Senior engineer code review focused on catching issues before they become PR comments. Reviews only changed lines, categorizes issues by priority, and fixes them one by one. Use when the user says "code review", "review my code", "review this branch", or wants pre-PR feedback.
Review llama.cpp changes against project conventions and common reviewer pitfalls before a PR. Use when the user wants to review a diff, branch, or PR.
Review a named diff or PR for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use when asked to review code or when a shipping skill needs a review receipt. Use when asked to apply this review's findings locally. Use ce-resolve-pr-feedback for feedback already left on a PR.
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use when reviewing a pull request in the deepseek-harness repo — orients the reviewer to this codebase's standards (AGENTS.md conventions, defensive patterns, ADRs, quality gates) and the review-specific checks that code alone can't show
Run a local pre-push AI code review of the current branch with the OpenAI `codex` CLI, the same way ClickHouse CI does, and optionally iterate fix and re-review until clean. Use when asked to review the current branch before pushing, run "the codex review" / "the AI review" locally, or get an independent second opinion on a diff. Not for reviewing someone else's PR on GitHub (CI already does that).
name: code-reviewer
description:
Use this skill to reviewcode. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree)
and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses
Review a Jolt pull request with extreme thoroughness, outside CI, before an authorized account attests a clean review of its exact head: a lead reviewer fans out parallel subagents that hunt bugs and tech debt, and runs checks in a credential-free sandbox. USE FOR: - Reviewing a pull request before attesting it - Posting one review to a PR when a reviewer routine asks for it TRIGGERS: - "review PR", "code review", "review changes" - "diff review", "PR feedback", "check PR" - "analyze diff", "critique code", "review code" - "pull request review", "GitHub PR review"
1.1k9d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Delegation mode for open-code-review (OCR). Instead of OCR calling an LLM endpoint, this skill instructs the host agent to perform the code review itself, using OCR only for deterministic engineering: file selection and rule resolution. Use when the host agent should drive the review with its own LLM capabilities.
40k38d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a diff, branch, or PR against correctness, security, breaking-change, and quality standards — runs the validation gate, applies the built-in checklist plus any repo-local one, and produces severity-ranked findings with an approve/request-changes verdict. The review engine behind om-auto-review-pr and om-review-prs.
2.6k3mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Have Codex independently review an existing implementation plan while Claude coordinates a bounded revision loop. For automatic reviewer selection from either host, use claudex-loop with mode=review.
Hope-native review of uncommitted, staged, commit, branch, or PR changes: discover concrete regressions, independently verify candidates, and report actionable findings first without speculative noise.
No other project uses it yet
1.9k7mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Code review by Codex (GPT) instead of reviewing your own change: hand the change and what it is for to `scripts/codex-review.sh` (Codex at xhigh effort), check every finding against the code, then fix or report it. Review in this session only when Codex is unavailable. Use whenever a code review is asked for — \"сделай ревью\", \"проверь изменения\", \"ревью и поправь\", \"review this\", \"review before committing\" — unless the request names another reviewer.
Review code changes with several independent reviewers in parallel, then triage and present the findings. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"
Performs AI-powered code review on Git changes using the `ocr` CLI from alibaba/open-code-review. Use when the user asks to review code, review a pull request, review staged/unstaged changes, review a commit, or compare branches for code quality issues. Produces line-level review comments and can automatically apply fixes when requested. With appropriate review rules, can detect various types of issues including bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance problems, and code quality concerns.
52k3mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Plain text files in a repository that tell a coding agent how the project works: commands to run, conventions to follow and things to avoid. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, cursor rules and skills are the common kinds.
CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md?
CLAUDE.md is read by Claude Code. AGENTS.md is an open format that Codex, Cursor and other agents read. Many projects keep one and point the other at it.
What is a skill?
A folder with a SKILL.md that describes one capability, such as filling PDFs or reviewing code. The agent loads it only when the task calls for it.
Can I search my own team's files too?
Your agents already can, over MCP, limited to the files you're allowed to read. Searching them from this page is coming.