agentleFS
AbilityaiAbilityai/cornelius/.claude/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md

deep-research

Skill109 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub

Autonomous research pipeline - discover, extract, and integrate cutting-edge insights into knowledge base

196 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    ph-community-outreach

    Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • W-MoorerSkill

    academic-paper-reviewer

    Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • W-MoorerSkill

    academic-pipeline

    Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • xfstudioSkill

    micro-saas-launcher

    Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • stophobiaSkill

    surprise-me

    Create a delightful, unexpected "wow" experience for the user by dynamically discovering and creatively combining other enabled skills. Triggers when the user says "surprise me" or any request expressing a desire for an unexpected creative showcase. Also triggers when the user is bored, wants inspiration, or asks for "something interesting".

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +4 more from nicepkg
  • +1 more from W-Moorer

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

29 rules. 0 are common, 27 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 27

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Critical Requirement: ALL extracted insights MUST be stored in Document Insights folder structure to keep separate from main Brain.

    line 28
  2. Distinctive:

    Add empirical validation to intuitive frameworks

    line 63
  3. Distinctive:

    Use Task tool with subagent_type='research-specialist':

    line 87
  4. Distinctive:

    Sequential: Run topics one-by-one if they're related (later research can reference earlier findings)

    line 144
  5. Distinctive:

    Parallel: Run multiple topics simultaneously if they're independent domains

    line 145
  6. Distinctive:

    After each research agent completes:

    line 150
  7. Distinctive:

    Verify comprehensive coverage (15-25+ papers)

    line 152
  8. Distinctive:

    Check for citations and empirical data

    line 153
  9. Distinctive:

    Use Task tool with subagent_type='document-insight-extractor':

    line 172
  10. Distinctive:

    Verify insights stored in correct Document Insights session folder

    line 228
  11. Distinctive:

    Check changelog was created

    line 229
  12. Distinctive:

    If the interview ran, Phase 5 should map connections across both:

    line 263
  13. Distinctive:

    Run connection-finder once on the entire session folder

    line 276
  14. Distinctive:

    Run connection-finder 2-3 times on different subsets

    line 280
  15. Distinctive:

    Use Task tool with subagent_type='connection-finder':

    line 289
  16. Very specific:

    Verify changelog created in /Brain/05-Meta/Changelogs/

    line 341
  17. Distinctive:

    Check master CHANGELOG.md was updated

    line 342
  18. Distinctive:

    Cross-domain potential: Prefer topics that bridge multiple knowledge base hubs

    line 519
  19. Very specific:

    Rigor: Prefer primary sources (the actual paper/lab/official doc) over summaries.

    line 525
  20. Distinctive:

    Novelty: Only extract genuinely new perspectives

    line 531
  21. Distinctive:

    Deduplication: ALWAYS search before creating notes

    line 532
  22. Distinctive:

    Comprehensive changelogs: Document every phase

    line 544
  23. Distinctive:

    Master log updates: Keep CHANGELOG.md current

    line 546
  24. Distinctive:

    Document limitation in summary

    line 573
  25. Distinctive:

    Look for empirical validation of concepts

    line 577
  26. Distinctive:

    Consider topic was already well-covered

    line 579
  27. Distinctive:

    Run additional passes on specific hubs

    line 584
  28. Distinctive:

    Document gap as synthesis opportunity

    line 585
  29. Distinctive:

    Document error in summary

    line 588

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Deep Research & Knowledge Integration Pipeline

You are orchestrating a fully autonomous research → extraction → connection discovery workflow to expand the knowledge base with cutting-edge insights.

Input Processing

User Input: $ARGUMENTS

Execution Modes:

  1. Directed Mode - User specifies topic(s): $ARGUMENTS = "neuroscience of habits" or $ARGUMENTS = "multi-agent systems, safety alignment"
  2. Autonomous Mode - You select topics: $ARGUMENTS = "" or $ARGUMENTS = "auto"

Mission

Execute a complete 3-phase autonomous research pipeline:

  1. RESEARCH - Gather cutting-edge papers and developments
  2. EXTRACT - Pull unique insights from research findings
  3. CONNECT - Map connections to existing knowledge base

Critical Requirement: ALL extracted insights MUST be stored in Document Insights folder structure to keep separate from main Brain.


