agentleFS
zbruhnkezbruhnke/claude-code-starter/.claude/skills/release-checklist/SKILL.md

release-checklist

Skill16 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Run a final release checklist before shipping. Verifies no TODOs, no debug code, docs updated, tests passing, dependencies justified, and security reviewed.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run through each section systematically.

    line 25
  2. Distinctive:

    Run all test commands from CLAUDE.md:

    line 66
  3. Distinctive:

    Before merging a feature branch

    line 147
  4. Distinctive:

    Before cutting a release tag

    line 148
  5. Distinctive:

    Before deploying to production

    line 149
  6. Distinctive:

    When used as part of a wiggum loop, this checklist runs during Phase 5 (Final Verification).

    line 154

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Release Checklist

A final quality gate before shipping code. This skill runs through everything a senior developer would check before approving a release.

Quick Start

/release-checklist

Or specify a scope:

/release-checklist src/auth/

The Checklist

Run through each section systematically. Any failure blocks the release.

1. Code Completeness

# Search for incomplete code markers
grep -r "TODO\|FIXME\|XXX\|HACK\|WIP" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py" --include="*.go" --include="*.rs" --include="*.rb" --include="*.ex" src/
  • No TODO comments remain
  • No FIXME markers
  • No HACK or XXX notes
  • No WIP (work in progress) code
  • No placeholder implementations (throw new Error('Not implemented'))
  • No commented-out code that should be removed

2. Debug Code Removed

# Search for debug statements
grep -rn "console\.log\|print(\|debugger\|binding\.pry\|byebug\|IEx\.pry" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.py" --include="*.rb" --include="*.ex" src/
  • No console.log in production code (logging libraries OK)
  • No print() statements (Python)
  • No debugger statements
  • No binding.pry / byebug (Ruby)
  • No IEx.pry (Elixir)
  • No hardcoded test data or mock values

3. Documentation Updated

  • README reflects current functionality
  • API documentation matches implementation
  • CHANGELOG has entries for all changes
  • Configuration options documented
  • Breaking changes clearly noted
  • Migration guide if needed

4. Tests Passing

Run all test commands from CLAUDE.md:

# Example - adapt to your project
npm test        # or pytest, go test, etc.
npm run lint    # or ruff, golangci-lint, etc.
npm run typecheck  # or mypy, tsc, etc.
npm run build   # verify it compiles
  • All unit tests pass
  • All integration tests pass
  • Lint checks pass (no errors)
  • Type checks pass (no errors)
  • Build succeeds

5. Dependencies Justified

For any new dependencies added:

  • Each dependency has a clear reason for inclusion
  • Licenses are compatible (MIT, Apache, BSD, etc.)
  • Packages are actively maintained
  • No known security vulnerabilities
  • Versions are pinned appropriately
  • Lockfile is committed
# Check for outdated or vulnerable packages
npm audit       # Node.js
pip-audit       # Python
go list -m -u all  # Go
cargo audit     # Rust
bundle audit    # Ruby
mix deps.audit  # Elixir (with mix_audit)

6. Security Review

  • No hardcoded secrets, keys, or tokens
  • Input validation on all external data
  • SQL queries use parameterized statements
  • User content is escaped before rendering
  • Authentication/authorization enforced
  • Sensitive data not logged
  • Error messages don't leak internals

7. Production Readiness

  • Structured logging (not print statements)
  • Errors categorized appropriately
  • Health check endpoint works (if applicable)
  • Graceful shutdown handling
  • Environment-specific config externalized
  • No hardcoded URLs or environment assumptions

Output Format

## Release Checklist Results

### Passed
- [x] No TODO/FIXME markers
- [x] No debug statements
- [x] Tests passing
- [x] Lint passing
- [x] Build succeeds

### Failed
- [ ] CHANGELOG not updated (missing entry for new auth feature)
- [ ] Found console.log at src/api/users.ts:45

### Warnings
- [ ] New dependency 'lodash' added - verify it's needed (could use native methods)

### Verdict
**BLOCKED** - Fix the failures above before releasing.

When to Use

  • Before merging a feature branch
  • Before cutting a release tag
  • Before deploying to production
  • As the final step in a wiggum loop

Integration with Wiggum

When used as part of a wiggum loop, this checklist runs during Phase 5 (Final Verification). All items must pass before the loop can complete.

Remember

This checklist exists because senior developers do these checks naturally. Making them explicit ensures nothing slips through, especially in automated workflows.

If any item fails, the release is blocked. Fix the issue and run the checklist again.

Download now (ZIP)

  • Other versions31 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 31

    1. Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
    2. maximhq/bifrost★ 9.3ksame name
    3. meganz/android★ 1.9ksame name
    4. tsukumijima/KonomiTV★ 1.1ksame name
    5. erikdarlingdata/PerformanceMonitor★ 526same name
    6. nkarasiak/qgis-mcp★ 364same name
    7. pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
    8. striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 93same name
    9. tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 71same name
    10. cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name

    21 more not listed

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Used alongsideProjects with it also use soak-test, team-live-ops and 10 more.

    Other files people use alongside this one.

    Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
    • lilangMaxSkill

      soak-test

      Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.

      Also in 9 projects that use this

    • lilangMaxSkill

      team-live-ops

      Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.

      Also in 9 projects that use this

    • CoralGameSkill

      playtest-report

      Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.

      Also in 12 projects that use this

    • CoralGameSkill

      team-polish

      Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.

      Also in 14 projects that use this

    • +4 more from lilangMax
    • +4 more from CoralGame
  • In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.