one-pager
Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user says "one pager", "something they can forward", "my sponsor needs to send this up", "summary for their boss", "leave-behind", "brief for their leadership". Writes the single page a sponsor forwards without editing, conclusion in the first three lines, plus the line the forwarder types above it. Not for a budget case for more scope (use expansion-case), the review meeting itself (use business-review) or a list broadcast (use customer-update).
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Sach1ng/PM-operating-OStheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- plannotator/effective-htmltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- backnotprop/brotheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- JScottCarter/Claude_skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- youdcode/open-companytheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
- montgomery-pixel/leadgen-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 12
- plannotator/effective-html★ 3.8ksame name
- backnotprop/bro★ 176same name
- GTMify/aigtm★ 25same name
- Sach1ng/PM-operating-OS★ 3same name
- 0xelitesystem/claude-skills-templates★ 2same name
- ouachitalabs/skills★ 2same name
- youdcode/open-company★ 2same name
- ianklassen/ai-pm-system★ 1same name
- jingjing-yxng/claude-skills★ 0same name
- JScottCarter/Claude_skills★ 0same name
2 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- account-contextSkill
- account-planSkill
- account-reviewSkill
- adoption-planSkill
- advocacy-askSkill
- book-reviewSkill
- book-triageSkill
- business-reviewSkill
- call-prepSkill
- call-recapSkill
- champion-lossSkill
- churn-postmortemSkill
- coachingSkill
- commitmentsSkill
- coverage-modelSkill
- csm-hiringSkill
- csm-rampSkill
- csql-motionSkill
- cs-scorecardSkill
- cs-startSkill
- customer-updateSkill
- day-planSkill
- email-criticSkill
- escalationSkill
- exec-conversationSkill
- expansion-caseSkill
- expansion-scanSkill
- handoffSkill
- hard-conversationSkill
- health-scoreSkill
- internal-askSkill
- invoice-chaseSkill
- mutual-action-planSkill
- nrr-narrativeSkill
- offboardingSkill
- onboarding-planSkill
- playbook-builderSkill
- portfolio-reviewSkill
- price-increaseSkill
- renewal-forecastSkill
- renewal-negotiationSkill
- renewal-riskSkill
- renewal-runwaySkill
- sales-handoffSkill
- save-planSkill
- stakeholder-mapSkill
- status-updateSkill
- survey-follow-upSkill
- team-rollupSkill
- usage-emailSkill
- value-ledgerSkill
- voice-of-customerSkill
- what-do-i-oweSkill
- skill-nameSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
If the user has said what happened, who forwards it and who reads it, go.
- Distinctive: line 19
Never wait. If an "Account context" block exists in the conversation, use its value metric as the unit.
- Distinctive: line 23
Name the document type: before writing: decision (reader must choose), information (reader must hold an accurate view), or advocacy …
- Distinctive: line 63
Their words, not yours: Every product or tier name costs a line of explanation and marks the page as external.
- Distinctive: line 64
A number nobody can check is decoration: Only your dashboard can confirm it, so nobody can disagree, so nobody believes it.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
One Pager
The user walks away with one page, in the sponsor's words, that a stranger can act on in forty seconds, and the covering line to send it.
Start here
If the user has said what happened, who forwards it and who reads it, go. Otherwise ask in ONE message:
- What should the reader know or decide
- Who forwards it, and to whom (the reader was not in the room)
- The sponsor's own words for the project and metrics
Never wait. If an "Account context" block exists in the conversation, use its value metric as the unit. Gaps become "(assumed, confirm)".
Do this
- Name the document type before writing: decision (reader must choose), information (reader must hold an accurate view), or advocacy (forwarder is arguing for something). A decision brief with no decision in it is the common failure.
- Write the first three lines: the conclusion; why it matters to them in cost, risk, revenue or time; the ask, or "nothing is being asked."
- Use the forwarder's vocabulary. Their project name, their metric names. No product tiers, no logo, no vendor template.
- Add three or four short sections, each heading meaningful alone. One page means one page; if it does not fit, cut scope.
- Make every number theirs and checkable: their unit, a source and date, estimates labeled with the basis.
- Answer the one question the forwarder will get (cost, what if we stop, is it working, who else): inside the page, briefly.
- Write the forwarder line: one or two sentences the sponsor would actually type. Deliver as body text, not a PDF, and ask the sponsor to read it first.
Output
TYPE: decision / information / advocacy | For: [reader] | Via: [sponsor]
[Line 1: conclusion]
[Line 2: why it matters to them]
[Line 3: the ask, or none]
[Heading]: [short paragraph]
[Heading]: [short paragraph]
[Heading]: [short paragraph]
Numbers: [value, their unit, source, date, actual or estimate]
The question they will ask: [question] - [answer]
Forwarder line: "[what the sponsor types above it]"
Before it goes: sponsor reads it; no claim they do not hold
What I could not check
- [gap]Decision briefs list the options considered and what happens if the reader does nothing.
A filled example is in examples/sample.md. assets/one-pager-template.md is the same page to fill by hand.
Rules
- The sponsor is the client. Their name is on it when they send it, so a claim they do not already believe gets deleted, and they trust your next page less.
- Conclusion in the first three lines. Most readers stop there, and that is a successful page, not a failed one.
- No logo, no branding. The moment it looks like a vendor document it is read as a pitch, not as information.
- Their words, not yours. Every product or tier name costs a line of explanation and marks the page as external.
- A number nobody can check is decoration. Only your dashboard can confirm it, so nobody can disagree, so nobody believes it.
- Shrinking the font is avoiding the cut. Length reads as effort to the writer and as an obstacle to the reader.
- The forwarder line does more work than the page. Almost nobody writes it for the sponsor, so the highest-leverage sentence is left to someone in a hurry.
- Ship editable text. A PDF cannot be pasted into a message, and the sponsor will paste it.
Related (only if installed)
expansion-case when the page is a budget case. business-review when it is the leave-behind from a review. email-critic on the covering message.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

