audit
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Audit one of six targets. code - defect hunt producing a report with safety checks and adversarial verification evidence; docs - drift check of README/PLAN/JOURNAL against the actual tree, counts, and checkbox reality; eval - failure classification with the never-inflate rule; tests - finds tests that pass without catching, including a mutation spot-check; skills - SKILL.md hygiene; readme - whether the front door works on a stranger, measured against comparator projects. Use when the user asks to audit or review code, a PR, project docs, an eval report, a test suite, or a skill.
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Laucked-Security/claude-oswetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sanmidable/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alegauss/claude-traytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ansvisor/ansvisortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MammadovEshgin/clean-code-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use delight, teach-impeccable and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
HK-hubSkilldelight
Add moments of joy, personality, and unexpected touches that make interfaces memorable and enjoyable to use. Elevates functional to delightful. Use when the user asks to add polish, personality, animations, micro-interactions, delight, or make an interface feel fun or memorable.
Also in 32 projects that use this
HK-hubSkillteach-impeccable
One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.
Also in 19 projects that use this
zwy123zwySkillnormalize
将用户随意输入的提示词规范化为结构清晰、便于大模型执行的标准化提示词。适用于需要整理、统一提示词格式时调用。
Also in 19 projects that use this
SkillPilotCHSkilllevel-up
Eine Automatisierung pro Woche finden, scopen, shippen. Output landet als proposed-Eintrag in cadence.md mit konkreten Implementations-Schritten.
Also in 12 projects that use this
ww-w-aiSkillpm-discovery
PM Agent Team - Automated product discovery, strategy, and PRD generation. Runs PM analysis workflow to produce comprehensive PRD before PDCA Plan phase.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from HK-hub
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- ccch1mneyyy/dsh-TUI★ 7.2ksame name
- macro-inc/macro★ 6ksame name
- yournextstore/yournextstore★ 5.5ksame name
- gadievron/raptor★ 4ksame name
- alchemy-run/alchemy★ 1.9ksame name
- alchemy-run/alchemy-effect★ 1.9ksame name
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodal★ 1.5ksame name
- jsmastery-pro/skills★ 1.4ksame name
- nateherkai/AIS-OS★ 1.4ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- challengeSkill
- contract-checkSkill
- depsSkill
- design-auditSkill
- designSkill
- doSkill
- eval-runSkill
- eval-specSkill
- healthSkill
- investigateSkill
- journalSkill
- learnSkill
- migrate-checkSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- planSkill
- qaSkill
- refactorSkill
- resumeSkill
- retroSkill
- secureSkill
- shipSkill
- ticketSkill
- triageSkill
- verifySkill
- whySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 175 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Run before the skill's steps — per invocation, not per session (4.36).
- Very specific: line 36
Never delete a decision. Supersede it: ~~old~~ → Verdict (YYYY-MM-DD): new call — reason.
- Distinctive: line 37
Never fix, tune, or delete a test or eval case to raise a score.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 175 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/audit — find what's wrong and report it honestly
Six targets, one stance: verdicts backed by evidence, misses logged rather than massaged, and scope stated so the reader knows what was NOT checked.
Adjacent skills: /secure (security-only findings with exploit scenarios) ·
/qa (probes the running system; /audit reads code and docs) · /investigate
(root-causes one failure; /audit sweeps for many).
<!-- acstack:runtime -->Run before the skill's steps — per invocation, not per session (4.36); failures degrade to markdown:
link="$(readlink "$HOME/.claude/skills/health" 2>/dev/null || true)" # empty = not symlinked
pack="$(dirname "$(dirname "$link")")" # NEVER trust this unless $link was non-empty
if [ "${link#/}" != "$link" ] && [ -x "$pack/bin/acstack-config" ] && ! "$pack/bin/acstack-config" runtime | grep -q '=off'; then
"$pack/bin/acstack-config" || true # resolved keys, with sources
"$pack/bin/acstack-update-check" || true # ≤1 fetch/day; silent ONLY if already checked today
"$pack/bin/acstack-recall" || true # LEARNINGS.md + bug-class names, capped 3KB
else
echo "runtime off — proceeding without recall/update-check"
fi<!-- /acstack:runtime --><!-- acstack:principles -->Operating principles
- Be direct. Push back in writing when the plan or the user is wrong. No sycophancy.
