changelog-generate
Skill2 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub
Generates changelogs and release notes from git commits, PR/MR titles, and issue references. Auto-detects the forge (GitHub or GitLab) and whether the repo uses tags, adapting reference links and skipping tag/version steps for tag-less repos. Organizes changes by impact type (breaking, features, fixes, improvements) and formats to the Keep a Changelog standard. Use when users request "create changelog", "write release notes", "document version changes", or "prepare release".
- Installs packages
- Commits and pushes
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
No longer tracked by npx skills — edit freely.
- Distinctive: line 18
Determine the range: if tags exist → since the last tag.
- Distinctive: line 23
Format document: Follow Keep a Changelog format, using forge-correct PR/MR & issue links.
- Distinctive: line 25
Generate release notes: Create a user-friendly summary.
- Distinctive: line 29
Run these before anything else and let the results drive the whole output:
- Distinctive: line 54
Do NOT print the "No names found" fatal error to the user — treat it as the signal "this repo doesn't tag," not an error.
- Distinctive: line 63
Commit messages (preferably conventional commits)
- Very specific: line 83
Forge-agnostic (no remote / unknown host): keep the raw IDs as plain text (!3025, #123) and emit no hyperlinks.
- Very specific: line 444
Link issues/PRs/MRs: use the detected forge's syntax — GitHub #123, GitLab MRs !123 & issues #123
- Distinctive: line 449
Follow conventions: Keep a Changelog format
- Distinctive: line 450
Semantic versioning: Use correctly
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Own skill. Originally adapted from patricio0312rev/skills@changelog-writer, then
customized (forge auto-detection for GitHub/GitLab, tag-less repo handling).
No longer tracked by `npx skills` — edit freely; updates will not overwrite it. -->Changelog & Release Notes Generator
Generate professional changelogs and release notes from version control history.
Core Workflow
- Detect repo context (ALWAYS run first — see "Detect Repo Context" below): which forge (GitHub / GitLab / other) and whether the repo uses tags. Everything downstream branches on this.
- Determine the range: if tags exist → since the last tag; if NOT → ask the user for an explicit range (two commits/branches) or default to a sensible window. Never say "since last release" when there are no releases.
- Analyze commits: Parse git history over that range.
- Categorize changes: Group by type (feat, fix, docs, etc.).
- Identify breaking changes: Flag incompatible changes.
- Extract highlights: Surface most important changes.
- Format document: Follow Keep a Changelog format, using forge-correct PR/MR & issue links.
- Suggest version (only if the repo uses tags / semver): recommend a semantic version bump. If the repo is tag-less, SKIP this and every tag step — do not emit
git tag,gh release, compare-by-tag links, or a## [x.y.z]heading. - Generate release notes: Create a user-friendly summary.
Detect Repo Context (run first)
Run these before anything else and let the results drive the whole output:
# 1. Which forge? Inspect the remote URL — check ALL remotes, not just origin.
git remote -v
# contains "github.com" → GitHub (PRs use #123, path /pull/NN, /issues/NN, /compare/a...b)
# contains "gitlab" (any host) → GitLab (MRs use !123, path /-/merge_requests/NN, /-/issues/NN, /-/compare/a...b)
# neither / no remote → forge-agnostic: reference IDs as plain text, emit NO web links
# 1b. Self-hosted forges rarely put "github"/"gitlab" in the hostname (e.g. atlantis.example.com).
# The RELIABLE signal is the merge-request reference syntax used in commit history:
git log -80 --pretty=%s%n%b | grep -oE '![0-9]{2,6}' | head # any '!NN' hits → GitLab (MRs)
# → '!NN' merge-request refs anywhere in history ⇒ GitLab, even if the host isn't "gitlab"
# → only '#NN' refs and a `gh`-style remote ⇒ GitHub
# → `glab` configured / used in the project ⇒ GitLab
# Once GitLab is confirmed, derive the base URL from the CANONICAL/upstream remote
# (MRs live on the shared repo, not a personal fork): http://host[:port]/group/repo/-/merge_requests/NN
# 2. Does this repo use tags at all? (git tag exits 0 even when EMPTY — never rely on its exit code)
[ -z "$(git tag)" ] && echo "TAG-LESS" || echo "HAS TAGS: $(git tag | wc -l) tags"
git describe --tags --abbrev=0 2>/dev/null # "fatal: No names found" also ⇒ TAG-LESSTAG-LESS repos are normal and expected (large app monorepos, trunk-based teams that ship from dev/main without version tags). When tag-less:
- Do NOT print the "No names found" fatal error to the user — treat it as the signal "this repo doesn't tag," not an error.
