ticket
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Capture a brain-dump as a well-formed work item - verb-first title, acceptance criteria, file paths when known, an out-of-scope line. Files a GitHub issue in tickets mode or appends a numbered PLAN.md task in document mode; unknowns are marked TBD, never invented. Use when the user brain-dumps an idea, bug, or task to capture for later, or asks to ticket, file, or note something as work.
23 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- infenia/yuktatheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- peterpme/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Mrbaeksang/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kyle-chalmers/ticketwrighttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- 0xfurai/peekapingtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- codingpains/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use orchestrate, spec and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
varun29ankuSSkillorchestrate
This skill should be used when the user asks to 'orchestrate a task', 'break down work into parallel agents', 'coordinate subtasks', 'run agents in parallel', or mentions 'multi-agent'. Decomposes complex tasks into tracked subtasks, dispatches parallel subagents, and coordinates until completion.
Also in 4 projects that use this
SentrySkillspec
Produce a verified spec — problem, desired outcome, and acceptance criteria — before building. Use when given a GitHub/Linear issue link, when starting from a fuzzy in-conversation idea, or asked to "figure out what to do" / "scope this" / "what should I build" — whenever the *what* isn't yet pinned down. Grills the ambiguities, checks the premise against the code, and produces acceptance criteria you sign off on — then hands to design-first.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 5 projects that use this
GoogleSkillprototype
Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkilltdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions23 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 23
- 0xfurai/peekaping★ 1.2ksame name
- kjnez/claude-code-django★ 177same name
- peterpme/skills★ 28same name
- ConnorGriffin/skills★ 21same name
- kyle-chalmers/ticketwright★ 4same name
- a-saven/agent-skills★ 2same name
- gingerminds/claude-skills★ 2same name
- codingpains/skills★ 1same name
- HoussemDjeghri/self-review★ 1same name
- ilamanov/skills★ 1same name
13 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- auditSkill
- challengeSkill
- contract-checkSkill
- depsSkill
- design-auditSkill
- designSkill
- doSkill
- eval-runSkill
- eval-specSkill
- healthSkill
- investigateSkill
- journalSkill
- learnSkill
- migrate-checkSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- planSkill
- qaSkill
- refactorSkill
- resumeSkill
- retroSkill
- secureSkill
- shipSkill
- triageSkill
- verifySkill
- whySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 20 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Run before the skill's steps — per invocation, not per session (4.36).
- Very specific: line 35
Never delete a decision. Supersede it: ~~old~~ → Verdict (YYYY-MM-DD): new call — reason.
- Distinctive: line 36
Never fix, tune, or delete a test or eval case to raise a score.
- Distinctive: line 54
Every filed item has:
- Distinctive: line 61
NOT cover; the line that prevents scope osmosis later.
- Very specific: line 100
No obvious phase → a dated checkbox under ## Open items instead.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 20 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/ticket — capture without friction, file without slop
The frictionless entry point that keeps ideas from routing around the system. A thought arrives half-formed; it leaves as a work item the next session can pick up cold — or it honestly wears a TBD.
Adjacent skills: /do (does the work; /ticket only captures it) ·
/triage (grooms the many existing items; /ticket files one new one).
<!-- acstack:runtime -->Run before the skill's steps — per invocation, not per session (4.36); failures degrade to markdown:
link="$(readlink "$HOME/.claude/skills/health" 2>/dev/null || true)" # empty = not symlinked
pack="$(dirname "$(dirname "$link")")" # NEVER trust this unless $link was non-empty
if [ "${link#/}" != "$link" ] && [ -x "$pack/bin/acstack-config" ] && ! "$pack/bin/acstack-config" runtime | grep -q '=off'; then
"$pack/bin/acstack-config" || true # resolved keys, with sources
"$pack/bin/acstack-update-check" || true # ≤1 fetch/day; silent ONLY if already checked today
"$pack/bin/acstack-recall" || true # LEARNINGS.md + bug-class names, capped 3KB
else
echo "runtime off — proceeding without recall/update-check"
fi<!-- /acstack:runtime --><!-- acstack:principles -->Operating principles
- Be direct. Push back in writing when the plan or the user is wrong. No sycophancy.
