Judge a supplied subject against the project's evidence and constraints. Use when assessing an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a supplied approach set. Use for an oracle panel to consult other models and reconcile their opinions. Use ce-explain for understanding and ce-doc-review for findings review.
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Publish, read, comment on, or edit markdown in Proof. Use for Proof links, sharing specs/plans/drafts, or publish handoffs from planning workflows; avoid proofread, math, evidence, or proof-of-concept meanings.
4 projects use a version of this
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Build a throwaway prototype to answer how something should work, feel, or read. Use when committing the wrong answer would be expensive to unravel and a cheap sketch cannot settle it. Not a rough visual probe during brainstorming, not for deciding what to build, not polishing a feature that already works, not implementing the real thing.
4 projects use a version of this
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Judge PR feedback centrally, apply valid fixes, and complete review conversations with publication verified. Use when addressing feedback already left on a PR, preparing local fixes for a caller to publish, or completing a saved feedback batch. Use ce-code-review for reviewing code before feedback exists.
5 projects use a version of this
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Retune a skill corpus for a new model, measurement-first: mine the run archive for a baseline, establish a noise floor, audit the corpus adversarially, then cut in measured passes until a pre-registered bar clears. Requires a benchmark harness that can A/B two builds of the corpus; refuses without one.
3 projects use a version of this
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Analyze recorded product feedback into evidence for bugs and requirements. Use when a Riffrec capture or other screen, voice, or notes artifact needs interpretation. Use for Riffrec setup, capture, or sharing help when no recording exists yet.
4 projects use a version of this
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Check Compound Engineering's tools and repo config and fix what it finds, scaffold a Compound Pack with `pack:<id>`, or draft and refresh coding standards and review docs from pull request history. Use when setting up or diagnosing Compound Engineering, or when creating or updating CODING_STANDARDS.md or REVIEW.md, including on a schedule.
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Simplify code for clarity, reuse, quality, and efficiency while preserving behavior, and prune tests and comments that carry no value. Use after implementation and before review, or to audit tests or comments in any part of a repo; use ce-debug for bugs.
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Sweep configured feedback sources (Slack, GitHub Issues; email experimental) for new items: acknowledge at source, analyze recordings, verify fixes merged to main, and emit an `lfg`-ready plan. First run sets up sources; supports mode:non-interactive for scheduled runs.
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Execute a plan or concrete work prompt end-to-end. Use when implementing from a plan document, a spec path, or a clear build request; use ce-debug for open-ended bugs. Use when an outer orchestrator needs implementation and local verification only, without the shipping tail.
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Set up isolated git worktrees — create a new branch for fresh work, or attach a worktree to an existing branch, PR, or commit. Use when starting isolated work or isolating an existing ref.
5 projects use a version of this
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Take a request all the way to done, hands-off, through the right Compound Engineering skills. A code change ends as an open pull request, pushed without stopping. Use only when the user explicitly asks for autonomous end-to-end work or invokes lfg directly. Use ce-plan, ce-work, ce-debug, or ce-commit-push-pr for work the user reviews step by step.
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Explain the last message, or a supplied file, link, or passage, in plain language a person follows on the first read. Use when the user invokes wtf because they did not follow something. Use ce-explain to investigate how or why code works, and ce-noslop to rewrite prose.
RubyLLM::Skills is a Ruby gem that implements the Agent Skills specification for RubyLLM. It enables progressive disclosure of AI capabilities through a three-level pattern: metadata (~100 tokens), full instructions (SKILL.md), and on-demand resources (scripts, references, assets). The gem uses the RubyLLM::Skills namespace (matches the parent ruby_llm gem): Progressive Disclosure: Skills load in three stages to minimize context usage: 1. Metadata (name + description) - loaded at startup, injected into system prompt 2. Full instructions (SKILL.md) - loaded when LLM determines…
3810mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Plain text files in a repository that tell a coding agent how the project works: commands to run, conventions to follow and things to avoid. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, cursor rules and skills are the common kinds.
CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md?
CLAUDE.md is read by Claude Code. AGENTS.md is an open format that Codex, Cursor and other agents read. Many projects keep one and point the other at it.
What is a skill?
A folder with a SKILL.md that describes one capability, such as filling PDFs or reviewing code. The agent loads it only when the task calls for it.
Can I search my own team's files too?
Your agents already can, over MCP, limited to the files you're allowed to read. Searching them from this page is coming.