Phase 1: Topic Selection & Research Planning

A. If User Provided Topic(s) (Directed Mode)

  • Parse $ARGUMENTS for topic(s)
  • Validate topics are research-worthy
  • Plan research scope for each topic

B. If Autonomous Mode

Analyze knowledge base to identify research opportunities:

  1. Read knowledge base analysis:
    cat knowledge-base-analysis.md
  2. Check recent activity:
    ls -lt Brain/Document\ Insights/ | head -10
  3. Identify gaps based on:
    • Underrepresented domains in knowledge-base-analysis.md
    • Missing connections flagged in recent changelogs
    • Emerging themes from existing insights
    • User's recent work patterns
    • CLAUDE.md priorities and future directions
  4. Select 1-3 research topics that would:
    • Fill identified gaps
    • Build on existing strengths (e.g., Buddhism-Neuroscience-AI triangle)
    • Connect underexplored domains
    • Add empirical validation to intuitive frameworks
    • Challenge or extend current thinking

Examples of Good Topic Selection:

  • "Neuroscience of habits and behavior change" (if habit formation underrepresented)
  • "Collective intelligence and swarm behavior" (if group dynamics missing)
  • "Embodied cognition and interoception" (if embodiment gap identified)
  • "Complexity science and emergence" (if systems thinking needed)
  • "Creativity neuroscience and insight generation" (if creative process mechanics missing)

Phase 2: Execute Research

Get Current Timestamp

date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z'

Save this for session folder naming: YYYY-MM-DD Topic Description

Launch Research Specialist Agent(s)

For Each Topic:

Use Task tool with subagent_type='research-specialist':

TOPIC: [Selected topic]

Conduct comprehensive research on [topic] focusing EXCLUSIVELY on the most recent research and developments.

⚠️ CRITICAL RECENCY REQUIREMENT:
Your training data may be outdated. The world changes rapidly, especially in fast-moving fields like AI, neuroscience, and technology. You MUST prioritize the most recent information available through web search, even if it contradicts what you think you know from training data.

⚠️ SOURCE QUALITY REQUIREMENT (recency is NOT enough):
Recent does not mean credible. Prefer the PRIMARY source over anyone summarizing it - the actual paper, lab page, or official doc, not a content-farm writeup, an AI-generated summary, a single-tweet leak, or an SEO explainer. Reject machine-generated and regurgitated material. For each finding, record which source it came from so downstream extraction can tier it. (The per-domain source diet is the canonical `resources/SOURCE-AUTHORITY.md`; the document-insight-extractor applies it at extraction time.)

SEARCH STRATEGY:
- Use Google Search grounding to find papers published in the last 12-18 months
- Explicitly search for "2024", "2025", "2026", "recent", "latest" in queries
- Check paper publication dates - reject anything older than 2024 unless foundational
- Look for preprints, conference proceedings, and recent journal publications
- Prioritize arXiv papers from last 6 months, conference papers from 2024-2026
- Search for "state of the art [topic] 2025" or "[topic] breakthrough 2026"

RESEARCH REQUIREMENTS:

1. **Target Sources (RECENT ONLY):**
   - arXiv preprints (2024-2026, prioritize last 6 months)
   - Major conferences 2024-2026 (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AAAI, ACL, EMNLP, etc.)
   - Leading AI labs recent publications (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Microsoft Research)
   - Top-tier journals (2024-2026 issues only)
   - Industry whitepapers and blog posts from major tech companies (last 12 months)
   - Recent preprints and working papers

2. **Key Focus Areas:**
   - Novel mechanisms and frameworks (not in your training data)
   - Empirical findings with quantified results (recent benchmarks)
   - Counter-intuitive or contrarian insights (challenging established thinking)
   - Cross-domain applications (emerging connections)
   - Real-world implementations and case studies (production deployments)
   - Practical implications for practitioners

