agentleFS
ztnkvztnkv/personal-operating-system/.claude/skills/lists/SKILL.md

lists

Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Works with the user's lists in lists/ — tasks, films, books, games, workouts, etc. Detects the intent to operate on a list ("add a task", "add to films-to-watch", "mark as done", "show my book list") and picks the right list using the descriptions and trigger patterns in lists/index.md. Supports — add (append item), check (mark done), uncheck, remove, show (display the list), create (create a new list, only after confirming with the user). If the requested list is not in lists/index.md, never creates it silently — always confirms creation with the user.

  • Commits and pushes

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions3 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 3

    1. aspose-words/agentic-net-examples★ 4same name
    2. moasq/ios-dev-agent★ 4same name
    3. eddmann/jeeves★ 2same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not confuse with memory: lists are trackable items (to do / watch / read), memory is facts about the user (opinions, habits, goals).

    line 20
  2. Very specific:

    Read lists/index.md in full.

    line 26
  3. Very specific:

    If the list has a specific format (inline metadata, described in lists/index.md) — follow it.

    line 54
  4. Distinctive:

    If multiple matches — ask which one.

    line 59
  5. Distinctive:

    Read the file and show its contents (you can filter by status — open only / done only).

    line 68
  6. Distinctive:

    Ask the user for: filename, human-readable title, description (what this list is for), trigger patterns (which words/verbs should map to …

    line 74
  7. Very specific:

    Create lists/<name>.md with a frontmatter block, a # <title> heading, and an empty bullet list.

    line 75
  8. Very specific:

    Add an entry in lists/index.md under ## Lists following the template in the index.

    line 76
  9. Very specific:

    After any operation that changed file(s) in lists/ (add, check, uncheck, remove, create) — one atomic commit and push:

    line 80
  10. Very specific:

    If nothing changed (operation was show) — do not commit.

    line 91
  11. Distinctive:

    Never create a list silently: If the user wants to add an item to a non-existent list — first confirm creating the list, then add the item.

    line 95
  12. Distinctive:

    Do not invent triggers: when creating a new list — ask the user.

    line 96
  13. Distinctive:

    When removing an item — confirm (an extra click is cheaper than lost data).

    line 97
  14. Very specific:

    After the operation — before closing the topic — check whether new facts about the user surfaced in the dialog (habits, patterns, …

    line 102

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

lists

Works with the lists in lists/.

When to invoke

Any user message that carries the intent of working with a list:

  • "add task X", "throw it on my to-do" → append to a tasks list.
  • "in films-to-watch — Dune Part Two" → append to the films list.
  • "mark Y as done" → check off an item.
  • "show my books" → display a list.
  • "add exercise X to my workout" → append to a workout list.

Do not confuse with memory: lists are trackable items (to do / watch / read), memory is facts about the user (opinions, habits, goals).

Algorithm

Step 1. Read the lists index

Read lists/index.md in full. It contains the description and trigger patterns of every list.

Step 2. Identify the target list

Behavior depends on how clear the intent is:

  • User named the list explicitly ("add X to films", "put Y in tasks") → use it without re-asking.
  • Unambiguous trigger match on exactly one list → use it and report it: "Added to tasks. Move it?" Undo must be cheap (one command).
  • Multiple lists fit or no list fits confidently → ask: "Tasks or ideas?" Do not guess.

Step 3. Identify the operation

  • add — append an item.
  • check / uncheck — mark done / unmark.
  • remove — drop the item entirely (it was added by mistake).
  • show — display the list (or part of it).
  • create — create a new list (see below).

Step 4. Apply the operation

add

  1. Open the list file.
  2. Find the bullet list. If there isn't one — create a # <name> heading and start a bullet list.
  3. Append a line:
    - <item>
  4. If the list has a specific format (inline metadata, described in lists/index.md) — follow it.

check / uncheck

  1. Find the line by item text.
  2. If multiple matches — ask which one.
  3. check — remove the line (item done). uncheck — restore the line back into the list.

remove

Confirm the deletion with the user, then remove the line.

show

Read the file and show its contents (you can filter by status — open only / done only).

create — create a new list

Never create silently.

  1. Ask the user for: filename, human-readable title, description (what this list is for), trigger patterns (which words/verbs should map to this list), format notes (any inline metadata on items).
  2. Create lists/<name>.md with a frontmatter block, a # <title> heading, and an empty bullet list.
  3. Add an entry in lists/index.md under ## Lists following the template in the index.

Commit + push after modifying operations

After any operation that changed file(s) in lists/ (add, check, uncheck, remove, create) — one atomic commit and push:

  1. git add lists/
  2. Conventional-commits-style message, with no item content or names:
    • add → chore(lists): add item to list
    • check/uncheck → chore(lists): update item status
    • remove → chore(lists): remove item from list
    • create → chore(lists): create new list
    • mixed → chore(lists): update list entries
  3. git push

If nothing changed (operation was show) — do not commit.

Special rules

  • Never create a list silently. If the user wants to add an item to a non-existent list — first confirm creating the list, then add the item.
  • Do not invent triggers when creating a new list — ask the user.
  • When removing an item — confirm (an extra click is cheaper than lost data).
  • Lists are operational data, not memory. Do not record facts in memory just because they showed up in a list (unless the user asks explicitly).

Retro hook after the operation

After the operation — before closing the topic — check whether new facts about the user surfaced in the dialog (habits, patterns, preferences, events). If so — proactively propose memory-retro. Do not wait for the user to ask. Closing silently without this check is a bug.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.