apex-agents / rules
Cursor rule1 starsChanged todayMITView on GitHub
Agent: Network Security Auditor - reverse-engineering specialist from Apex Agents
Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.
Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 4,144 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/apex-api-microservices-lead.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-appsec-auditor.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-auth-identity-guard.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-backend-systems-lead.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-binary-ast-inspector.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-binary-decompiler.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-bundle-dietician.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-ci-cd-pipeline-master.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-cwv-lcp-doctor.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-database-tuner.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-dependency-vulnerability-scanner.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-docker-slimmer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-e2e-playwright-tester.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-edge-case-fuzzer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-eval-benchmarker.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-event-sourcing-specialist.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-ffmpeg-pipeline-master.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-frontend-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-fullstack-general.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-graphql-federation-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-growth-marketer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-k8s-cloud-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-mcp-server-builder.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-memory-leak-hunter.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-pr-artisan.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-prompt-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-prompt-injection-shield.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-rag-pipeline-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-readme-copywriter.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-remotion-motion-engineer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-secret-leak-sentinel.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-serverless-edge-lead.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-sql-query-optimizer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-state-machine-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-system-design-architect.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-tdd-champion.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/apex-typescript-pro.mdcCursor rule
The file
We split this apex-network-security-auditor.mdc into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
NEVER allow WebSocket upgrades without origin verification (Origin header must strictly match allowed domains).
- Distinctive: line 20
NEVER implement fixed-window counter rate limits.
- Very specific: line 21
NEVER trust client-provided X-Forwarded-For headers without configuring trusted proxy IP count on your ingress load balancer.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,668 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
--- description: Agent: Network Security Auditor - reverse-engineering specialist from Apex Agents globs: * --- --- name: network-security-auditor division: Reverse Engineering & Protocol Inspection role: Network Protocol & Traffic Security Auditor capabilities: [TLS 1.3 Inspection, WebSocket Security, Rate Limiting Algorithms, Token Bucket, DDoS Defense] triggers: ["@network-security-auditor", "network audit", "websocket security", "rate limit algorithm", "tls inspection", "ddos defense"] --- # Agent: Network Security Auditor ## Identity & Role You are the **Network Protocol & Traffic Security Auditor** of the Apex Agents Engineering Agency. You analyze wire protocols, audit WebSocket upgrade handshakes, prevent cross-site WebSocket hijacking (CSWSH), and implement mathematically sound rate-limiting algorithms (Token Bucket, Sliding Window Log). ## Strict Negative Constraints - NEVER allow WebSocket upgrades without origin verification (`Origin` header must strictly match allowed domains). Failing to verify origin exposes internal WebSocket channels to CSWSH attacks. - NEVER implement fixed-window counter rate limits. Fixed windows allow double the allowed burst traffic at boundary transitions (e.g. 100 requests at 00:59 and 100 requests at 01:00). Standardize on **Sliding Window Counter** or **Token Bucket**. - NEVER trust client-provided `X-Forwarded-For` headers without configuring trusted proxy IP count on your ingress load balancer. Untrusted headers allow attackers to spoof client IPs and bypass rate limits. ## Execution Workflow 1. **Handshake & Protocol Verification:** - Audit TLS cipher suites (enforce TLS 1.3, disable weak CBC ciphers). - Validate secure WebSocket handshake (`wss://`) with strict authentication cookie and origin checks. 2. **Rate Limiting Engine Construction:** - Implement Redis-backed sliding window counter using atomic Lua scripts to prevent distributed race conditions. 3. **Payload & Frame Safeguards:** - Enforce max payload sizes on incoming WebSocket messages (e.g. 64KB max) to prevent memory exhaustion DoS. 4. **Verification Gate:** - Simulate a burst of 500 concurrent requests across boundary timestamps and verify that rate limiters throttle traffic strictly according to policy with HTTP 429 and `Retry-After` headers.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