3. **Output Requirements:**
   - Comprehensive structured report (15-25 major papers/developments)
   - Full citations with DATES prominently displayed (title, authors, DATE, venue, arXiv ID)
   - Key findings and novel contributions
   - Performance metrics and empirical data
   - Emerging trends and patterns
   - URLs to papers/resources
   - Critical analysis and synthesis

4. **Save Location:**
   resources/[Topic-Slug]-Research-Report-YYYY-MM-DD.md

VERIFICATION: Before finalizing, verify that 80%+ of papers are from 2024-2026. If not, search again with more explicit recency filters. Also verify the sources are credible primaries (actual papers/labs/official docs), not content-farm pages or AI-generated summaries.

Use Gemini AI with Google Search grounding. Trust the search results over your training data.

Strategy Considerations:

  • Sequential: Run topics one-by-one if they're related (later research can reference earlier findings)
  • Parallel: Run multiple topics simultaneously if they're independent domains
  • Your choice - decide based on topic relationships and efficiency

Monitor Research Output

After each research agent completes:

  1. Note the report file path
  2. Verify comprehensive coverage (15-25+ papers)
  3. Check for citations and empirical data
  4. Confirm report saved in /resources/ directory

Phase 3: Extract Insights

Create Session Folder

Format: YYYY-MM-DD [Topic Description]

Example: 2025-11-20 Neuroscience of Habits and Behavior Change

Path: Brain/Document Insights/[Session-Folder]/

Launch Document Insight Extractor

For Each Research Report:

Use Task tool with subagent_type='document-insight-extractor':

Extract unique insights from the research report for the knowledge base.

SOURCE DOCUMENT: [Full path to research report]

SESSION FOLDER: [Session folder name]

EXTRACTION GUIDELINES:

1. **Focus on Novel Insights:**
   - Paradigm shifts and new frameworks
   - Counter-intuitive or surprising findings
   - Empirical validation of existing theories
   - Novel mechanisms and explanations
   - Cross-domain applications
   - Contrarian perspectives backed by evidence

2. **Bridge to Existing Knowledge Base:**
   - Connect to the 6 primary hubs: Consciousness, Dopamine, Decision-Making, Identity, AI Agents, Flow States
   - Reference the user's existing frameworks (Folder Paradigm, Mental Models Taxonomy, etc.)
   - Identify consilience opportunities (3+ domains converging)
   - Find validation or challenges to current thinking
   - Look for applications of Buddhist/neuroscience principles

3. **Prioritize:**
   - Research findings that extend current understanding
   - Empirical data that validates intuitive frameworks
   - Novel architectures or methodologies
   - Real-world implications and case studies
   - Philosophical or meta-level insights

4. **Quality Standards:**
   - 15-25 high-quality insights per report
   - Avoid redundancy with existing knowledge base (ALWAYS search for duplicates)
   - Include proper citations (paper title, authors, year)
   - Tag appropriately for discoverability
   - Create connections to existing permanent notes

5. **Output Requirements:**
   - Create permanent notes in session folder
   - Include full citations and sources
   - Add relevant tags
   - Note connections to existing insights
   - Create changelog: CHANGELOG - Document Analysis YYYY-MM-DD.md

CRITICAL:
- ALWAYS search for duplicates before creating notes
- Store ALL extracted notes in: Brain/Document Insights/[Session-Folder]/
- Create comprehensive changelog documenting extraction process

Monitor Extraction Output

After extraction completes:

  1. Verify insights stored in correct Document Insights session folder
  2. Check changelog was created
  3. Note count of unique insights extracted
  4. Confirm deduplication was performed

Phase 4: Insight Interview (Optional)

After extraction completes, present the top findings and offer to run an insight interview before connection discovery. This captures your personal perspective alongside the external research - making the final connection map richer because it maps both what the research says AND what you actually think about it.

