android-share-intents
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Android share sheets, Intent IPC, and ContentProvider boundary traps: Kotlin putExtra ArrayList serialization crashes, ACTION_SEND_MULTIPLE clipData null fallbacks, DISPLAY_NAME path traversal in cache dirs, and EXTRA_EXCLUDE_COMPONENTS recursion traps. Use when building share targets, trampolines, or handling incoming/outgoing media intents.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ci-verify-generated-codeSkill
- multi-agent-gitSkill
- anti-default-gatesSkill
- flutter-drift-androidSkill
- android-settings-wiringSkill
- rust-boundariesSkill
- windowsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
Fix: call putParcelableArrayListExtra explicitly: intent.putParcelableArrayListExtra(Intent.EXTRA_STREAM, ArrayList(uris)) (putExtra …
- Very specific: line 46
Check: test Intent(ACTION_SEND_MULTIPLE) with clipData = null and EXTRA_STREAM = arrayListOf(u1, u2).
- Distinctive: line 72
Check: test trampoline with an internal FileProvider URI.
- Very specific: line 91
Fix: after resolving refs, verify each has a literal object header: for (n in refs) if …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Android Share & Intent IPC Lessons
Lessons from building ExifDrop, an offline zero-UI share trampoline for Android. Each broke intent delivery, dropped batches silently, or breached sandbox boundaries.
1. Kotlin putExtra marks ArrayList<Uri> as Serializable over IPC
In ACTION_SEND_MULTIPLE, passing ArrayList<Uri> via intent.putExtra(Intent.EXTRA_STREAM, uris)
resolves to putExtra(String, Serializable) in Kotlin (ArrayList implements Serializable).
Android marks the extra Serializable. During Binder IPC to ActivityManagerService,
Android invokes Java serialization on each Uri instead of parceling. Custom or
HierarchicalUri instances fail or crash with NotSerializableException.
Fix: call putParcelableArrayListExtra explicitly:
intent.putParcelableArrayListExtra(Intent.EXTRA_STREAM, ArrayList(uris))
(putExtra resolves to putExtra(String, Serializable) — wrong.)
Check: grep -rn "putExtra.*EXTRA_STREAM.*ArrayList" app/ returns zero hits.
2. ACTION_SEND_MULTIPLE fallback: clipData == null drops the batch
Legacy sending apps and third-party file managers frequently send ACTION_SEND_MULTIPLE
with clipData == null, placing URIs solely in EXTRA_STREAM. If the fallback only
calls IntentCompat.getParcelableExtra(intent, Intent.EXTRA_STREAM, Uri::class.java),
it returns null because the payload is an ArrayList<Uri>. The entire batch drops silently.
Fix: branch on ACTION_SEND_MULTIPLE and call getParcelableArrayListExtra:
if (intent.action == Intent.ACTION_SEND_MULTIPLE) {
IntentCompat.getParcelableArrayListExtra(intent, Intent.EXTRA_STREAM, Uri::class.java)
?.forEach { addIfClean(it) }
}Check: test Intent(ACTION_SEND_MULTIPLE) with clipData = null and EXTRA_STREAM = arrayListOf(u1, u2).
3. Untrusted DISPLAY_NAME escapes sandbox via path traversal
OpenableColumns.DISPLAY_NAME is provider-controlled; a hostile provider sends
../../shared_prefs/app.xml, and File(cacheDir, name) traverses out.
Fix: sanitize to a bare basename (allow [a-zA-Z0-9 _-.], collapse ..,
trim dots), else fall back to a hash — then any RESULT with / or .. fails the check.
4. EXTRA_EXCLUDE_COMPONENTS is silently ignored on Android < 13
Intent.EXTRA_EXCLUDE_COMPONENTS prevents self-selection in chooser sheets, but it was
only added in API 33. On API 24–32, Android silently ignores it, causing infinite re-share loops.
Fix: pair EXTRA_EXCLUDE_COMPONENTS with an internal URI authority loop-breaker:
// In outgoing chooser (API 33+):
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 33) {
chooser.putExtra(Intent.EXTRA_EXCLUDE_COMPONENTS, arrayOf(ComponentName(packageName, TrampolineActivity::class.java.name)))
}
// In incoming receiver (API 24-36 loop-breaker):
if (uri.authority == "$packageName.fileprovider") returnCheck: test trampoline with an internal FileProvider URI; verify it drops without opening chooser.
5. image/* claims what you can't strip: whitelist, or ship dirty silently
image/* feeds SVG/GIF/BMP/HEIC into exifinterface, which has no segment to
parse — the file passes through byte-identical with XML metadata intact under a
"stripped" guarantee.
Fix: fail closed in prepare() — accept only provable types:
if (mime !in setOf("image/jpeg","image/png","image/webp","application/pdf")) return null
Check: share an SVG → skipped-toast, original untouched, nothing dirty.
6. Object streams: /Info N 0 R guard passes, PDF ships dirty
ObjStm detection only refuses when NO /Info//Metadata ref exists. Trailer
with /Info 3 0 R where object 3 is packed compressed inside the ObjStm (no
literal 3 0 obj) → the regex blankers no-op, metadata ships.
Fix: after resolving refs, verify each has a literal object header:
for (n in refs) if (!Regex("""(?<!\d)$n\s+0\s+obj""").containsMatchIn(s)) throw IllegalArgumentException(...)
Check: /Info 3 0 R + obj 3 inside ObjStm → throws, never a dirty hand-off.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

