development-planner
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a software objective needs a bounded dependency plan before implementation, especially when scope, verification, or safe parallelism is unclear.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Mazalucas/El-DT-Lightweight-Armytheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Mazalucas/El-DT-Lightweight-Army★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- execution-controllerSkill
- skill-routerSkill
- task-control-towerSkill
- task-handoffSkill
- verification-gateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Read the objective, repository state, existing evidence, constraints, and frozen behavior.
- Distinctive: line 19
Every task has exactly these fields:
- Distinctive: line 30
Keep a straightforward change as one task.
- Distinctive: line 38
Keep deployment, publishing, production data, credentials, and destructive operations behind their existing approval boundaries.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Development Planner
Turn one concrete software objective into the smallest sufficient dependency graph. A plan exists to make execution safer and faster, not to manufacture extra tasks.
Input Gate
Read the objective, repository state, existing evidence, constraints, and frozen
behavior. Record every unknown as unverified; do not silently guess it.
Task Contract
Every task has exactly these fields:
- Outcome: observable result, not an activity.
- Dependencies: task identifiers or
none. - Write scope: files or modules the task may change.
- Success criteria: behavior that must be true.
- Verification: command, test, inspection, or receipt that proves success.
- Stop condition: failure, boundary, or missing input that pauses the task.
Split Rules
- Keep a straightforward change as one task. Do not split reading, one coherent edit, and its focused verification into ceremonial subtasks.
- Split only for a real dependency, a distinct write scope, an independent deliverable, or a separate risk boundary.
- Mark a task
dependency-readyonly when every dependency has inspectable completion evidence. - Parallel candidates must have no dependency relationship and disjoint write scopes. Planning does not itself authorize parallel execution.
- Keep deployment, publishing, production data, credentials, and destructive operations behind their existing approval boundaries.
Output
Return the objective and a compact task table using the task contract. Name the critical path, parallel candidates, frozen boundaries, and the first dependency-ready task. If one task is sufficient, say so explicitly.
Reject plans that duplicate work, reopen verified behavior without cause, or replace a missing fact with an assumption.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