- Never delete a decision. Supersede it:
~~old~~ → **Verdict (YYYY-MM-DD):** new call — reason. - Never fix, tune, or delete a test or eval case to raise a score. Log the miss honestly and leave the case unchanged.
- Name exact things: regex patterns, function signatures, model names, before → after numbers. Never "fixed bugs".
- Attribution: follow the project's
attributionsetting (defaultnone) — no AI-tool mentions in generated docs, no attribution trailers in commits or PRs. Commit with explicit-m/-Fmessages only. - Config: read
.claude/acstack.mdat the project root (fall back to~/.claude/acstack.md) before acting.## Settingskeys override pack defaults; a## <skill-name>section overrides both. Unknown keys and sections are ignored. - Docs: BRIEF.md (frozen seed) / PLAN.md (living plan) / JOURNAL.md (rolling journal). If the repo uses legacy names (PLANNING_PROMPT.md / PLANNING.md / STATUS.md), use those instead — never create both.
- Recall: if
LEARNINGS.mdexists at the project root, read it before starting. - Conduct: follow the
acstack-conductblock in this repo's AGENTS.md — the word is the mode; the user sets the pace. - Hackathon lane: if the project's AGENTS.md carries the
acstack:hackathon-laneblock, only/dochanges the repository during the event. Any other skill that would write a tracked file, commit or push says what it would have done and stops; a change that is not a task goes through the lane's operator route.
<!-- /acstack:principles -->One document set. Resolve exactly ONE BRIEF/PLAN/JOURNAL set and name
its path in the report's scope line. If more than one candidate set exists
— a monorepo, nested products, an apps/* tree each with its own docs —
list the candidates and STOP. Never pick one silently: a confident answer
about the wrong product is worse than no answer (conduct rule 8).
Every line number is pasted, never counted — all six targets. A
file:line in any report comes from line-numbered tool output
(grep -n), not from counting or recall: a wrong line number turns a
real finding into one the author can dismiss.
Before any target — does this need the pass at all?
First: does this target need the pass at all? A diff that only moves files, bumps a version, or changes generated output has nothing to audit — say so in one line and stop. A review that manufactures findings because it was invoked is worse than no review: it spends the reader's attention on noise and trains them to skim the next one.
That gate is not code-specific; it was written "this target" and merely sat
under code until 4.61 moved it here. Each target's reference adds its own
stop condition (no results file, no test suite) on top of it.
Target: code
Full procedure: references/target-code.md — read it when the
invocation names code, and not otherwise. It carries the known-bug-class
sweep, the report shape, and the reports-never-fixes rule. (The
does-this-need-auditing gate moved OUT of it in 4.61 and is above.)
Target: docs
Full procedure: references/target-docs.md — read it when the
invocation names docs, and not otherwise. It carries the drift classes,
the owed-work rule, and the doc-says/reality-is output shape.
Target: eval
Full procedure: references/target-eval.md — read it when the
invocation names eval, and not otherwise. It carries the no-results-file
stop, the failure buckets, and the never-inflate rule.
Target: tests
Full procedure: references/target-tests.md — read it when the
invocation names tests, and not otherwise. It carries the five
no-teeth classes, the mutation spot-check, and the revert discipline.
Target: readme
Full procedure: references/target-readme.md — read it when the
invocation names readme, and not otherwise. It asks whether the front
door works on a stranger, which docs does not: who the project is for,
whether install is reachable, roster completeness, density and prose
texture against measured comparators, and capability claims that have gone
stale. It reports and never rewrites — a README carries the project's
voice.
Target: skills
Full procedure: references/target-skills.md — read it when the
invocation names skills, and not otherwise. It carries the seven
classes: YAML-truncating frontmatter, name/dir match, description
trigger surface, body budget, citation resolution, allowed-tools
honesty, and conditional-branch waste.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

