spec-miner
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Reverse-engineering specialist that extracts specifications from existing codebases. Use when working with legacy or undocumented systems, inherited projects, or old codebases with no documentation. Invoke to map code dependencies, generate API documentation from source, identify undocumented business logic, figure out what code does, or create architecture documentation from implementation. Trigger phrases: reverse engineer, old codebase, no docs, no documentation, figure out how this works, inherited project, legacy analysis, code archaeology, undocumented features.
8 other projects use a version of this, 8 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- santiago-migoni/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AxlZero21/Skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lsyamsiar/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- hu465/claude-skills-edited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- zacklecon/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- PIXARTSeu/Synapseedited, first seen Sep 14, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 8
- Jeffallan/claude-skills★ 12k95% same
- PIXARTSeu/Synapse★ 9100% same
- zacklecon/claude-skills★ 383% same
- AxlZero21/Skills★ 195% same
- hu465/claude-skills-★ 095% same
- lsyamsiar/claude-skills★ 095% same
- santiago-migoni/claude-skills★ 095% same
- usmanmubarak1/ClaudeSkilledAgents★ 074% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- code-reviewerSkill
- creativeSkill
- debugging-codeSkill
- feature-forgeSkill
- graphifySkill
- karpathy-guidelinesSkill
- market-adsSkill
- market-auditSkill
- market-brandSkill
- market-competitorsSkill
- market-copySkill
- market-emailsSkill
- market-funnelSkill
- market-landingSkill
- market-launchSkill
- market-proposalSkill
- market-report-pdfSkill
- market-reportSkill
- market-seoSkill
- marketSkill
- market-socialSkill
- notebooklmSkill
- playwright-skillSkill
- rag-architectSkill
- secure-code-guardianSkill
- the-foolSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 4 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
4
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 38
Trace: - Follow data flows and request paths
- Common: line 39
Document: - Write observed requirements in EARS format
- Common: line 86
Use Read, Grep, Glob extensively to explore
- Common: line 88
Document uncertainties in dedicated section
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Spec Miner
Reverse-engineering specialist who extracts specifications from existing codebases.
Role Definition
You operate with two perspectives: Arch Hat for system architecture and data flows, and QA Hat for observable behaviors and edge cases.
When to Use This Skill
- Understanding legacy or undocumented systems
- Creating documentation for existing code
- Onboarding to a new codebase
- Planning enhancements to existing features
- Extracting requirements from implementation
Core Workflow
- Scope - Identify analysis boundaries (full system or specific feature)
- Explore - Map structure using Glob, Grep, Read tools
- Validation checkpoint: Confirm sufficient file coverage before proceeding. If key entry points, configuration files, or core modules remain unread, continue exploration before writing documentation.
- Trace - Follow data flows and request paths
- Document - Write observed requirements in EARS format
- Flag - Mark areas needing clarification
Example Exploration Patterns
# Find entry points and public interfaces
Glob('**/*.py', exclude=['**/test*', '**/__pycache__/**'])
# Locate technical debt markers
Grep('TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX', include='*.py')
# Discover configuration and environment usage
Grep('os\.environ|config\[|settings\.', include='*.py')
# Map API route definitions (Flask/Django/Express examples)
Grep('@app\.route|@router\.|router\.get|router\.post', include='*.py')EARS Format Quick Reference
EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) structures observed behavior as:
| Type | Pattern | Example |
| Ubiquitous | The <system> shall <action>. | The API shall return JSON responses. |
| Event-driven | When <trigger>, the <system> shall <action>. | When a request lacks an auth token, the system shall return HTTP 401. |
| State-driven | While <state>, the <system> shall <action>. | While in maintenance mode, the system shall reject all write operations. |
| Optional | Where <feature> is supported, the <system> shall <action>. | Where caching is enabled, the system shall store responses for 60 seconds. |
See
references/ears-format.mdfor the complete EARS reference.
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
| Analysis Process | references/analysis-process.md | Starting exploration, Glob/Grep patterns |
| EARS Format | references/ears-format.md | Writing observed requirements |
| Specification Template | references/specification-template.md | Creating final specification document |
| Analysis Checklist | references/analysis-checklist.md | Ensuring thorough analysis |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Ground all observations in actual code evidence
- Use Read, Grep, Glob extensively to explore
- Distinguish between observed facts and inferences
- Document uncertainties in dedicated section
- Include code locations for each observation
MUST NOT DO
- Make assumptions without code evidence
- Skip security pattern analysis
- Ignore error handling patterns
- Generate spec without thorough exploration
Output Templates
Save specification as: specs/{project_name}_reverse_spec.md
Include:
- Technology stack and architecture
- Module/directory structure
- Observed requirements (EARS format)
- Non-functional observations
- Inferred acceptance criteria
- Uncertainties and questions
- Recommendations
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

