Review or re-review Scapy pull requests, branches, patches, and protocol implementations for correctness, simplicity, Scapy-likeness, backwards compatibility, robustness, performance, and tests. Compare old and new code, trace prior human review comments to their subsequent fixes, and return concise, evidence-backed, actionable findings rather than speculative suggestions.
Steady10 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
13k5y agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Review a Polar branch diff against conventions, Accepted ADRs, reuse, slop, and path-triggered API, ship-safety, and billing lenses. Use before opening a PR, when the user asks for a Polar code review, /polar-code-review, or $polar-code-review. Not a bug hunt or security review.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
10k5d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review Rabby browser-extension pull requests for actionable correctness, wallet-safety, security, privacy, build, and supply-chain issues, and publish validated inline GitHub findings. Use when Codex is asked to review a Rabby PR or its changed code; do not use it to implement fixes unless separately requested.
1.9k3mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Token-efficient code review using Tree-sitter AST graphs and MCP. Cuts AI token usage on large codebases by computing the blast radius of changes instead of reading entire codebases. Uses a SQLite graph database for structural analysis.
8.2k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Repository-wide MSAL.NET pull request review for correctness, behavioral compatibility, public API contracts, protocol behavior, caching, concurrency, transports, platforms, packaging, performance, security, privacy, and test adequacy. Use before reviewing any pull request in this repository.
Steady6 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
1.5k3y agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review USWDS PRs or branches using the core team's calibrated judgment. Enforces 16 specific gates (size, dependencies, DRY, sanitization, test regression, etc.), distinguishes personal preference from what all consumers inherit, and routes specialist decisions (accessibility, breaking changes, new API surface). Use when the user says "review this", "code review", "review the PR", asks for feedback on changes, or explicitly invokes /uswds-code-review.
7.2k59d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use only when the user explicitly requests a review or audit of backend code under `api/`. Supports pending-change, file-focused, and pasted-diff reviews. Do not use for implementation-only requests, diagnosis without review intent, frontend code, or backend code outside `api/`.
6 projects use a version of this
161k17d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review backend code for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices based on established checklist rules. Use when the user requests a review, analysis, or improvement of backend files (e.g., `.py`) under the `src/backend/` directory. Do NOT use for frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Supports pending-change review, code snippets review, and file-focused review.
6 projects use a version of this
157k21d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review code against Asterinas's persona-keyed coding guidelines and write a Markdown review file. Use when asked to review a Git change (diff mode) or a set of target files (files mode) for defects, or inside a write-test-review loop.
5.1k14d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
The code review workflow for this Gradle repository. Use whenever the user asks to review code, perform/do a code review, review a change, diff, branch, or PR, or check changes before they reach the target branch. Prefer this over any generic code-review skill when working in this repo.
19k19d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Code review criteria — the five review axes, core principles, severity format, and verdict for reviewing code changes. Loaded by the reviewer subagent of the review-code flow. Not a user-facing flow — to review code, use the review-code flow.
Steady6 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
62k2mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Plain text files in a repository that tell a coding agent how the project works: commands to run, conventions to follow and things to avoid. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, cursor rules and skills are the common kinds.
CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md?
CLAUDE.md is read by Claude Code. AGENTS.md is an open format that Codex, Cursor and other agents read. Many projects keep one and point the other at it.
What is a skill?
A folder with a SKILL.md that describes one capability, such as filling PDFs or reviewing code. The agent loads it only when the task calls for it.
Can I search my own team's files too?
Your agents already can, over MCP, limited to the files you're allowed to read. Searching them from this page is coming.