agentleFS
ARCASSystemsARCASSystems/FounderOS/skills/blind-spot-review/SKILL.md

blind-spot-review

Skill7 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub

Pressure-test a draft for blind spots before pre-send review. Say "find blind spots", "what am I missing", or "review for risk". Runs nine fixed review categories covering evidence, risk, timing, relationships, data, upside, and walkaway planning. Read-only.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈11

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If any input is missing, stop and name the gap.

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    Check ownership, licenses, registrations, names, contracts, claims, and any rights the deliverable assumes.

    line 38
  3. Distinctive:

    Check pending proposals, signed contracts, vendor terms, partner terms, employment or contractor terms, and anything that changes if the …

    line 42
  4. Distinctive:

    Check unpaid invoices, loans, deposits, deferred pay, refund exposure, or anyone who must be paid before value is split.

    line 46
  5. Distinctive:

    Check audiences, email lists, CRM records, customer data, content libraries, social accounts, group chats, and consent boundaries.

    line 50
  6. Distinctive:

    Check co-founders, team members, family, friends, partners, investors, and anyone whose position changes because of the recommendation.

    line 54
  7. Distinctive:

    Check renewal dates, tax dates, filing deadlines, permit windows, launch dates, meeting dates, campaign timing, or any dated constraint.

    line 58
  8. Distinctive:

    Check whether the other party has been prepared, whether a written pre-brief is needed, and what silence before the meeting may signal.

    line 62
  9. Distinctive:

    Check what happens if the other party responds well, offers more than expected, or helps design the solution.

    line 66
  10. Distinctive:

    Check what the founder or client does if the meeting fails, the deal stalls, or the recommendation is rejected.

    line 70
  11. Very specific:

    If any category is marked GAP, the verdict is FIX THEN RE-REVIEW unless the founder explicitly accepts the risk.

    line 101
  12. Distinctive:

    No em dashes, no en dashes, no banned words.

    line 103

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Blind-Spot Review

Runs on: reasoning - reads your files and reasons; any capable agent can run this.

The first draft of an advisory deliverable is rarely the safe final draft. This skill runs a second pass against nine fixed categories so the founder can decide what to add, what to accept, and what to leave out.

When To Run

  • A proposal, brief, playbook, meeting-prep note, client update, or decision document has a complete first draft.
  • The founder asks what is missing.
  • A deliverable is about to run through pre-send-check.
  • The stakes include external trust, legal exposure, financial terms, client expectations, or relationship damage.

Inputs Required

  • Path to the deliverable.
  • Source material used to create it: transcript, notes, client context, prior decision, or brief.
  • The external party or audience.
  • Intended send channel and date, if known.

If any input is missing, stop and name the gap. Do not review a deliverable without source context.

The Nine Categories

For each category, mark ADDRESSED, GAP, or NOT APPLICABLE with a one-line reason.

1. Legal and IP Status

Check ownership, licenses, registrations, names, contracts, claims, and any rights the deliverable assumes.

2. Contracts In Flight

Check pending proposals, signed contracts, vendor terms, partner terms, employment or contractor terms, and anything that changes if the advice is followed.

3. Creditor and Payment Positions

Check unpaid invoices, loans, deposits, deferred pay, refund exposure, or anyone who must be paid before value is split.

4. Community and Data Assets

Check audiences, email lists, CRM records, customer data, content libraries, social accounts, group chats, and consent boundaries.

5. Relationship Externalities

Check co-founders, team members, family, friends, partners, investors, and anyone whose position changes because of the recommendation.

6. Regulatory and Timing Issues

Check renewal dates, tax dates, filing deadlines, permit windows, launch dates, meeting dates, campaign timing, or any dated constraint.

7. Pre-Meeting Communication

Check whether the other party has been prepared, whether a written pre-brief is needed, and what silence before the meeting may signal.

8. Upside Scenarios

Check what happens if the other party responds well, offers more than expected, or helps design the solution. Good outcomes need a plan too.

9. Walkaway Plan

Check what the founder or client does if the meeting fails, the deal stalls, or the recommendation is rejected.

Output Format

# Blind-spot review on `<deliverable-name>` - <YYYY-MM-DD>

## Categories addressed

1. Legal and IP status: ADDRESSED / GAP / NOT APPLICABLE - <one-line specifics>
2. Contracts in flight: ADDRESSED / GAP / NOT APPLICABLE - <one-line specifics>
3. Creditor and payment positions: ADDRESSED / GAP / NOT APPLICABLE - <one-line specifics>
4. Community and data assets: ADDRESSED / GAP / NOT APPLICABLE - <one-line specifics>
5. Relationship externalities: ADDRESSED / GAP / NOT APPLICABLE - <one-line specifics>
6. Regulatory and timing issues: ADDRESSED / GAP / NOT APPLICABLE - <one-line specifics>
7. Pre-meeting communication: ADDRESSED / GAP / NOT APPLICABLE - <one-line specifics>
8. Upside scenarios: ADDRESSED / GAP / NOT APPLICABLE - <one-line specifics>
9. Walkaway plan: ADDRESSED / GAP / NOT APPLICABLE - <one-line specifics>

## Additions to fold back into the deliverable

- <specific change, with section or file location>

## Verdict

READY FOR pre-send-check | FIX THEN RE-REVIEW

Rules

  • Review only. Do not edit the deliverable in this skill.
  • If any category is marked GAP, the verdict is FIX THEN RE-REVIEW unless the founder explicitly accepts the risk.
  • Name the highest-risk gap first if the user is under time pressure.
  • No em dashes, no en dashes, no banned words.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.