agentleFS
AbdulSamad94AbdulSamad94/Personal-AI-Employee/.agents/skills/skill-creator-pro/SKILL.md

skill-creator-pro

Skill8 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Creates production-grade, reusable skills that extend Claude's capabilities. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill, improve an existing skill, or build domain-specific intelligence. Gathers context from codebase, conversation, and authentic sources before creating adaptable skills.

12 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use interview, doc-coauthoring and 6 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • dazuckSkill

    interview

    Interview me about a plan to flesh out requirements before implementation. Asks non-obvious questions one at a time until all ambiguities are resolved.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • JetBrainsSkill

    doc-coauthoring

    Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    internal-comms

    A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • JetBrainsSkill

    theme-factory

    Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    xlsx

    Comprehensive spreadsheet creation, editing, and analysis with support for formulas, formatting, data analysis, and visualization. When Claude needs to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv, etc) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing data, (3) Modify existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Data analysis and visualization in spreadsheets, or (5) Recalculating formulas

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    pptx

    Use this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates (.potx), layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user mentions \"deck,\" \"slides,\" \"presentation,\" or references a .pptx or .potx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward. If a .pptx or .potx file needs to be opened, created, or touched, use this skill.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +2 more from anthropics

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

18 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 13

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Create production-grade skills that extend Claude's capabilities.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Test skills in production environments

    line 40
  3. Distinctive:

    Create requirement-specific skills (always create reusable intelligence)

    line 43
  4. Distinctive:

    Before asking user anything, verify internally:

    line 68
  5. Distinctive:

    Only ask about user's SPECIFIC context:

    line 83
  6. Distinctive:

    Ask about SKILL METADATA and USER REQUIREMENTS (not domain knowledge):

    line 98
  7. Distinctive:

    Question pacing: Avoid asking too many questions in a single message.

    line 131
  8. Distinctive:

    Prefer concise examples over verbose explanations.

    line 157
  9. Very specific:

    Large files: If references >10k words, include grep search patterns in SKILL.md for efficient discovery.

    line 220
  10. Very specific:

    Decision: If procedure is complex, error-prone, or needs to be exactly repeatable → create script.

    line 233
  11. Distinctive:

    Every generated skill should include:

    line 265
  12. Distinctive:

    After determining skill type, follow type-specific patterns:

    line 287
  13. Distinctive:

    Metadata: Ask skill type + domain (Questions 1-2)

    line 309
  14. Distinctive:

    Requirements: Ask user's specific needs (Questions 3-6)

    line 311
  15. Very specific:

    Embed: Put gathered domain expertise into references/

    line 313
  16. Very specific:

    Implement: Write SKILL.md + resources following type patterns

    line 315
  17. Very specific:

    Validate: Run scripts/package_skill.py and test

    line 316
  18. Distinctive:

    Before delivering a skill, verify:

    line 336

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skill Creator Pro

Create production-grade skills that extend Claude's capabilities.

How This Skill Works

User: "Create a skill for X"
       ↓
Claude Code uses this meta-skill as guidance
       ↓
Follow Domain Discovery → Ask user clarifying questions → Create skill
       ↓
Generated skill with embedded domain expertise

This skill provides guidance and structure for creating skills. Claude Code:

  1. Uses this skill's framework to discover domain knowledge
  2. Asks user for clarifications about THEIR specific requirements
  3. Decides how to structure the generated skill based on domain needs

What This Skill Does

  • Guides creation of new skills from scratch
  • Helps improve existing skills to production quality
  • Provides patterns for 5 skill types (Builder, Guide, Automation, Analyzer, Validator)
  • Ensures skills encode procedural knowledge + domain expertise

What This Skill Does NOT Do

  • Test skills in production environments
  • Deploy or distribute skills
  • Handle skill versioning/updates after creation
  • Create requirement-specific skills (always create reusable intelligence)

Domain Discovery Framework

Key Principle: Users want domain expertise IN the skill. They may not BE domain experts.

Phase 1: Automatic Discovery (No User Input)

Proactively research the domain before asking anything:

DiscoverHowExample: "Kafka integration"
Core conceptsOfficial docs, Context7Producers, consumers, topics, partitions
Standards/complianceSearch "[domain] standards"Kafka security, exactly-once semantics
Best practicesSearch "[domain] best practices 2025"Partitioning strategies, consumer groups
Anti-patternsSearch "[domain] common mistakes"Too many partitions, no monitoring
SecuritySearch "[domain] security"SASL, SSL, ACLs, encryption
EcosystemSearch "[domain] ecosystem tools"Confluent, Schema Registry, Connect

Sources priority: Official docs → Library docs (Context7) → GitHub → Community → WebSearch

Phase 2: Knowledge Sufficiency Check

Before asking user anything, verify internally:

- [ ] Core concepts understood?
- [ ] Best practices identified?
- [ ] Anti-patterns known?
- [ ] Security considerations covered?
- [ ] Official sources found?