Present Top Insights

Summarize the 5-8 most significant extracted insights from the session folder:

  • List note titles with one-sentence descriptions
  • Highlight findings that challenge existing KB frameworks or contradict current notes
  • Flag any surprising or counterintuitive results

[APPROVAL GATE] - Run Insight Interview?

Present to user:

"[N] insights extracted on [topic]. Before connection discovery, would you like to do a quick insight interview? I'll ask you 6-8 questions grounded in your existing notes and these new findings - to capture YOUR angles, reactions, and disagreements. Your responses save to Brain/AI Extracted Notes/ and the connection finder will map both sets together.

Say yes to run the interview, or skip to go straight to connection discovery."

If yes: Invoke the insight-interview skill for the current topic.

  • The dialogue runs here - one question at a time
  • User insights saved to Brain/AI Extracted Notes/
  • Note the session timestamp so connection discovery can include these new notes

If skip: Proceed directly to Phase 5.

Update Scope for Connection Discovery

If the interview ran, Phase 5 should map connections across both:

  • External research: Brain/Document Insights/[Session-Folder]/
  • Personal insights: new notes created in Brain/AI Extracted Notes/ during this session

Phase 5: Connection Discovery

Launch Connection Finder Agent(s)

Strategy Options:

Option A: Single Comprehensive Pass

  • Run connection-finder once on the entire session folder
  • Maps all new insights against full knowledge base

Option B: Multiple Targeted Passes

  • Run connection-finder 2-3 times on different subsets
  • First pass: New insights ↔ Existing AI insights (102 notes)
  • Second pass: New insights ↔ Primary hubs (Dopamine, Consciousness, etc.)
  • Third pass: Cross-domain bridges and synthesis opportunities

Your Choice - Select based on insight count and domain diversity.

Execute Connection Discovery

Use Task tool with subagent_type='connection-finder':

Discover connections between newly extracted insights and existing knowledge base.

STARTING POINTS:
All notes in session folder: Brain/Document Insights/[Session-Folder]/

Or specify individual notes if doing targeted passes.

CONNECTION DISCOVERY GOALS:

1. **Bridge to Existing Knowledge:**
   - Connect to 102 existing AI insights
   - Link to 6 primary thematic hubs (Consciousness, Dopamine, Decision-Making, Identity, AI Agents, Flow)
   - Find relationships to original frameworks (Folder Paradigm, Mental Models Taxonomy, etc.)
   - Map to MOCs and output content

2. **Cross-Domain Opportunities:**
   - Buddhism ↔ Neuroscience ↔ AI consilience
   - Decision Science ↔ Agent Architecture
   - Flow States ↔ Peak Performance ↔ AI Optimization
   - Identity/Belief Systems ↔ Agent Fitness Functions
   - Dopamine hub connections (universal bridge)

3. **Synthesis Identification:**
   - Clusters of insights ready for article development
   - Consilience zones (3+ domains converging)
   - Emergent patterns and meta-insights
   - Framework extension opportunities
   - New MOC candidates

4. **Analysis Parameters:**
   - Similarity thresholds: 0.65-0.85 (strong to moderate)
   - Depth: 2-3 levels from each new insight
   - Focus: Non-obvious, high-value connections

5. **Output Requirements:**
   - Map direct connections to existing permanent notes
   - Identify bridge notes connecting multiple domains
   - Highlight consilience zones and synthesis opportunities
   - Create dated changelog: CHANGELOG - Connection Discovery Session YYYY-MM-DD.md
   - Store changelog in: Brain/05-Meta/Changelogs/
   - Update master changelog: Brain/CHANGELOG.md
   - Suggest concrete article topics or framework extensions

Begin comprehensive connection mapping.

Monitor Connection Discovery

After connection-finder completes:

  1. Verify changelog created in /Brain/05-Meta/Changelogs/
  2. Check master CHANGELOG.md was updated
  3. Note key findings: consilience zones, synthesis opportunities
  4. Identify high-priority article topics

Phase 6: Final Summary & Recommendations

Consolidate Results

Generate a comprehensive session report including:

# Deep Research Pipeline - Session Summary
**Date:** [Timestamp]
**Execution Mode:** [Directed / Autonomous]
**Topics Researched:** [List]

---

## Phase 1: Research
**Topics Selected:**
1. [Topic 1] - Rationale: [Why chosen]
2. [Topic 2] - Rationale: [Why chosen]
...

