Review a GitHub PR for bugs, security, performance, and code quality. Use when asked to review a PR or give pull request feedback. Don't use for local uncommitted changes, creating PRs, or merging.
Review code changes for correctness, conventions, performance, security, and test coverage. Use for: PR review, regression-risk analysis, Biome/TypeScript convention checks, API auth and validation review, block/tool contract audits, and severity-ordered findings.
Review diffs, pull requests, commits, patches, or source files for correctness, baseline security, performance, maintainability, tests, and integration risk. Use for ordinary read-only review, edge-case audits, PR preflight, and reviewer simulation; use audit-code-security when security is the primary objective, and harden-code-paths to fix confirmed failure modes.
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \"review since X\".
Perform structured code reviews focusing on correctness, readability, security, and maintainability. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests, evaluating code changes, or establishing review standards for a team.
Review changed code (session, current branch, or colleague's branch) for principle violations, reinvented wheels, and dead code. Trigger after coding, before merge, or for PR review.
Multi-agent deep review for code PRs in any repo. Use when asked to "deep review this PR," "multi-agent review," "review #N with subagents," "thorough review of this branch," or "is this PR ready to merge." Orchestrates Copilot + parallel subagents (adversarial, operational, reference-comparison) with scope-based escalation, stale-finding triage, and a hard iteration cap.
Code review changed, staged, last-commit, and merge or PR work against requirements and the repository style guide. Use when reviewing current work, staged changes, the last commit, a branch, a merge, or a pull request. For a whole-codebase style audit use ng-review-style-guide instead.
Systematic code review patterns covering security, performance, maintainability, correctness, and testing — with severity levels, structured feedback guidance, review process, and anti-patterns to avoid. Use when reviewing PRs, establishing review standards, or improving review quality.
Use when reviewing git diffs, local changes, or pull requests for merge-relevant risks: correctness regressions, security/privacy, data integrity, performance, reliability, tests, UX, maintainability, and deployability. Produce evidence-backed findings, inline comments when available, and a reviewer-facing summary focused on findings, residual risk, questions, and readiness.
Review Luau code for style compliance, type safety, server authority, error handling, and performance. Use for reviewing a file, a PR-sized change, or a whole module.
AI-driven code review workflow that reviews uncommitted changes using a discoverable reviewer profile, presents findings for human decision, and iterates until approved. Supports --unattended for automated iteration. Use when reviewing code before commit or PR. Activated by commands: /start, /continue, /clean.
Use before commit, deploy, or PR merge, or when operator asks "review this diff" / "is this safe?"; reviews diff vs spec, decisions, maintainability, scope, tests, rollback. Do NOT write or fix code — review only.
Code review a pull request or recent changes using git diff and agent teams. Reviews code usage, efficiency, bugs, and comments. Backs up unused files to bk/.
Automated code review analyzing diffs for test coverage, code quality, architecture conformance, and security. Produces structured findings and optionally creates beads for issues found. Use when user says "review code", "code review", "review my changes", "check this branch", "/code-review", or wants automated quality analysis before merging.
Plain text files in a repository that tell a coding agent how the project works: commands to run, conventions to follow and things to avoid. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, cursor rules and skills are the common kinds.
CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md?
CLAUDE.md is read by Claude Code. AGENTS.md is an open format that Codex, Cursor and other agents read. Many projects keep one and point the other at it.
What is a skill?
A folder with a SKILL.md that describes one capability, such as filling PDFs or reviewing code. The agent loads it only when the task calls for it.
Can I search my own team's files too?
Your agents already can, over MCP, limited to the files you're allowed to read. Searching them from this page is coming.