agentleFS
AnonymXXXAnonymXXX/codex-harness-engineering/.agents/skills/diagnosing-bugs/SKILL.md

diagnosing-bugs

Skill3 starsChanged 16 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Diagnose hard bugs, flakes, regressions, and performance issues through reproduction, minimization, hypothesis, instrumentation, fix, and regression testing. Use when root cause is unclear, behavior is intermittent, a first fix failed, or the user asks to debug/diagnose a problem rather than simply implement known behavior.

193 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, loop-me and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 43 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 55 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-beats

    Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

    Also in 58 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    to-questionnaire

    Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.

    Also in 88 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-shape

    Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.

    Also in 56 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    wizard

    Generate an interactive bash wizard that walks a human through steps only they can perform. Use when provisioning infrastructure, setting up credentials or CI secrets, walking an unfamiliar third-party dashboard, or running a one-off migration or cutover. Don't invoke this for steps the agent can perform itself.

    Also in 122 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Lesani
  • +2 more from aws

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 180 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not guess. Build a tight feedback loop, then fix the smallest proven cause.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Add or update a regression test at the highest practical public seam.

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    Run focused validation and applicable project-required checks.

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    If reproduction is impossible, report what was tried and what evidence is missing.

    line 23
  5. Very specific:

    Do not perform broad refactors during diagnosis unless the lack of a seam blocks regression coverage.

    line 24
  6. Very specific:

    If the bug reveals a candidate durable invariant, apply the Harness Capture Gate before writing it.

    line 25
  7. Distinctive:

    Remove temporary instrumentation before finishing unless it is intentionally retained as useful observability.

    line 26

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 180 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Diagnosing Bugs

Do not guess. Build a tight feedback loop, then fix the smallest proven cause.

Process

  1. Reproduce the bug with one command or one clearly described manual path.
  2. Minimize the reproduction until unrelated moving parts are removed.
  3. Compare expected behavior against docs, tests, specs, and code.
  4. Form one hypothesis at a time.
  5. Instrument narrowly with logs, assertions, temporary probes, or focused tests.
  6. Fix only after evidence supports the cause.
  7. Add or update a regression test at the highest practical public seam.
  8. Run focused validation and applicable project-required checks. Broaden only when the affected surface or unresolved evidence justifies it.

Guardrails

  • If reproduction is impossible, report what was tried and what evidence is missing.
  • Do not perform broad refactors during diagnosis unless the lack of a seam blocks regression coverage; in that case, use $codebase-design.
  • If the bug reveals a candidate durable invariant, apply the Harness Capture Gate before writing it; use domain-modeling when terminology or ownership needs clarification.
  • Remove temporary instrumentation before finishing unless it is intentionally retained as useful observability.

Completion

Report:

  • reproduction command or path;
  • root cause and evidence;
  • fix summary;
  • regression test added or why none was possible;
  • validation commands run.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.