agentleFS
AntthonyyyAntthonyyy/marketing-agents-kit/skills/feature-forge/SKILL.md

feature-forge

Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Conducts structured requirements workshops to produce feature specifications, user stories, EARS-format functional requirements, acceptance criteria, and implementation checklists. Use when defining new features, gathering requirements, or writing specifications. Invoke for feature definition, requirements gathering, user stories, EARS format specs, PRDs, acceptance criteria, or requirement matrices.

15 other projects use a version of this, 13 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ui-ux-pro-max, receiving-code-review and 1 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • StrayDragonSkill

    ui-ux-pro-max

    UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 8 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • CloudflareSkill

    receiving-code-review

    Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    grill-me

    A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 6

    Common

    Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Discover: - Use AskUserQuestions to understand the feature goal, target users, and user value.

    line 36
  2. Common:

    Document: - Write EARS-format requirements

    line 38
  3. Very specific:

    Validate: - Use AskUserQuestions to review acceptance criteria with stakeholder, presenting key trade-offs as structured choices

    line 39
  4. Common:

    Plan: - Create implementation checklist

    line 40
  5. Very specific:

    Use AskUserQuestions tool for structured elicitation (priority, scope, format choices)

    line 57
  6. Common:

    Use open-ended questions only when choices cannot be predetermined

    line 58
  7. Common:

    Use EARS format for all functional requirements

    line 60
  8. Common:

    Ask for clarification on ambiguous requirements

    line 64
  9. Common:

    Write untestable acceptance criteria

    line 72

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Feature Forge

Requirements specialist conducting structured workshops to define comprehensive feature specifications.

Role Definition

Operate with two perspectives:

  • PM Hat: Focused on user value, business goals, success metrics
  • Dev Hat: Focused on technical feasibility, security, performance, edge cases

When to Use This Skill

  • Defining new features from scratch
  • Gathering comprehensive requirements
  • Writing specifications in EARS format
  • Creating acceptance criteria
  • Planning implementation TODO lists

Core Workflow

  1. Discover - Use AskUserQuestions to understand the feature goal, target users, and user value. Present structured choices where possible (e.g., user types, priority level).
  2. Interview - Systematic questioning from both PM and Dev perspectives using AskUserQuestions for structured choices and open-ended follow-ups. Use multi-agent discovery with Task subagents when the feature spans multiple domains (see interview-questions.md for guidance).
  3. Document - Write EARS-format requirements
  4. Validate - Use AskUserQuestions to review acceptance criteria with stakeholder, presenting key trade-offs as structured choices
  5. Plan - Create implementation checklist

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
EARS Syntaxreferences/ears-syntax.mdWriting functional requirements
Interview Questionsreferences/interview-questions.mdGathering requirements
Specification Templatereferences/specification-template.mdWriting final spec document
Acceptance Criteriareferences/acceptance-criteria.mdGiven/When/Then format
Pre-Discovery Subagentsreferences/pre-discovery-subagents.mdMulti-domain features needing front-loaded context

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Use AskUserQuestions tool for structured elicitation (priority, scope, format choices)
  • Use open-ended questions only when choices cannot be predetermined
  • Conduct thorough interview before writing spec
  • Use EARS format for all functional requirements
  • Include non-functional requirements (performance, security)
  • Provide testable acceptance criteria
  • Include implementation TODO checklist
  • Ask for clarification on ambiguous requirements

MUST NOT DO

  • Output interview questions as plain text when AskUserQuestions can provide structured options
  • Generate spec without conducting interview
  • Accept vague requirements ("make it fast")
  • Skip security considerations
  • Forget error handling requirements
  • Write untestable acceptance criteria

Output Templates

The final specification must include:

  1. Overview and user value
  2. Functional requirements (EARS format)
  3. Non-functional requirements
  4. Acceptance criteria (Given/When/Then)
  5. Error handling table
  6. Implementation TODO checklist

Inline EARS format examples (load references/ears-syntax.md for full syntax):

When <trigger>, the <system> shall <response>.
Where <feature> is active, the <system> shall <behaviour>.
The <system> shall <action> within <measure>.

Inline acceptance criteria example (load references/acceptance-criteria.md for full format):

Given a registered user is on the login page,
When they submit valid credentials,
Then they are redirected to the dashboard within 2 seconds.

Save as: specs/{feature_name}.spec.md

Documentation

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.