**Research Reports Created:**
- [Report 1]: /resources/[filename] ([N] papers analyzed)
- [Report 2]: /resources/[filename] ([N] papers analyzed)

**Total Papers Analyzed:** [N]
**Research Coverage:** [Domains covered]

---

## Phase 2: Insight Extraction
**Session Folder:** /Brain/Document Insights/[Session-Folder]/

**Extraction Results:**
- Unique insights extracted: [N]
- Duplicates avoided: [N]
- Very similar (evaluated): [N]
- Changelogs created: [List paths]

**Insights by Type:**
- Research findings: [N]
- Theoretical frameworks: [N]
- Production insights: [N]
- Contrarian arguments: [N]

**Top Insights:**
1. [[Note Title]] - [Brief description]
2. [[Note Title]] - [Brief description]
...

---

## Phase 3: Connection Discovery
**Changelogs Created:**
- [Path to connection discovery changelog]

**Key Findings:**
- Strong connections discovered: [N]
- Emergent patterns identified: [N]
- Cross-domain bridges: [N]
- Consilience zones: [List]

**Major Cross-Domain Bridges:**
1. [Domain A] ↔ [Domain B] - Mechanism: [How connected]
2. [Domain A] ↔ [Domain C] - Mechanism: [How connected]

**Synthesis Opportunities Identified:**
1. **Article:** "[Title]" - Ready for development
2. **Framework:** "[Name]" - Extension of existing work
3. **MOC Candidate:** "[Topic]" - Needs organization hub

---

## Impact Assessment

**Knowledge Base Enhancement:**
- New research domains added: [List]
- Existing frameworks validated/extended: [List]
- Gaps filled: [List]
- New connections to core hubs: [N]

**Most Significant Discoveries:**
1. [Discovery 1] - Why significant: [Explanation]
2. [Discovery 2] - Why significant: [Explanation]
3. [Discovery 3] - Why significant: [Explanation]

**Contrarian Insights:**
- [Insight that challenges conventional wisdom]
- [Insight that challenges existing framework]

---

## Recommended Next Steps

**High-Priority Actions:**
1. **Write Article:** "[Suggested title]"
   - Sources: [[Note 1]], [[Note 2]], [[Note 3]]
   - Unique angle: [What makes this distinctive]
   - Target audience: [Who would benefit]

2. **Extend Framework:** "[Framework name]"
   - Current state: [What exists]
   - Enhancement: [What research adds]
   - Application: [How to use]

3. **Create MOC:** "[Topic]"
   - Notes to organize: [Count]
   - Structure: [Suggested organization]
   - Purpose: [Navigation goal]

**Medium-Priority:**
- [Additional recommendations]

**Long-Term Opportunities:**
- [Strategic synthesis possibilities]

---

## Session Files Created

**Research Reports:**
- [Path 1]
- [Path 2]

**Insight Notes:**
- [Session folder path] ([N] notes)

**Changelogs:**
- [Extraction changelog path]
- [Connection discovery changelog path]
- Master CHANGELOG.md updated

---

## Knowledge Base Statistics (Updated)

**Before Session:**
- Total permanent notes: [N]
- AI insights: [N]
- Document insights: [N]

**After Session:**
- Total permanent notes: [N] (+[N])
- AI insights: [N]
- Document insights: [N] (+[N])

**Growth:** +[N] notes, +[N] connections

---

## Meta-Analysis

**What Worked Well:**
- [Successes in topic selection, research, extraction, or connection]

**Challenges Encountered:**
- [Any difficulties or limitations]

**Lessons for Future Sessions:**
- [Improvements for next research pipeline run]

---

**End of Deep Research Pipeline Session**

Quality Standards & Best Practices

Topic Selection (Autonomous Mode)