If ANY gap → Research more (don't ask user for domain knowledge)
Only if CANNOT discover (proprietary/internal) → Ask user

Phase 3: User Requirements (NOT Domain Knowledge)

Only ask about user's SPECIFIC context:

AskDon't Ask
"What's YOUR use case?""What is Kafka?"
"What's YOUR tech stack?""What options exist?"
"Any existing resources?""How does it work?"
"Specific constraints?""What are best practices?"

The skill contains domain expertise. User provides requirements.


Required Clarifications

Ask about SKILL METADATA and USER REQUIREMENTS (not domain knowledge):

Skill Metadata

1. Skill Type - "What type of skill?"

TypePurposeExample
BuilderCreate artifactsWidgets, code, documents
GuideProvide instructionsHow-to, tutorials
AutomationExecute workflowsFile processing, deployments
AnalyzerExtract insightsCode review, data analysis
ValidatorEnforce qualityCompliance checks, scoring

2. Domain - "What domain or technology?"

User Requirements (After Domain Discovery)

3. Use Case - "What's YOUR specific use case?"

  • Not "what can it do" but "what do YOU need"

4. Tech Stack - "What's YOUR environment?"

  • Languages, frameworks, existing infrastructure

5. Existing Resources - "Any scripts, templates, configs to include?"

6. Constraints - "Any specific requirements or limitations?"

  • Performance, security, compliance specific to user's context

Note

  • Questions 1-2: Ask immediately
  • Domain Discovery: Research automatically after knowing domain
  • Questions 3-6: Ask after discovery, informed by domain knowledge
  • Question pacing: Avoid asking too many questions in a single message. Start with most important, follow up as needed.

Core Principles

Reusable Intelligence, Not Requirement-Specific

Skills must handle VARIATIONS, not single requirements:

❌ Bad: "Create bar chart with sales data using Recharts"
✅ Good: "Create visualizations - adaptable to data shape, chart type, library"

❌ Bad: "Deploy to AWS EKS with Helm"
✅ Good: "Deploy applications - adaptable to platform, orchestration, environment"

Identify what VARIES vs what's CONSTANT in the domain. See references/reusability-patterns.md.

Concise is Key

Context window is a public good (~1,500+ tokens per skill activation). Challenge each piece:

  • "Does Claude really need this explanation?"
  • "Does this paragraph justify its token cost?"

Prefer concise examples over verbose explanations.

Appropriate Freedom

Match specificity to task fragility:

Freedom LevelWhen to UseExample
HighMultiple approaches valid"Choose your preferred style"
MediumPreferred pattern existsPseudocode with parameters
LowOperations are fragileExact scripts, few parameters

Progressive Disclosure

Three-level loading system:

  1. Metadata (~100 tokens) - Always in context (description ≤1024 chars)
  2. SKILL.md body (<500 lines) - When skill triggers
  3. References (unlimited) - Loaded as needed by Claude

Anatomy of a Skill

Generated skills are zero-shot domain experts with embedded knowledge.

skill-name/
├── SKILL.md (required)
│   ├── YAML frontmatter (name, description, allowed-tools?, model?)
│   └── Procedural knowledge (workflows, steps, decision trees)
└── Bundled Resources
    ├── references/   - Domain expertise (structure based on domain needs)
    ├── scripts/      - Executable code (tested, reliable)
    └── assets/       - Templates, boilerplate, images

SKILL.md Requirements

ComponentRequirement
Line count<500 lines (extract to references/)
FrontmatterSee references/skill-patterns.md for complete spec
nameLowercase, numbers, hyphens; ≤64 chars; match directory
description[What] + [When]; ≤1024 chars; third-person style
Description style"This skill should be used when..." (not "Use when...")
FormImperative ("Do X" not "You should X")
ScopeWhat it does AND does not do

What Goes in references/

Embed domain knowledge gathered during discovery:

Gathered KnowledgePurpose in Skill
Library/API documentationEnable correct implementation
Best practicesGuide quality decisions
Code examplesProvide reference patterns
Anti-patternsPrevent common mistakes
Domain-specific detailsSupport edge cases

Structure references/ based on what the domain needs.

Large files: If references >10k words, include grep search patterns in SKILL.md for efficient discovery.

When to Generate scripts/

Generate scripts when domain requires deterministic, executable procedures:

Domain NeedExample Scripts
Setup/installationInstall dependencies, initialize project
ProcessingTransform data, process files
ValidationCheck compliance, verify output
DeploymentDeploy services, configure infrastructure

Decision: If procedure is complex, error-prone, or needs to be exactly repeatable → create script. Otherwise → document in SKILL.md or references/.

