agentleFS
AbilityaiAbilityai/cornelius/.claude/skills/get-perspective-on/SKILL.md

get-perspective-on

Skill109 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub

Extract the user's perspective on a topic (called by a content agent or user)

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Look for contrarian or non-obvious angles

    line 42
  2. Distinctive:

    When a content agent calls via headless mode:

    line 77
  3. Distinctive:

    Always cite permanent notes

    line 123

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Get Perspective On

Extract the user's unique perspective on a topic from the knowledge base. Returns brief, focused insights (not full article). Can be called directly by user or via content agent in headless mode.

Usage

/get-perspective-on <topic or question>

Parameters

  • topic or question: What perspective to retrieve
    • Specific topic
    • Question format
    • Comparison
    • Application

Examples

/get-perspective-on AI agent adoption barriers
/get-perspective-on Why do companies resist AI?
/get-perspective-on How dopamine relates to social media
/get-perspective-on What's contrarian about my AI views?

Workflow

  1. Search Knowledge Base - read role: voice (contract: scope-mount): this is the user's perspective, so the read is pinned to core explicitly, never widened and never inherited. Books/ and Document Insights/ are what he has read, not his view - they do not belong in a perspective answer.
    BRAIN_READ_SCOPE=core resources/local-brain-search/run_search.sh "<topic>" --mode spreading --limit 8 --json
    BRAIN_READ_SCOPE=core resources/local-brain-search/run_connections.sh "<top note>" --json
    • Find 3-5 most relevant permanent notes
    • Look for contrarian or non-obvious angles
  2. Synthesize Perspective
    • Brief format (1-3 paragraphs)
    • Focus on unique angles
    • Cite specific permanent notes
    • Include "why this matters"
  3. Return Response
    • For direct user: Display perspective with citations
    • For a content agent headless: Return text for content use

Output Format

🧠 the user's Perspective: [Topic]

[1-3 paragraphs synthesizing unique insights from permanent notes]

Key insights:
- [Insight 1 from [[Note A]]]
- [Insight 2 from [[Note B]]]
- [Insight 3 connecting [[Note C]] and [[Note D]]]

Why this matters:
[Brief explanation of significance or application]

📝 Cited Notes:
- [[Note Title 1]]
- [[Note Title 2]]
- [[Note Title 3]]

Integration with a content agent

When a content agent calls via headless mode:

cd $PROJECT_ROOT
claude -p "/get-perspective-on 'AI adoption barriers'" --output-format json

Caller scope: this is the workstation invocation path - a content agent runs on the user's machine with an authenticated Claude Code CLI. A caller running inside a Trinity container cannot use claude -p (turn-scoped credentials, plus the ent#643 no-CLI-subprocess rule); it must call chat_with_agent("cornelius", "...") over Trinity MCP instead.

a content agent receives:

{
  "result": "[Perspective text with citations]",
  "total_cost_usd": 0.34
}

Quality Criteria

Good perspective: ✅ Cites 3-5 specific permanent notes ✅ Highlights contrarian or non-obvious angles ✅ Connects to broader themes ✅ Includes concrete examples ✅ Authentic your voice

Weak perspective (regenerate): ❌ Generic AI knowledge ❌ No specific note citations ❌ Surface-level analysis ❌ Lacks unique angles

Use Cases

  • Quick content ideas for social posts
  • Video script foundations
  • Article brainstorming
  • Perspective validation
  • Connection discovery

Notes

  • Keep brief (1-3 paragraphs)
  • Focus on what's unique to the user's thinking
  • Always cite permanent notes
  • Emphasize non-obvious connections
  • Cost: ~$0.30-0.40 per call

State Dependencies

SourceLocationReadWriteDescription
Brain notesBrain/**/*.mdXPermanent notes for perspective synthesis
AI InsightsBrain/AI Extracted Notes/XAI-extracted unique perspectives
Document InsightsBrain/Document Insights/XResearch-based insights
Local Brain Searchresources/local-brain-search/XSemantic search for relevance

Completion Checklist

  • Knowledge base searched for topic
  • 3-5 most relevant permanent notes identified
  • Contrarian or non-obvious angles prioritized
  • Perspective synthesized (1-3 paragraphs)
  • Specific permanent notes cited
  • "Why this matters" included
  • Output formatted for user or a content agent consumption

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.