- Never delete a decision. Supersede it:
~~old~~ → **Verdict (YYYY-MM-DD):** new call — reason. - Never fix, tune, or delete a test or eval case to raise a score. Log the miss honestly and leave the case unchanged.
- Name exact things: regex patterns, function signatures, model names, before → after numbers. Never "fixed bugs".
- Attribution: follow the project's
attributionsetting (defaultnone) — no AI-tool mentions in generated docs, no attribution trailers in commits or PRs. Commit with explicit-m/-Fmessages only. - Config: read
.claude/acstack.mdat the project root (fall back to~/.claude/acstack.md) before acting.## Settingskeys override pack defaults; a## <skill-name>section overrides both. Unknown keys and sections are ignored. - Docs: BRIEF.md (frozen seed) / PLAN.md (living plan) / JOURNAL.md (rolling journal). If the repo uses legacy names (PLANNING_PROMPT.md / PLANNING.md / STATUS.md), use those instead — never create both.
- Recall: if
LEARNINGS.mdexists at the project root, read it before starting. - Conduct: follow the
acstack-conductblock in this repo's AGENTS.md — the word is the mode; the user sets the pace. - Hackathon lane: if the project's AGENTS.md carries the
acstack:hackathon-laneblock, only/dochanges the repository during the event. Any other skill that would write a tracked file, commit or push says what it would have done and stops; a change that is not a task goes through the lane's operator route.
<!-- /acstack:principles -->One document set. Resolve exactly ONE BRIEF/PLAN/JOURNAL set and name
its path in the report's scope line. If more than one candidate set exists
— a monorepo, nested products, an apps/* tree each with its own docs —
list the candidates and STOP. Never pick one silently: a confident answer
about the wrong product is worse than no answer (conduct rule 8).
The bar
Every filed item has:
- Verb-first title —
fix scheme-name matching for hyphenated funds, notscheme names. - Acceptance criteria — runnable where possible; observable always.
- File paths — when known or cheaply inferable from the dump.
- Out-of-scope line — the adjacent thing this item deliberately does NOT cover; the line that prevents scope osmosis later.
What the dump doesn't say and the repo can't cheaply tell you is marked
explicitly — Acceptance: TBD — needs <what> — never invented. A wrong
guessed acceptance is worse than an honest TBD: it fails silently at /do
time.
At most ONE round of clarifying questions, and only when the item would otherwise be unfileable (no discernible action at all). Friction is the enemy here: a captured-but-imperfect item beats a perfect item the user gave up on filing.
Tickets mode (tracking: tickets)
Preconditions — gh installed, gh auth status succeeding, and a
GitHub remote present. Any failure names WHICH one failed and offers
document mode; never guess. Then gh issue create:
- Body follows
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/task.md(acceptance / files / out-of-scope sections). - Best-fit label from the standard set (
bug/feature/chore); items with TBD acceptance also getneeds-acceptance. - Milestone: the current one, unless the dump clearly targets another — ask only when genuinely ambiguous, and never more than once.
Document mode
Append a numbered task to PLAN.md:
- Under the current open phase, taking the next free task number — existing tasks are NEVER renumbered. One carve-out: a number allocated on a branch is provisional until the branch merges. Two sessions reading the same plan draw the same number, and when the filings land at different offsets git merges them with no conflict (measured 2026-09-16, 5.17.1). So place the new task at the physical end of the phase's list, where a concurrent filing collides visibly instead of merging silently — and when two filings do collide, keep both and renumber the later-merged one; never drop either.
- With its acceptance line (or the explicit TBD).
- No obvious phase → a dated checkbox under
## Open itemsinstead; /triage or the next/plan replanfinds it a home. - No PLAN.md at all → do NOT create one. A plan scaffolded as a side
effect of filing a ticket is a plan nobody designed. Say the item cannot
be filed in document mode, print the well-formed task text so nothing is
lost, and name
/plan seedas what creates the document.
Report and stop
Report what was filed — the issue URL or the exact PLAN.md line, and in document mode that the number is provisional until the branch merges — and stop. Capture never starts the work (CONDUCT rule 5): /ticket writing code because the fix "looked quick" is exactly the failure mode this skill exists to prevent.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

