execution-controller
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a bounded software objective should advance end to end through planning, Skill selection, implementation, evidence tracking, and final verification.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- development-plannerSkill
- skill-routerSkill
- task-control-towerSkill
- task-handoffSkill
- verification-gateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Read the objective, repository state, existing evidence, frozen behavior, and system and user boundaries.
- Very specific: line 16
Use development-planner, or apply its task contract as a conservative fallback, to create or validate the smallest sufficient graph.
- Very specific: line 18
Use skill-router, or its route contract, for each dependency-ready task.
- Distinctive: line 22
After each meaningful action, update the evidence ledger.
- Very specific: line 23
Run verification-gate before reporting completion.
- Very specific: line 33
When durable machine-readable state is useful, use codex-control-tower as an optional local evidence ledger.
- Distinctive: line 44
After two equivalent failures, stop that path.
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not restart the whole objective to hide a local failure.
- Very specific: line 51
Do not mark a task complete from activity metadata or intention.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Execution Controller
This is the plugin's end-to-end entry point. It advances one approved objective through the existing Codex session; it is not a background service and does not continue after the runtime stops.
Control Loop
- Read the objective, repository state, existing evidence, frozen behavior, and system and user boundaries.
- Use
development-planner, or apply its task contract as a conservative fallback, to create or validate the smallest sufficient graph. - Use
skill-router, or its route contract, for each dependency-ready task. - Execute only dependency-ready work. Keep the critical path in the current task unless another execution mechanism is both available and appropriate.
- Parallelize only when the runtime permits it and write scopes do not overlap.
- After each meaningful action, update the evidence ledger.
- Run
verification-gatebefore reporting completion.
Evidence Ledger
For each task record its state, latest evidence, evidence time, write scope, attempt count, blocker, and next safe action. Evidence means an inspectable diff, command result, test, runtime log, commit, or external receipt.
Optional Local Evidence Ledger
When durable machine-readable state is useful, use codex-control-tower as an
optional local evidence ledger. It can initialize a bounded task graph, record
evidence and equivalent-failure keys, show dependency-ready work, enforce the
two-failure stop, evaluate the verification gate, and create a sanitized
handoff. The CLI does not replace judgment, execute project commands by itself,
or grant authority for an operation. The active Codex session remains
responsible for choosing and performing approved work.
Failure Control
- Classify failures by root cause, not wording alone.
- After two equivalent failures, stop that path. Make no third blind attempt.
- Preserve files, diffs, logs, and the last known state at a safe checkpoint.
- Do not restart the whole objective to hide a local failure.
- Continue unrelated dependency-ready work only when its scope remains safe.
Completion And Pause
Do not mark a task complete from activity metadata or intention. If verification
is unavailable, report unverified. If execution pauses, use task-handoff for
a sanitized continuation record. Use task-control-tower only when multiple
tasks need an evidence-backed board.
Planning and Skill routing never override system and user boundaries, install missing capabilities, or authorize credentials, production data, publishing, deployment, or destructive operations.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