- Work from an explicit commit/branch range instead of a tag range.
- Omit version headings, semver suggestions,
git tag,gh release create, and compare-by-tag links from the output. Use a commit-range compare link (or none) instead. - The changelog goes under a single
## [Unreleased](or a dated## <date> — <feature/scope>heading), not## [1.2.0].
Commit Analysis
Extract Information From
- Commit messages (preferably conventional commits)
- PR / MR titles and descriptions
- Issue & PR/MR references (see forge table below)
- Merge commit messages (e.g.
Merge branch 'feat/x' into 'dev'— the branch name often names the feature) - Commit authors
Reference Syntax & Links by Forge
Detect the forge once, then use the matching column everywhere:
| Reference | GitHub | GitLab |
| Pull / Merge req | #123 → /pull/123 | !123 → /-/merge_requests/123 |
| Issue | #123 → /issues/123 | #123 → /-/issues/123 |
| Commit | /commit/<sha> | /-/commit/<sha> |
| Compare / range | /compare/a...b | /-/compare/a...b |
- GitLab uses
!NNfor merge requests and#NNfor issues — don't collapse both into#. GitLab-convention commits reference MRs as!3025,!3026. - Self-hosted GitLab often has no "gitlab" in the hostname (e.g.
atlantis.example.com:9991). Trust the!NNMR-ref signal from history over the hostname. Derive the base URL from the canonical/upstream remote — MRs live on the shared repo, not a personal fork. - Build full links only when a remote exists. Strip any
.gitsuffix and normalizegit@host:group/repoSSH remotes tohttps://host/group/repo(keep the:portfor self-hostedhttp://host:port/...). - Forge-agnostic (no remote / unknown host): keep the raw IDs as plain text (
!3025,#123) and emit no hyperlinks.
Parse Patterns
feat(auth): add OAuth2 support
^ ^ ^
| | └─ Description
| └─ Scope (optional)
└─ TypeTypes to Categories:
feat→ Addedfix→ Fixeddocs→ Documentationstyle,refactor→ Changedperf→ Performancetest→ Testingchore,ci→ InternalBREAKING CHANGE→ Breaking Changes
Changelog Format (Keep a Changelog)
# Changelog
All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/),
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
## [Unreleased]
### Added
- New feature X
- Support for Y
### Changed
- Updated Z behavior
### Fixed
- Resolved issue #123
## [2.1.0] - 2024-01-15
### Added
- OAuth2 authentication support
- User profile management API
- Dark mode toggle
### Changed
- Improved error messages
- Updated dependencies to latest versions
### Deprecated
- Legacy authentication method (will be removed in 3.0.0)
### Fixed
- Memory leak in WebSocket connection
- Incorrect date formatting in reports
- Race condition in concurrent requests
### Security
- Patched XSS vulnerability in user input
## [2.0.0] - 2023-12-01
### Breaking Changes
- ⚠️ Removed support for Node.js 16
- ⚠️ Changed API response format for `/users` endpoint
- ⚠️ Renamed `config.yaml` to `config.yml`
### Added
- Complete API rewrite with improved performance
- WebSocket support for real-time updates
### Migration Guide
See [MIGRATION_v2.md](./docs/MIGRATION_v2.md) for upgrade instructions.
[unreleased]: https://github.com/user/project/compare/v2.1.0...HEAD
[2.1.0]: https://github.com/user/project/compare/v2.0.0...v2.1.0
[2.0.0]: https://github.com/user/project/releases/tag/v2.0.0Release Notes Format
# Release v2.1.0 - "Feature Release Name"
Released: January 15, 2024
## 🎉 Highlights
This release brings major improvements to authentication and user experience:
- **OAuth2 Support**: Users can now sign in with Google, GitHub, and Microsoft
- **Dark Mode**: Toggle between light and dark themes
- **Performance**: 40% faster API response times
## ✨ New Features
- OAuth2 authentication with popular providers (#456)
- User profile management API (#478)
- Dark mode toggle in settings (#492)
- Export data in CSV format (#501)
## 🐛 Bug Fixes
- Fixed memory leak in WebSocket connections (#489)
- Resolved incorrect date formatting in reports (#495)
- Fixed race condition in concurrent API requests (#503)
## 🔄 Changes
- Improved error messages across the application
- Updated all dependencies to latest stable versions
- Refined UI animations for smoother experience
## 🔒 Security
- Patched XSS vulnerability in user input validation
- Updated JWT library to address CVE-2024-1234
## 📚 Documentation
- Added OAuth2 setup guide
- Updated API reference with new endpoints
- Improved troubleshooting section
## 🙏 Contributors
Thank you to all contributors who made this release possible:
- @alice - OAuth2 implementation
- @bob - Dark mode feature
- @charlie - Bug fixes and testing
## 📦 Installation
```bash
npm install project-name@2.1.0
# or
yarn add project-name@2.1.0
```🔗 Links
- Full Changelog
- Documentation
- Migration Guide
Note: This is a minor release. No breaking changes. Safe to upgrade from 2.0.x.
