Structured code reviews with severity-ranked findings and deep multi-agent mode. Use when performing a code review, auditing code quality, or critiquing PRs, MRs, or diffs, including a diff or patch pasted inline. For the full multi-agent workflow, use the ia-review command (/ia-review in Claude Code).
PR review, code smell detection, best practice kontrolü. ⚠️ Kod incelerken kullan. Deliverable kontrolü için → quality-validator, doküman review için → peer-review.
AI code review for PR or local changes. 280+ checks across security, architecture, performance, testing, and code quality. Posts findings as GitHub PR comments with confidence scores.
Architectural and quality review of one or more files. Verifies coding standards, SOLID, testability, mobile anti-patterns, and ADR compliance. Use after /dev-story and before /story-done.
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Request or perform a git-backed code review for a defined diff or SHA range using implementation context and requirements. Use when finishing a task, completing a major feature, preparing to merge, or when you need a fresh review before proceeding.
Senior embedded-engineer code review. Defaults to Classic AUTOSAR embedded C and covers two concerns: (1) Correctness review — integer overflow, volatile correctness, ISR/task race conditions, stack usage, dynamic memory, control flow, AUTOSAR/ISO 26262 readiness, with findings rated Critical/Major/Minor; (2) Naming review — AUTOSAR Classic conventions for modules, SWC types, port names, runnables, C identifiers, typedefs, macros, and enumerations, aligned with MISRA Rule 5.x identifier uniqueness. Audits existing code and generates correctly-named identifiers for new work. Handles Adaptive AUTOSAR C++14+ when the input is C++ or names ara::, reviewing RAII, exceptions vs ara::core::Result, smart pointers, and AUTOSAR C++14 / MISRA C++:2023 naming. A third focus, legacy modernization assessment, proposes the smallest safe steps toward a MISRA-conformant, MCAL-abstracted, unit-tested state. Returns decision-ready findings with a built-in self-check and can emit a self-contained HTML report under analysis/.
Performs a structured, comprehensive code review of git changes. Detects stack and architecture automatically, applies relevant stack/pattern-specific rules, and reports findings by severity. Use when: user runs /code-review, /review-pr, or asks to "review my changes".
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
name: code-reviewer
description:
Use this skill to reviewcode. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree)
and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses
Internal correctness + simplification review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks correctness, error handling, duplication, dead code, and simplification opportunities against the project's own conventions. Findings only; never edits code.
AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed (code/PR/quality/security).
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, PR, or merge-base) on two axes — Standards (does it follow this repo's documented rules?) and Spec (does it do what the originating issue asked?). Each axis returns a verdict per enumerated item rather than an open-ended list of findings, so a round terminates. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, working-tree changes, or asks to "review since X"; and again after fixes, to review the fix.
Plain text files in a repository that tell a coding agent how the project works: commands to run, conventions to follow and things to avoid. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, cursor rules and skills are the common kinds.
CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md?
CLAUDE.md is read by Claude Code. AGENTS.md is an open format that Codex, Cursor and other agents read. Many projects keep one and point the other at it.
What is a skill?
A folder with a SKILL.md that describes one capability, such as filling PDFs or reviewing code. The agent loads it only when the task calls for it.
Can I search my own team's files too?
Your agents already can, over MCP, limited to the files you're allowed to read. Searching them from this page is coming.