agentleFS
Above-the-Fold-StudioAbove-the-Fold-Studio/designmd-skills/skills/accessible-interface/SKILL.md

accessible-interface

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Design and review inclusive interfaces for keyboard, screen-reader, cognitive, and visual access.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not claim full accessibility from static inspection or automated tooling.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not replace native semantics with custom ARIA when a native element meets the need.

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    Start with semantic HTML and established platform behavior.

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    Check keyboard reachability, logical order, visible focus, focus movement, escape behavior, and prevention of keyboard traps.

    line 20
  5. Distinctive:

    Check names, roles, values, relationships, headings, landmarks, live updates, error association, and status communication for assistive …

    line 22
  6. Distinctive:

    Check text and graphical contrast, zoom and reflow, touch targets, motion alternatives, reduced-motion behavior, and color independence.

    line 25
  7. Distinctive:

    Test empty, loading, error, disabled, selected, expanded, and completed states.

    line 29
  8. Distinctive:

    Use automated checks to find classes of defects, then perform keyboard and relevant assistive-technology checks.

    line 31

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Accessible Interface

Make an interface perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust for people using different inputs, outputs, zoom levels, and cognitive strategies. Use this throughout design and implementation, not only as a final checklist.

Do not claim full accessibility from static inspection or automated tooling. Do not replace native semantics with custom ARIA when a native element meets the need.

Workflow

  1. Identify the user task, interaction pattern, content structure, and states. Start with semantic HTML and established platform behavior.
  2. Check keyboard reachability, logical order, visible focus, focus movement, escape behavior, and prevention of keyboard traps.
  3. Check names, roles, values, relationships, headings, landmarks, live updates, error association, and status communication for assistive technologies.
  4. Check text and graphical contrast, zoom and reflow, touch targets, motion alternatives, reduced-motion behavior, and color independence.
  5. Reduce cognitive load with predictable placement, plain labels, visible instructions, recoverable actions, and preserved user input.
  6. Test empty, loading, error, disabled, selected, expanded, and completed states. Include long content and localization.
  7. Use automated checks to find classes of defects, then perform keyboard and relevant assistive-technology checks. State what was not tested.
  8. Prioritize blockers to task completion, then serious confusion or loss, then efficiency and polish.

Output

Return findings by user impact, affected users and task, evidence, concrete remediation, verification method, and explicit test limitations.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.