agentleFS
0xelitesystem0xelitesystem/claude-skills-templates/skills/one-pager/SKILL.md

one-pager

Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Turn raw notes, transcripts, or longform content into a tight one-page executive brief. Use whenever the user wants a one-pager, exec brief, briefing doc, or asks to compress longer content into a structured one-page summary. Triggers on phrases like "write a one-pager", "make this a brief", "summarize for an exec", "turn these notes into a brief", or when the user uploads notes or meeting transcripts and wants a tight structured summary. Always use this skill rather than free-form summarizing when the user asks for a "brief" or "one-pager", even if they do not say "use the one-pager skill".

12 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Always use these five sections in this order.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    No em-dashes. Use commas, semicolons, or split into two sentences.

    line 36
  3. Distinctive:

    No filler openings. Skip "In today's...", "It is worth noting that...", "When it comes to...".

    line 37
  4. Distinctive:

    No banned vocabulary: delve, leverage as a verb, seamless, robust for non-statistical claims, navigate the landscape, paradigm shift, …

    line 38
  5. Very specific:

    If the source content is too thin to fill all five sections honestly, do not invent content.

    line 45

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

One-Pager Writer

Converts raw input (notes, transcripts, source articles, research dumps) into a structured one-page brief.

Output structure

Always use these five sections in this order.

TL;DR

One sentence. The headline finding or recommendation. If the reader stops here, they should know what changed.

Context

Two to four sentences. What prompted this? What is the reader supposed to know to make sense of the rest?

Findings

Three to five bullets. Each is a specific, sourced claim. If a claim has a number, include the number. If it has a source, attribute it.

Recommendation

One paragraph. What should the reader do, decide, or believe? If there is a decision to make, state it. If the recommendation is conditional, state the condition.

Next Steps

Three to five concrete actions, each with an owner placeholder if known. Each action should be doable in a week or less.

Style rules

  • No em-dashes. Use commas, semicolons, or split into two sentences.
  • No filler openings. Skip "In today's...", "It is worth noting that...", "When it comes to...".
  • No banned vocabulary: delve, leverage as a verb, seamless, robust for non-statistical claims, navigate the landscape, paradigm shift, journey as a metaphor, unlock the power, harness the power, foster as a verb.
  • Concrete over abstract. "Revenue rose 18% in Q3" beats "significant revenue growth was observed".
  • Active voice. Name the actor.
  • Length cap: roughly 350 words total. If you exceed it, cut bullets, not sections.

When you do not have enough input

If the source content is too thin to fill all five sections honestly, do not invent content. Mark the thin section with [needs input: <what is missing>] and ask the user one specific question per gap.

Output format

Render as plain markdown. Section headings as ###. No tables unless the user asks for one. No code blocks unless the source contains code worth quoting.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.