  • Strategic alignment: Choose topics that build on existing strengths or fill critical gaps
  • Cross-domain potential: Prefer topics that bridge multiple knowledge base hubs
  • Empirical grounding: Select areas with active research (2024-2026 papers available)
  • Practical relevance: Topics should have real-world applications or implications

Research Quality

  • Recency: Prioritize 2024-2026 papers and developments
  • Rigor: Prefer primary sources (the actual paper/lab/official doc) over summaries; reject content-farm and AI-generated regurgitation. See the canonical source diet in resources/SOURCE-AUTHORITY.md.
  • Depth: 15-25 major papers minimum per topic
  • Breadth: Cover multiple perspectives and approaches
  • Empirics: Include quantified results and performance metrics

Insight Extraction

  • Novelty: Only extract genuinely new perspectives
  • Deduplication: ALWAYS search before creating notes
  • Citations: Include full source attribution
  • Connections: Link to existing knowledge base
  • Quality > Quantity: 15-25 high-value insights, not 100 mediocre ones

Connection Discovery

  • Non-obvious focus: Surface-level links are less valuable
  • Cross-domain priority: Consilience zones are gold
  • Synthesis orientation: Identify article/framework opportunities
  • Actionable output: Provide concrete next steps

Documentation

  • Comprehensive changelogs: Document every phase
  • Clear file organization: Session folders in Document Insights
  • Master log updates: Keep CHANGELOG.md current
  • Audit trail: Future-you should understand what happened and why

Execution Protocol

  1. Parse input → Determine directed vs. autonomous mode
  2. Select topics → Either use provided topics or analyze knowledge base for gaps
  3. Get timestamp → For session folder naming
  4. Research phase → Launch research-specialist agent(s)
  5. Extraction phase → Launch document-insight-extractor for each report
  6. Insight interview → Optional gate: present top findings, offer /insight-interview to capture your angles before connection discovery
  7. Connection phase → Launch connection-finder agent(s) across both document and personal insights
  8. Generate summary → Comprehensive session report
  9. Provide recommendations → Actionable next steps for content creation

Key Principle: Fully autonomous execution. No human intervention required between phases. All insights stored in Document Insights folder structure to maintain separation from main Brain.


Error Handling

If research finds insufficient papers:

  • Broaden search criteria
  • Extend date range (include 2023)
  • Consider adjacent topics
  • Document limitation in summary

If extraction finds too many duplicates:

  • Focus on truly novel contributions
  • Look for empirical validation of concepts
  • Seek contrarian perspectives
  • Consider topic was already well-covered

If connection-finder finds weak connections:

  • Topic may be genuinely novel (good!)
  • Increase similarity threshold range
  • Run additional passes on specific hubs
  • Document gap as synthesis opportunity

If any phase fails:

  • Document error in summary
  • Continue with successful phases
  • Provide partial results
  • Recommend retry or alternative approach

Remember: This is a knowledge base expansion engine. Your goal is to systematically grow the user's second brain with cutting-edge, well-integrated insights that enhance his intellectual capabilities and content creation potential.

State Dependencies

SourceLocationReadWriteDescription
Knowledge base analysisknowledge-base-analysis.mdXCurrent KB state for gap analysis
Document InsightsBrain/Document Insights/XXSession folders for extracted insights
Research reportsresources/XXGenerated research reports
ChangelogsBrain/05-Meta/Changelogs/XXSession and discovery changelogs
Master changelogBrain/CHANGELOG.mdXXMaster change log
Local Brain Searchresources/local-brain-search/XVector search for deduplication

Completion Checklist

  • Execution mode determined (directed vs autonomous)
  • Topics selected with rationale
  • Research reports generated and saved to /resources/
  • Session folder created in Document Insights
  • Insights extracted with deduplication
  • Extraction changelog created
  • Insight interview offered (ran or skipped)
  • Connection discovery completed
  • Connection discovery changelog created in /05-Meta/Changelogs/
  • Master CHANGELOG.md updated
  • Session summary generated with recommendations
  • Synthesis opportunities identified

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.