agentleFS
AnonymXXXAnonymXXX/codex-harness-engineering/.agents/skills/domain-modeling/SKILL.md

domain-modeling

Skill3 starsChanged 16 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Capture and sharpen a project's domain language, business invariants, reusable engineering rules, and durable decisions. Use when the user defines or changes terminology, business behavior, constraints, data meaning, project rules, architectural decisions, or when another skill needs to maintain project knowledge.

195 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, decision-mapping and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 43 projects that use this

  • FabienDehopreSkill

    decision-mapping

    Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-beats

    Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

    Also in 62 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 56 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    wizard

    Generate an interactive bash wizard that walks a human through steps only they can perform. Use when provisioning infrastructure, setting up credentials or CI secrets, walking an unfamiliar third-party dashboard, or running a one-off migration or cutover. Don't invoke this for steps the agent can perform itself.

    Also in 134 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-shape

    Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.

    Also in 60 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Lesani

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 183 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before proposing or capturing a term/rule, inspect:

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Treat these as candidates for the Harness Capture Gate:

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not capture one-off preferences, temporary implementation details, speculative plans, obvious local facts, routine validation results, …

    line 31
  4. Distinctive:

    Prefer the project's existing structure.

    line 35
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep AGENTS.md short: use it as a map to durable docs, not an encyclopedia.

    line 43
  6. Distinctive:

    When a durable decision crystallizes during a task, apply all three Capture Gate conditions before writing it.

    line 47
  7. Distinctive:

    When a rule can be checked mechanically, consider a scoped executable check.

    line 49

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 183 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Domain Modeling

Analyze and sharpen project language and invariants without assuming they should be written down. Automatic durable knowledge capture must pass the Capture Gate in ~/.codex/docs/workflows/harness-engineering.md.

Explore First

Before proposing or capturing a term/rule, inspect:

  • existing AGENTS.md files;
  • project docs under docs/;
  • existing glossary, ADR, product spec, engineering rules, or execution plans;
  • code that proves or contradicts the stated behavior.

Surface contradictions clearly: "The docs say X, but the code does Y."

Capture Candidates

Treat these as candidates for the Harness Capture Gate:

  • canonical domain terms and overloaded terms;
  • business invariants and user-visible rules;
  • architecture decisions that are hard to reverse, surprising without context, and chosen after real tradeoffs;
  • workflow constraints that prevent likely repeat mistakes;
  • mechanically checkable rules that should become tests, scripts, lint rules, or CI checks.

Do not capture one-off preferences, temporary implementation details, speculative plans, obvious local facts, routine validation results, or secrets. Analysis may continue when the gate does not pass, but no file is written.

Where To Capture

Prefer the project's existing structure. If none exists:

  • docs/product-specs/ for product requirements and user-visible behavior;
  • docs/engineering-rules/ for engineering constraints, invariants, and agent rules;
  • docs/exec-plans/ for larger or interruptible plans;
  • docs/references/ for external research;
  • a small glossary file only when shared terminology is actually useful.

Keep AGENTS.md short: use it as a map to durable docs, not an encyclopedia.

Inline Discipline

When a durable decision crystallizes during a task, apply all three Capture Gate conditions before writing it. Product or operational decisions require explicit user confirmation and imminent implementation use. If existing sources conflict, report the conflict and do not choose a canonical answer automatically.

When a rule can be checked mechanically, consider a scoped executable check. Explain why none was added only when it materially affects the task or the user asks.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.