name: skill-doli-code-review
description:
Reviews Dolibarr PHP code for compliance with coding standards and security best practices, and fixes identified issues.
Use when the user asks to review
No other project uses it yet
7.8k17d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Adversarial dual-model code review that runs two AI models in parallel, cross-references findings, and produces a consensus severity table with fix confidence ratings. Use when asked for a thorough code review, adversarial review, dual-model review, confidence-rated review, or 'Hanselman review'.
1 project uses a version of this
2.2k11d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review Xtensa assembly code for ESP32 platforms. Checks for critical errors in inline assembly, ABI compliance, and optimization opportunities. Use after modifying ESP32 assembly or inline asm code.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
7.5k54d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a PR for correctness, security, code quality, and testing issues. TRIGGER when user asks to review a PR, check PR quality, or give feedback on a PR.
Steady5 mentions in 2 weeks
195 projects use a version of this
188k1d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
This skill should be used when the user asks to review a diff or pull request, write review comments, audit code quality, establish review standards, or improve how a team performs code review.
5.9k7mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review Java OpenInference instrumentation code for correctness and completeness. Use this skill when reviewing a Java instrumentor package — whether it's a new instrumentor, a PR that modifies one, or when the user asks to audit/review/check an existing instrumentor's code quality. Trigger on phrases like "review the instrumentor", "check the Java code", "audit the package", "is this instrumentor correct", or any request to validate an OpenInference Java instrumentation package against project standards.
No other project uses it yet
1.3k16d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review C#/.NET code changes to the AG-UI .NET SDK (sdks/dotnet/) against its specific conventions and architectural rules — AOT serialization, the "no ASP.NET in src/" boundary, the PublicAPI analyzer workflow, wire compatibility with the TypeScript reference, and the house style (sealed/no-records/ConfigureAwait). Runs a phased, rule-by-rule review. USE FOR: reviewing a PR, diff, or branch that touches sdks/dotnet/; checking a new event/message type; verifying serialization, package placement, or public-API changes in the .NET SDK. DO NOT USE FOR: generic C# style nits already enforced by analyzers/EditorConfig; reviewing the TypeScript SDK (sdks/typescript/) or Python SDK (sdks/python/); writing new features (only flag violations, never rewrite code).
Steady6 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
18k9mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a Slate PR or a Plate PR based on `main` with Plate v2's research, code and tests from `next`, prove each finding on the PR's head, and draft the GitHub review comment. Use for /review-comment <PR>, a request to draft a review comment on such a PR, or a request for insights from Plate v2's past work on one.
Steady6 mentions in 2 weeks
2 projects use a version of this
17k10d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
4.2k6mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review PRs and source code changes in Formisch packages/ and frameworks/. Use when reviewing pull requests, validating implementation patterns, or checking code quality before merging.
2 projects use a version of this
1.2k19d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Read-only R code review protocol for `.R` scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, tidyverse idioms, and professional standards; produces a report without editing. Use when user says "review this R script", "check the R code", "audit the analysis code", "code review on the R", or when an R file is touched as part of a paper submission. NOT for running the code — pair with `/audit-reproducibility` for numeric verification.
Steady3 mentions in 2 weeks
3 projects use a version of this
1.7k9d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Read-only R code review protocol for `.R` scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, tidyverse idioms, and professional standards; produces a report without editing. Use when user says "review this R script", "check the R code", "audit the analysis code", "code review on the R", or when an R file is touched as part of a paper submission. NOT for running the code — pair with `/audit-reproducibility` for numeric verification.
Steady3 mentions in 2 weeks
3 projects use a version of this
1.7k9d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a Deno runtime pull request for correctness, tests, security, and conventions. Use when asked to review a PR or when a PR number/URL is provided for review.
109k6mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Code review guidelines for the copilot-api Bun/TypeScript API gateway. Use when reviewing code changes, pull requests, or uncommitted work in this repository. Defines the review workflow, evidence standards, severity levels, a project-specific checklist (protocol translation, streaming, auth/credentials, proxy/TLS, config/state), verification commands, and the structured CODE_REVIEW_SUMMARY output format. All review output is written in English.
No other project uses it yet
1.1k24d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review PyTorch pull requests for code quality, security, and backward compatibility. Use when reviewing PRs, when asked to review code changes, or when the user mentions "review PR", "code review", or "check this PR".
106k3d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Reviews Home Assistant code changes and provides constructive feedback. Should be used when a review is requested to provide a consistent review behavior and output format. This skill can be used for code reviews in general, not just for GitHub pull requests.
1 project uses a version of this
92k6d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Batch review des PRs RTK par ordre de complexité croissante (XS → S → M → L). Pour chaque PR : vérifie l'état (conflits, CLA, reviews), lit le diff complet, analyse le code en contexte, présente un résumé avec lien + taille + recommandation. Attend validation explicite avant tout merge. Poste des commentaires boldguy-adapt sur les PRs bloquées (conflit, CLA, CHANGES_REQUESTED). Args: "triage" pour lancer un triage complet avant la review. "from:<num>" pour reprendre à partir d'un numéro de PR spécifique.
Steady10 mentions in 2 weeks
195 projects use a version of this
87k33d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Plain text files in a repository that tell a coding agent how the project works: commands to run, conventions to follow and things to avoid. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, cursor rules and skills are the common kinds.
CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md?
CLAUDE.md is read by Claude Code. AGENTS.md is an open format that Codex, Cursor and other agents read. Many projects keep one and point the other at it.
What is a skill?
A folder with a SKILL.md that describes one capability, such as filling PDFs or reviewing code. The agent loads it only when the task calls for it.
Can I search my own team's files too?
Your agents already can, over MCP, limited to the files you're allowed to read. Searching them from this page is coming.