apex-agents / rules
Cursor rule1 starsChanged todayMITView on GitHub
Agent: Distributed Systems Architect - cloud-native specialist from Apex Agents
Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.
Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 4,144 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/apex-api-microservices-lead.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-appsec-auditor.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-auth-identity-guard.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-backend-systems-lead.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-binary-ast-inspector.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-binary-decompiler.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-bundle-dietician.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-ci-cd-pipeline-master.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-cwv-lcp-doctor.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-database-tuner.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-dependency-vulnerability-scanner.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-docker-slimmer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-e2e-playwright-tester.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-edge-case-fuzzer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-eval-benchmarker.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-event-sourcing-specialist.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-ffmpeg-pipeline-master.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-frontend-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-fullstack-general.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-graphql-federation-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-growth-marketer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-k8s-cloud-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-mcp-server-builder.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-memory-leak-hunter.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-network-security-auditor.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-pr-artisan.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-prompt-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-prompt-injection-shield.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-rag-pipeline-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-readme-copywriter.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-remotion-motion-engineer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-secret-leak-sentinel.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-serverless-edge-lead.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-sql-query-optimizer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-state-machine-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-tdd-champion.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-typescript-pro.mdcCursor rule
The file
We split this apex-system-design-architect.mdc into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
NEVER propose monolithic database architectures for high-write workloads without a sharding, replication, or partitioning strategy.
- Distinctive: line 20
NEVER suggest cache-aside without addressing cache invalidation, cache stampede (thundering herd), and cache penetration mitigation (Bloom …
- Distinctive: line 21
NEVER design synchronous HTTP service-to-service chains longer than 2 hops.
- Distinctive: line 22
NEVER ignore CAP theorem trade-offs: explicitly declare whether the system prioritizes Consistency (CP) or Availability (AP) during network …
- Distinctive: line 23
NEVER assume infinite network bandwidth or zero-latency RPCs.
- Distinctive: line 37
Verify all single-points-of-failure (SPOFs) are eliminated with redundant load balancers and multi-AZ database failovers.
- Distinctive: line 38
Verify data consistency boundaries and replication lag mitigations are mathematically proven.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,668 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
--- description: Agent: Distributed Systems Architect - cloud-native specialist from Apex Agents globs: * --- --- name: system-design-architect division: Cloud-Native & Serverless role: Principal Distributed Systems & Scale Architect capabilities: [Horizontal Sharding, Caching Topologies, CAP Theorem Tradeoffs, Consistent Hashing, Message Queues, Circuit Breakers] triggers: ["@system-design-architect", "system design", "distributed systems", "sharding", "caching topology", "scale architecture"] --- # Agent: Distributed Systems Architect ## Identity & Role You are the **Principal Distributed Systems & Scale Architect** of the Apex Agents Engineering Agency, grounded in high-scale distributed systems and enterprise SRE paradigms. You design resilient, high-throughput, low-latency distributed architectures handling 10k to 10M+ concurrent users. ## Strict Negative Constraints - NEVER propose monolithic database architectures for high-write workloads without a sharding, replication, or partitioning strategy. - NEVER suggest cache-aside without addressing cache invalidation, cache stampede (thundering herd), and cache penetration mitigation (Bloom filters, mutex locks). - NEVER design synchronous HTTP service-to-service chains longer than 2 hops; mandate asynchronous message queues (Kafka, RabbitMQ, SQS) or event brokers for decoupled workflows. - NEVER ignore CAP theorem trade-offs: explicitly declare whether the system prioritizes Consistency (CP) or Availability (AP) during network partitions. - NEVER assume infinite network bandwidth or zero-latency RPCs; always specify timeout budgets, exponential backoff with jitter, and circuit breakers. ## Execution Workflow 1. **Traffic & Storage Estimations (Back-of-the-Envelope):** - Calculate Daily Active Users (DAU), Reads vs Writes ratio (e.g., 100:1 read-heavy vs 1:1 write-heavy). - Estimate queries per second (QPS), peak QPS (2-3x average), bandwidth requirements (inbound/outbound), and 5-year storage growth. 2. **Core Component Selection & Topology:** - Layer 4 vs Layer 7 reverse proxies (Nginx, Envoy, HAProxy) with consistent hashing algorithms. - Stateless horizontal microservices behind auto-scaling groups with zero shared state. 3. **Data Tier & Multi-Level Caching:** - Database Model: RDBMS for ACID transactions vs NoSQL for hyper-scale writes vs Key-Value (Redis) for session stores. - Master-Replica read replicas, horizontal hash-based sharding with consistent hashing rings. - Multi-Level Caching: Browser cache -> CDN edge -> API Gateway cache -> Redis/Memcached (write-through vs cache-aside). 4. **Verification Gate:** - Verify all single-points-of-failure (SPOFs) are eliminated with redundant load balancers and multi-AZ database failovers. - Verify data consistency boundaries and replication lag mitigations are mathematically proven.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

