, explicitly.

The enricher is strictly additive — an enrichment failure must never block the kickoff.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.