## Semantic Versioning Rules
Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH (e.g., 2.1.0):
1. **MAJOR** (2.x.x → 3.x.x)
- Breaking changes
- Incompatible API changes
- Removed features
2. **MINOR** (2.1.x → 2.2.x)
- New features
- Backward-compatible functionality
- Deprecated features
3. **PATCH** (2.1.0 → 2.1.1)
- Bug fixes
- Security patches
- Performance improvements
**Special versions:**
- `0.x.x` - Initial development (breaking changes allowed in minor)
- `x.y.0-alpha.1` - Pre-release
- `x.y.0-beta.2` - Beta release
- `x.y.0-rc.1` - Release candidate
## Git Commands for Changelog Generation
**If the repo HAS tags:**
```bash
# Commits since last tag
git log $(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)..HEAD --oneline
# Commits between two tags
git log v2.0.0..v2.1.0 --oneline
```
**If the repo is TAG-LESS** (use an explicit range — a feature branch merge, a date, or two SHAs):
```bash
# By explicit commit range (what you'll usually use here)
git log <old-sha>..<new-sha> --pretty=format:"%h | %ad | %aN | %s" --date=short
# Since a date (trunk-based teams shipping from dev/main)
git log --since="2026-07-01" --pretty=format:"%h | %ad | %aN | %s" --date=short
# Scope to one feature/module by grepping subjects (e.g. payments)
git log <range> --pretty=format:"%h %s" | grep -Ei 'payment|reconcil|gateway'
```
**Forge-neutral helpers (work with any range `R`, tagged or not):**
```bash
# Contributors in range
git log R --format='%aN' | sort -u
# Merge commits (GitLab 'Merge branch ... into ...' lines name the feature branch)
git log --merges --pretty=format:"%s" R
# Pull down MR/issue IDs referenced in bodies — GitLab !NN and #NN, GitHub #NN
git log R --pretty=format:'%b' | grep -oE '[!#][0-9]+' | sort -u
# Commit count by type
git log R --oneline | grep -oE '(feat|fix|docs|perf|refactor|chore)(\([^)]*\))?' | cut -d'(' -f1 | sort | uniq -cBreaking Changes Detection
Look for these indicators:
- Commit message contains
BREAKING CHANGE: - Commit type has
!(e.g.,feat!:) - PR labeled with "breaking-change"
- Major dependency updates
- API endpoint changes
- Config file format changes
Document clearly:
### Breaking Changes
⚠️ **API Response Format Changed**
The `/api/users` endpoint now returns:
```json
// Before
{ "data": [...] }
// After
{ "users": [...], "total": 100 }
```Migration: Update your API client to access users instead of data.
## Automation Tools
### Using conventional-changelog
```bash
npm install -g conventional-changelog-cli
# Generate changelog
conventional-changelog -p angular -i CHANGELOG.md -s
# Generate for specific version
conventional-changelog -p angular -i CHANGELOG.md -s -r 0Using git-cliff
# Install git-cliff
cargo install git-cliff
# Generate changelog
git-cliff --tag v2.1.0 > CHANGELOG.md
# Generate release notes
git-cliff --tag v2.1.0 --unreleasedRelease Script — TAG-BASED repos only
Skip this entire section for tag-less repos. Only offer it when
git tagreturned results.
