pickup
Skill0 starsChanged 26 days agoMITView on GitHub
Show where a workspace task stands (saved next action, blockers, evidence) when the user asks to resume or asks for status without giving a concrete task.
32 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- seanmishra/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- infenia/yuktatheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- zommuter/dotclaude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- azmainadel/devloop-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- EdwardAF-IT/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- lsnackerman/raw-clauding-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ai-review, discover and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SkyWalker2506Skillai-review
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review a PR", "code review", "AI review", "check the pull request", or asks about automated review via OpenRouter or Gemma. Also activates when setting up GitHub Actions for PR review.
Also in 3 projects that use this
anombyte93Skilldiscover
Phase 1 of the prd-taskmaster pipeline: brainstorm-driven discovery. Delegates to superpowers:brainstorming in Interactive Mode (one adaptive question at a time), or self-brainstorms in Autonomous Mode when no user is present. Intercepts before the brainstorming chain hands off to writing-plans — this skill owns the exit. Extracts constraints, calibrates scale (Solo / Team / Enterprise), and advances the pipeline to GENERATE.
Also in 3 projects that use this
asterkinSkilladr
Create Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following project standards. Guides template usage, process, and best practices for documenting architecturally significant decisions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AWSSkillretro
Conduct a retrospective on a coding session.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Hugging FaceSkillimplement
Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilldesign
Design rules and conventions for the API Center Portal. Use when editing detail pages, card components, badges, layout, navigation, sidebars, or headers. Covers badge styling, metadata placement, page navigation patterns, and layout alignment.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions32 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 32
- jellydn/my-ai-tools★ 127same name
- dgilford/ai-science-toolkit★ 82same name
- oscabriel/skills★ 63same name
- lsnackerman/raw-clauding-skills★ 45same name
- iamneilroberts/claude-skills★ 26same name
- kaisa-kucherenko/claude-code-flow★ 24same name
- tingyulu/MyR2D2★ 19same name
- flurdy/agent-skills★ 9same name
- TimBroddin/skills★ 6same name
- GavinGreenwood/agentic-workflow-template★ 5same name
22 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- template/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- template/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms-full.txtllms.txt
- llms.txtllms.txt
- handoffSkill
- lessonSkill
- thinkbeforeactSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 28 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Before continuing, compare the repository and environment state against the saved handoff to check for drift:
- Distinctive: line 11
verify whether uncommitted work or unpushed commits have changed
- Distinctive: line 12
check whether failing checks or broken tests noted in the handoff have been resolved or new failures appeared If the branch changed, …
- Distinctive: line 13
If the branch changed, uncommitted work drifted, or test status differs from the saved Evidence, flag the drift to the user before resuming.
- Distinctive: line 15
If the user asked you to continue or finish the task, go on and do the saved next action (noting any detected drift first).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 28 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
If a "Saved task memory" brief is already in context, do not run ws brief again; treat its Next action and Blockers as already read, and request only missing sections such as Evidence or Handoff. Otherwise run ws brief, then read Next action, Blockers and Handoff by default: ws task show <ID> --section "Next action" --section Blockers --section Handoff, or call MCP read_task (which selects those sections by default). Request the full record only when needed: omit --section for ws task show, or pass sections: [] to MCP read_task. Do not reread the whole vault.
Before continuing, compare the repository and environment state against the saved handoff to check for drift:
- compare the current branch and working tree (
git status -sb) with the saved handoff - verify whether uncommitted work or unpushed commits have changed
- check whether failing checks or broken tests noted in the handoff have been resolved or new failures appeared If the branch changed, uncommitted work drifted, or test status differs from the saved Evidence, flag the drift to the user before resuming.
If the user asked you to continue or finish the task, go on and do the saved next action (noting any detected drift first). Otherwise state the next action, blockers, relevant evidence, and any detected drift, and ask whether to continue.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

