code-review
jellydn/my-ai-tools/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review a branch, PR, or worktree diff for repository conventions and stated intent.
One search for your own team's files and the public ecosystem. See how real projects write their agent instructions, and bring the good ideas home.
jellydn/my-ai-tools/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review a branch, PR, or worktree diff for repository conventions and stated intent.
Kangentic/kangentic/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review git changes for quality and conventions via parallel reviewer subagents synthesized in the main agent (auto-fixes findings, fills red-green test-coverage holes, and commits that pass locally by default)
avibebuilder/claude-prime/.claude/skills/review-code/SKILL.md
Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but when plans, specs, task artifacts, or prior discussion exist, use them to understand why the code exists before judging it.
extra-org/extra/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Senior-level code review for the agent platform — architecture and boundaries first, then correctness, security, testability, and simplicity. Outputs a structured review.
Dimon94/dverity/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \"review since X\".
oaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro/.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Use this skill for GitHub Copilot pull request and code reviews in oaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro. Review Python MCP server changes, KiCad adapter and tool-contract changes, tests, npm/package wrappers, Tauri/Rust desktop code, GitHub Actions, security controls, documentation, generated metadata, and compatibility/release surfaces. Use it whenever reviewing a PR or diff in this repository, especially changes under src/, tests/, packages/, src-tauri/, .github/workflows/, or public MCP metadata/configuration.
Chris-debug-0225/learn-claude-code-java/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Perform thorough code reviews with security, performance, and maintainability analysis. Use when user asks to review code, check for bugs, or audit a codebase.
dalemoncayo/fullcase-web/.agents/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Shared review rules for automated PR reviews and local manual reviews. Triggered by review commands.
dalemoncayo/fullcase-web/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Run code review in an independent agent. Automatically used after code implementation or fixes. Triggered by "review this", "code review", "code check", "look at this PR", "check the diff", "is this code OK?".
microsoft/webui/.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Framework code review checklist - correctness, performance, concurrency, design, and style.
buildomator/buildomator/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems
AIBiz-Automatyzacje/claude-code-starter/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Przeprowadza code review dla React 19, TailwindCSS v4, shadcn/ui, Supabase, Sentry. Używaj przy przeglądaniu PR, ocenie implementacji fazy/etapu, weryfikacji zgodności z planem. Generuje raport z klasyfikacją problemów (krytyczne/poważne/drobne/sugestie).
striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios/.agents/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.
duongthinh03/portfolio/.agents/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
fitlab-ai/agent-infra/.agents/skills/review-code/SKILL.md
审查代码实现并输出代码审查报告。 当代码实现需要在合入前接受审查时使用。 仅当对话包含可解析的任务引用时才可自动调用本技能。
csy-csy123/pr-review-agent-council/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Perform thorough code reviews with security, performance, and maintainability analysis. Use when user asks to review code, check for bugs, or audit a codebase.
jjanczur/tyran/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
The depth half of a review - the dimensions a diff is read against (correctness, boundaries, concurrency, failure paths, secrets, data access, structure, test quality) and the rule that a finding is refuted before it is reported. The verdict stays with the reviewer agent. Use when reviewing a diff or a pull request, or when asked about N+1 queries or wasted round trips.
AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards/.claude/skills/code-review-assistant/SKILL.md
[UDS] 系統性程式碼審查的參考資料:八大審查類別,以及 BLOCKING/IMPORTANT/SUGGESTION 評論前綴。 Use when: 審查 pull request 或 diff、決定審查意見的措辭與優先序、與團隊議定審查範圍。 Not for: 執行有關卡的審查流程——該部分已移至採用層(XSPEC-095);提交前的關卡驗證——請用 /checkin。 Keywords: code review, pull request review, review checklist, BLOCKING, comment prefix, 程式碼審查, 審查類別, 評論前綴, 審查清單.
AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards/skills/code-review-assistant/SKILL.md
[UDS] Reference for systematic code review: eight review categories and BLOCKING/IMPORTANT/SUGGESTION comment prefixes. Use when: reviewing a pull request or diff, deciding how to phrase and prioritise review comments, agreeing review scope with a team. Not for: executing a gated review workflow — that moved to the adoption layer (XSPEC-095); pre-commit gate verification — use /checkin. Keywords: code review, pull request review, review checklist, BLOCKING, comment prefix, 程式碼審查, 審查類別, 評論前綴.
oprogramadorreal/optimus-claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Reviews local changes, an open PR/MR, or a branch diff for bugs, security issues, and violations of the project's own coding guidelines, through review lenses applied inline on a small diff or in parallel agents on a larger one. Excludes style and linter-catchable issues. Read-only: applies fixes or posts PR/MR comments only on explicit approval. For an iterative auto-fix loop, use /optimus:deep review.
Plain text files in a repository that tell a coding agent how the project works: commands to run, conventions to follow and things to avoid. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, cursor rules and skills are the common kinds.
CLAUDE.md is read by Claude Code. AGENTS.md is an open format that Codex, Cursor and other agents read. Many projects keep one and point the other at it.
A folder with a SKILL.md that describes one capability, such as filling PDFs or reviewing code. The agent loads it only when the task calls for it.
Your agents already can, over MCP, limited to the files you're allowed to read. Searching them from this page is coming.