GitHub:
#!/bin/bash
VERSION="v1.2.3" # pass the version as an argument or edit here
PREVIOUS_TAG=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)
gh release create "$VERSION" \
--title "Release $VERSION" \
--notes "$(git log $PREVIOUS_TAG..HEAD --pretty=format:'- %s')"GitLab (via glab):
#!/bin/bash
VERSION="v1.2.3" # pass the version as an argument or edit here
PREVIOUS_TAG=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)
glab release create "$VERSION" \
--name "Release $VERSION" \
--notes "$(git log $PREVIOUS_TAG..HEAD --pretty=format:'- %s')"User-Facing vs Developer-Facing
User-Facing (Release Notes)
- Focus on benefits and features
- Less technical jargon
- Include screenshots/demos
- Highlight user experience improvements
- Provide upgrade instructions
Developer-Facing (Changelog)
- Technical details
- API changes
- Breaking changes with migration guides
- Dependencies updates
- Internal refactorings
Templates by Project Type
Library/Package
Focus on: API changes, breaking changes, new methods
Application
Focus on: New features, bug fixes, UI improvements
CLI Tool
Focus on: New commands, flag changes, behavior changes
API Service
Focus on: Endpoint changes, performance, security
Best Practices
- Be specific: "Fixed login bug" → "Fixed session timeout on mobile"
- Link issues/PRs/MRs: use the detected forge's syntax — GitHub
#123, GitLab MRs!123& issues#123 - Credit contributors: Acknowledge work
- Highlight impact: Mark breaking changes clearly
- Group logically: By type, not chronologically
- Update regularly: With each release
- Follow conventions: Keep a Changelog format
- Semantic versioning: Use correctly
Changelog Entry Examples
Good Examples
### Added
- OAuth2 authentication support (#456) - @alice
- Export data in CSV format with custom column selection (#501)
### Fixed
- Resolved memory leak in WebSocket connections affecting long-running sessions (#489)
- Fixed race condition in concurrent API requests that caused data inconsistency (#503)Bad Examples
### Added
- Added stuff
- New feature
### Fixed
- Fixed bug
- UpdatesVersion Suggestion Algorithm
Only run this if the repo uses tags. For tag-less repos there is no baseline to bump from — skip version suggestion entirely and label the section
## [Unreleased]or## <date> — <scope>. Do NOT invent av0.1.0unless the user explicitly asks to start tagging.
If breaking changes detected:
MAJOR++, MINOR=0, PATCH=0
Else if new features:
MINOR++, PATCH=0
Else if only fixes:
PATCH++Release Checklist
Before publishing release:
- Review all commits since last release
- Identify breaking changes
- Categorize changes properly
- Update CHANGELOG.md
- Write release notes
- Update version in package.json/pyproject.toml
- Create git tag
- Push tag to trigger CI/CD
- Publish to package registry (npm, PyPI, etc.)
- Create GitHub release with notes
- Announce on relevant channels
Output Checklist
Always provide:
- Formatted CHANGELOG.md following Keep a Changelog
- Release notes draft (user-friendly)
- Breaking changes clearly marked
- Migration guide for breaking changes
- Forge-correct references (GitHub
#//pull/; GitLab!//-/merge_requests/) — or plain-text IDs if no remote
Provide ONLY if the repo uses tags:
- Semantic version suggestion (X.Y.Z)
- Git tag command to run
- Links to compare view (tag..tag)
Skip the tag-only items silently for tag-less repos — do not surface git describe errors or suggest starting to tag unless the user asks.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- AhmedMerza/claude-skills★ 2100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- animateSkill
- api-docs-completeSkill
- best-optionSkill
- browseSkill
- checkpointSkill
- claimSkill
- commitSkill
- courtSkill
- design-driftSkill
- designSkill
- expandSkill
- explainSkill
- fix-reviewSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handover-listSkill
- handover-resumeSkill
- handover-saveSkill
- i18n-syncSkill
- issueSkill
- leadSkill
- mr-approveSkill
- mr-assignSkill
- mr-createSkill
- mr-guideSkill
- mr-listSkill
- mr-mergeSkill
- mr-review-requestSkill
- mr-reviewSkill
- mr-statusSkill
- persona-walkthroughSkill
- ponytailSkill
- prove-the-testSkill
- qa-crawlSkill
- qa-sweepSkill
- reflectSkill
- reviewSkill
- root-causeSkill
- scoutSkill
- second-opinionSkill
- ship-checkSkill
- skill-auditSkill
- skill-compareSkill
- spinoffSkill
- story-siteSkill
- tool-compareSkill
- ui-auditSkill
- ui-polishSkill
- usage-weekSkill
- ux-auditSkill
- validate-planSkill
- video-teardownSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- where-were-weSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