When to Generate assets/

Generate assets when domain requires exact templates or boilerplate:

Domain NeedExample Assets
Starting templatesHTML boilerplate, component scaffolds
Configuration filesConfig templates, schema definitions
Code boilerplateBase classes, starter code

What NOT to Include

  • README.md (SKILL.md IS the readme)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • LICENSE (inherited from repo)
  • Duplicate information

What Generated Skill Does at Runtime

User invokes skill → Gather context from:
  1. Codebase (if existing project)
  2. Conversation (user's requirements)
  3. Own references/ (embedded domain expertise)
  4. User-specific guidelines
→ Ensure all information gathered → Implement ZERO-SHOT

Include in Generated Skills

Every generated skill should include:

## Before Implementation

Gather context to ensure successful implementation:

| Source | Gather |
|--------|--------|
| **Codebase** | Existing structure, patterns, conventions to integrate with |
| **Conversation** | User's specific requirements, constraints, preferences |
| **Skill References** | Domain patterns from `references/` (library docs, best practices, examples) |
| **User Guidelines** | Project-specific conventions, team standards |

Ensure all required context is gathered before implementing.
Only ask user for THEIR specific requirements (domain expertise is in this skill).

Type-Aware Creation

After determining skill type, follow type-specific patterns:

TypeKey SectionsReference
BuilderClarifications → Output Spec → Standards → Checklistskill-patterns.md#builder
GuideWorkflow → Examples → Official Docsskill-patterns.md#guide
AutomationScripts → Dependencies → Error Handlingskill-patterns.md#automation
AnalyzerScope → Criteria → Output Formatskill-patterns.md#analyzer
ValidatorCriteria → Scoring → Thresholds → Remediationskill-patterns.md#validator

Skill Creation Process

Metadata → Discovery → Requirements → Analyze → Embed → Structure → Implement → Validate

See references/creation-workflow.md for detailed steps.

Quick Steps

  1. Metadata: Ask skill type + domain (Questions 1-2)
  2. Discovery: Research domain automatically (Phase 1-2 above)
  3. Requirements: Ask user's specific needs (Questions 3-6)
  4. Analyze: Identify procedural (HOW) + domain (WHAT) knowledge
  5. Embed: Put gathered domain expertise into references/
  6. Structure: Initialize skill directory
  7. Implement: Write SKILL.md + resources following type patterns
  8. Validate: Run scripts/package_skill.py and test

SKILL.md Template

---
name: skill-name                    # lowercase, hyphens, ≤64 chars
description: |                      # ≤1024 chars
  [What] Capability statement.
  [When] Use when users ask to <triggers>.
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob     # optional: restrict tools
---

See references/skill-patterns.md for complete frontmatter spec and body patterns.


Output Checklist

Before delivering a skill, verify:

Domain Discovery Complete

  • Core concepts discovered and understood
  • Best practices identified from authentic sources
  • Anti-patterns documented
  • Security considerations covered
  • Official documentation linked
  • User was NOT asked for domain knowledge

Frontmatter

  • name: lowercase, hyphens, ≤64 chars, matches directory
  • description: [What]+[When], ≤1024 chars, clear triggers
  • allowed-tools: Set if restricted access needed

Structure

  • SKILL.md <500 lines
  • Progressive disclosure (details in references/)

Knowledge Coverage

  • Procedural (HOW): Workflows, decision trees, error handling
  • Domain (WHAT): Concepts, best practices, anti-patterns

Zero-Shot Implementation (in generated skill)

  • Includes "Before Implementation" section
  • Gathers runtime context (codebase, conversation, user guidelines)
  • Domain expertise embedded in references/ (structured per domain needs)
  • Only asks user for THEIR requirements (not domain knowledge)

Reusability

  • Handles variations (not requirement-specific)
  • Clarifications capture variable elements (user's context)
  • Constants encoded (domain patterns, best practices)

Type-Specific (see references/skill-patterns.md)

  • Builder: Clarifications, output spec, standards, checklist
  • Guide: Workflow, examples, official docs
  • Automation: Scripts, dependencies, error handling
  • Analyzer: Scope, criteria, output format
  • Validator: Criteria, scoring, thresholds, remediation

Reference Files

FileWhen to Read
references/creation-workflow.mdDetailed step-by-step creation process
references/skill-patterns.mdFrontmatter spec, type-specific patterns, assets guidance
references/reusability-patterns.mdProcedural+domain knowledge, varies vs constant
references/quality-patterns.mdClarifications, enforcement, checklists
references/technical-patterns.mdError handling, security, dependencies
references/workflows.mdSequential and conditional workflow patterns
references/output-patterns.mdTemplate and example patterns

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.