One search for your own team's files and the public ecosystem. See how real projects write their agent instructions, and bring the good ideas home.
Hollis36SkillHollis36/claude-skill/code-review/SKILL.md
科研代码审查助手，专注于确保科研代码的正确性、可重复性和可维护性。支持代码质量检查、安全漏洞扫描、可重复性验证、数据完整性检查、最佳实践验证。当用户需要：(1) 审查科研代码质量、(2) 确保实验代码可重复、(3) 检查数据分析脚本、(4) 验证统计分析代码、(5) 准备代码发布或提交论文时触发。关键词：code review、代码审查、代码质量、peer review、科研代码。
itsaspacestationSkillitsaspacestation/natural-intelligence/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Use when the user asks for a full review of a change, pull request, or merge request against the personal checklist, covering design, tests, performance, security, and correctness. Also use when the user asks to read, address, answer, or reply to reviewer comments or threads, or to prepare a plan from reviewer feedback, on any platform, including GitLab merge requests through glab: MR discussions, unresolved threads, suggestion blocks, glab auth.
j99way99Skillj99way99/claude-skills/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
이미 작성된 코드나 변경분(diff, PR, 브랜치)을 검토할 때 사용한다. "이 PR 봐줘", "이 코드 리뷰해줘", "머지해도 되나", "이 변경 위험한가" 같은 요청에 트리거된다. 리뷰 범위 확정 → 위험도 분류 → 근거 있는 지적 → 보고 형식까지의 절차를 다루며, Java/Spring 코드일 경우 references/spring.md 체크리스트를 함께 적용한다. 새 코드를 작성하는 것이 목적이면 java-spring-backend를, 이미 발생한 버그의 원인을 찾는 것이 목적이면 debugging을 쓴다.
jarosser06Skilljarosser06/drift/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Expert in conducting thorough code reviews for Python projects using GitHub MCP, covering test coverage, security practices, PEP 8 compliance, and code organization. Use when reviewing code or PRs.
JayMeDotDotSkillJayMeDotDot/jmdd-agent-skills/skills/coder-review/SKILL.md
Use when reviewing PRs, diffs, or code changes. Covers correctness, performance, quality, compatibility, and issue tracking.
jd-solankiSkilljd-solanki/krutrimbox/.agents/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo''s documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
jgeorgeai11Skilljgeorgeai11/claude_code_resources/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review code files against project standards. Use when reviewing one or more code files, a module, or changed files; coupled files are reviewed together in one worker, and every file gets its own review file.
jpoindexterSkilljpoindexter/theft-kit/code-review/SKILL.md
Review code for project standards, design system, security, and best practices
leonardoaraujosantosSkillleonardoaraujosantos/my_ai_skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review changed code for architecture compliance, security vulnerabilities, test coverage, and code quality. Enforces Hexagonal Architecture for backend and MVVM for frontend. Detects test gaps and runs tests when possible. Use when reviewing a PR, branch diff, or staged changes.
lldwbSkilllldwb/lldwb-claude-skills/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
代码评审（多对象）——按评审对象分五种模式：提交评审（指定修订号）、合并评审（分支区间 / merge 提交）、模块评审（指定模块/目录）、项目整体评审（全仓横切面）、架构评审（分层与依赖结构），只检查不改代码。当用户要求"评审某个提交/PR 的质量""检查提交是否符合规范""排查某次提交引入的问题""这次提交有没有问题""这个 MR 能不能合""评审这个模块的代码质量""看看项目整体质量/健康度""评估一下项目架构/分层与依赖设计"时使用——先识别评审对象与模式再取数，不局限于 diff 或表面结构，深入阅读涉及的函数、模块与调用链；每条判断必须指回具体证据（diff 行 / 代码位置 / 命令输出）；提交/合并评审结论二值（存在问题/无问题），模块/项目/架构评审输出分级问题报告；只检查不改代码，不自动修复、不自动提交。即使未明确说"用 skill"，只要涉及代码质量评审就应使用。需要落地修复评审发现的问题用 bug-fix；只是把工作区改动提交到本地用 commit-create。
loqz99156Skillloqz99156/grill-sol-terra/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review a diff along Standards plus code-smell and Spec plus ticket axes. Use automatically as the mandatory total closing gate after run-delivery finishes all implement tickets, or standalone for any supplied Git range, staged diff, working-tree diff, patch file, or diff text.
MarkBoveeSkillMarkBovee/agent-skills-kit/.github/skills/ask-code-review/SKILL.md
Use when code changed and a meaningful diff is ready; fresh eyes should catch requirement gaps, regressions, or risky design mistakes before handoff or success claims. Common triggers: review, nakijken, pull request, code review, fresh eyes, start reviewing, review deze wijziging, check de wijziging, review changes, second look, bekijk de diff, controleer de code, code check, diff review, PR review.
MarkBoveeSkillMarkBovee/agent-skills-kit/skills/ask-code-review/SKILL.md
Use when code changed and a meaningful diff is ready; fresh eyes should catch requirement gaps, regressions, or risky design mistakes before handoff or success claims.
Marnie0415SkillMarnie0415/pi-skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review code changes for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and maintainability. Use when asked to review code, a PR, a diff, or recent changes with Opus-level thoroughness.
mauroepceSkillmauroepce/claude-workspace/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Critical code-quality review of staged changes (or specified files). Catches the classes of issues that pass tests but bite later — bad naming, hidden complexity, missing edge cases, weak test coverage, performance traps. Use before /safe-commit, or standalone when reviewing your own diff before pushing for human PR review.
mblaubergSkillmblauberg/provenant/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Use for source-read-only review of a PR, diff, commit, migration, refactor, or implementation through its dependency cone. Not for root-cause diagnosis, authorised fixes, or browser/UX review; use diagnose, implement, or ui-ux-design.
michaelsvanbeekSkillmichaelsvanbeek/personal-agent-skills/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Code review practices and pull request quality standards. Use when: reviewing a pull request, preparing code for review, writing review comments, checking for common issues, establishing review guidelines, auditing an existing project's review practices, or improving PR quality standards. Integrates linting, testing, security, and CI/CD checks into a cohesive review workflow.
misty-stepSkillmisty-step/laboratory/.agents/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Parallel multi-agent review for Laboratory changes. Prioritizes correctness, scientific validity, provenance, tests, and harness fit. Trigger: /code-review, /review, /critique.
mmungdongSkillmmungdong/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review code for actionable defects. Correctness is the core; performance and security are optional sub-cases of the same engine. Anchors on agreements between participants across a boundary, forces a violating execution, and refutes every candidate before reporting. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, audit a codebase, or check whether a fix is safe.
MSILycanthropySkillMSILycanthropy/skills/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Review code changes, diffs, outstanding changes, or modified files. Use when asked to review, check, or analyze code quality, changes, uncommitted work, or changes since diverging from a branch (e.g., main).
Plain text files in a repository that tell a coding agent how the project works: commands to run, conventions to follow and things to avoid. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, cursor rules and skills are the common kinds.
CLAUDE.md is read by Claude Code. AGENTS.md is an open format that Codex, Cursor and other agents read. Many projects keep one and point the other at it.
A folder with a SKILL.md that describes one capability, such as filling PDFs or reviewing code. The agent loads it only when the task calls for it.
Your agents already can, over MCP, limited to the files you're allowed to read. Searching them from this page is coming.
