jira
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Draft only, not yet implemented. Future companion utility skill for Jira-backed repos, intended to eventually fetch story details, acceptance criteria, links, and workflow metadata through an MCP or CLI interface.
62 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- HAOYI99/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sergeiwallace/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- icarloscornejo/doertheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- Integralist/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use meet, monday and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
kv0906Skillmeet
Process meeting notes into structured notes with extracted decisions, blockers, and action items. Use for "/meet project type title" then paste notes.
Also in 3 projects that use this
er1chuSkillmonday
Full Monday morning setup. Creates week folder, pulls carry-forward, and generates briefing in one pass. Use on Monday mornings or when the user says "monday", "start my week", or "monday morning".
Also in 3 projects that use this
refly-aiSkillhubspot
Integrate with HubSpot for CRM management. Use when you need to: (1) manage contacts and deals, (2) track sales pipelines, or (3) automate marketing and CRM workflows.
Also in 4 projects that use this
koderoverSkilljenkins
Jenkins CI/CD 操作。用于:(1) 触发 Jenkins 任务构建 (2) 查询任务状态和构建历史 (3) 获取构建日志 (4) 操作 Jenkins 节点和配置
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkilldatadog
Query live Datadog telemetry (logs, metrics, traces, spans, monitors, incidents, dashboards, services, hosts) through Datadog's Pup CLI. Use when users ask to investigate production behavior in Datadog, including searching logs, checking monitor status, inspecting traces or spans, looking up incidents, finding services, or correlating metrics. Do not use it for Sentry issues, repository/source-code work, or ticketing.
Also in 3 projects that use this
refly-aiSkillasana
Integrate with Asana for task management. Use when you need to: (1) create and manage Asana tasks, (2) organize project work, or (3) automate team task tracking workflows.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions62 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 62
- oracle/graalpython★ 1.7ksame name
- microsoft/hve-core★ 1.6ksame name
- SonarSource/SonarJS★ 1.3ksame name
- mongodb/docs★ 779same name
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow★ 192same name
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harness★ 192same name
- magnus919/agent-skills★ 172same name
- kv0906/pm-kit★ 138same name
- oprogramadorreal/optimus-claude★ 75same name
- grandcamel/JIRA-Assistant-Skills★ 47same name
52 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- architecture-doc-builderSkill
- confluenceSkill
- conformanceSkill
- doc-checkSkill
- feature-doc-builderSkill
- gh-issueSkill
- gh-stackSkill
- gh-wikiSkill
- handoffSkill
- pr-builderSkill
- proposal-builderSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- psqlSkill
- qa-testingSkill
- spec-builderSkill
- spec-drivenSkill
- sqlcmdSkill
- standard-builderSkill
- worktreeSkill
- zazz-boardSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 56 edited versions we read keep these.
17
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Do not present this skill as live Jira connectivity.
- Distinctive: line 14
Do not claim that Jira lookups, ticket sync, or issue validation have actually occurred through this skill.
- Distinctive: line 16
If a task needs Jira context today:
- Distinctive: line 18
Use AGENTS.md as the source of truth for repo-specific settings such as tracking system, project-code conventions, and Jira workflow rules.
- Distinctive: line 19
Ask the user for the Jira issue key, URL, acceptance criteria, or related story details when they are not already available in repo docs.
- Distinctive: line 20
Use the user-provided or repo-provided Jira information as context for specification, QA, PR drafting, or execution.
- Distinctive: line 58
Treat this skill as a roadmap marker, not an executable integration.
- Distinctive: line 59
Do not invent Jira endpoints, auth flows, or commands.
- Distinctive: line 60
Do not imply that Jira data can be fetched automatically through this skill yet.
- Distinctive: line 61
If a repo uses Jira, ask the user for the authoritative Jira reference when it is required and unavailable.
- Very specific: line 62
If an automation-driven agent such as an agent running qa-testing needs Jira context, use repo guidance plus user-provided Jira details as …
- Distinctive: line 63
If repo conventions later define a real Jira integration path, update this skill and any related skill extensions to match that …
- Distinctive: line 67
When this skill is implemented, it should likely follow the same broad methodology pattern as other companion utility skills:
- Distinctive: line 69
Use repo guidance first, with AGENTS.md as the source of truth for repo-specific settings.
- Distinctive: line 71
Use a stable agent-facing interface rather than embedding ad hoc HTTP requests in every skill.
- Distinctive: line 78
no live Jira behavior
- Distinctive: line 81
no required environment variables yet
- Distinctive: line 82
no guarantee of future field names or route shapes
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 56 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Jira Skill
Draft Status
This skill is a draft placeholder for the methodology. It is not implemented yet.
Do not present this skill as live Jira connectivity. Do not claim that Jira lookups, ticket sync, or issue validation have actually occurred through this skill.
If a task needs Jira context today:
- Use
AGENTS.mdas the source of truth for repo-specific settings such as tracking system, project-code conventions, and Jira workflow rules. Read it if that context is not already available, along with any skill extension that declares Jira conventions. - Ask the user for the Jira issue key, URL, acceptance criteria, or related story details when they are not already available in repo docs.
- Use the user-provided or repo-provided Jira information as context for specification, QA, PR drafting, or execution.
- Clearly distinguish provided facts from anything still missing.
Operating Modes
This draft skill is intended for two future usage patterns:
- Interactive support for a human-in-the-loop agent that needs Jira context during specification, QA review, PR drafting, or execution.
- Companion utility support for automation-driven agents, including an agent running the
qa-testingskill, that need authoritative Jira issue context to validate acceptance criteria, confirm scope, or anchor reviewer evidence.
Today, both modes still rely on repo guidance and user-provided Jira context because live integration is not implemented yet.
The important distinction is that this skill is not only for conversational lookup. It is also meant to inform downstream agents such as an agent running qa-testing, pr-builder, spec-builder, or pr-review.
Intended Future Role
This skill is expected to become the Jira counterpart to zazz-board for repos that use Jira as the authoritative issue-management system.
Future responsibilities may include:
- fetching Jira issue summaries, descriptions, and acceptance criteria
- retrieving issue URLs, statuses, assignees, and workflow metadata
- resolving related parent/child issue context when specification or review depends on it
- providing authoritative PR-facing Jira references for skills such as
pr-builder - helping
spec-builder,pr-builder,pr-review, and an agent runningqa-testingvalidate that work remains aligned with the governing Jira issue - informing automation-driven QA-agent flows with authoritative Jira acceptance criteria and issue metadata
Intended Interface Direction
The methodology expects this to be implemented later through one of these approaches:
- an MCP-backed Jira integration
- a CLI-first adapter that agents can call consistently
The final implementation path is not decided in this draft. Until that exists, this skill is documentation-only.
Usage Rules For Now
- Treat this skill as a roadmap marker, not an executable integration.
- Do not invent Jira endpoints, auth flows, or commands.
- Do not imply that Jira data can be fetched automatically through this skill yet.
- If a repo uses Jira, ask the user for the authoritative Jira reference when it is required and unavailable.
- If an automation-driven agent such as an agent running
qa-testingneeds Jira context, use repo guidance plus user-provided Jira details as the current fallback input. - If repo conventions later define a real Jira integration path, update this skill and any related skill extensions to match that implementation.
Future Integration Contract
When this skill is implemented, it should likely follow the same broad methodology pattern as other companion utility skills:
- Use repo guidance first, with
AGENTS.mdas the source of truth for repo-specific settings. - Resolve project-specific Jira conventions and authentication source.
- Use a stable agent-facing interface rather than embedding ad hoc HTTP requests in every skill.
- Return authoritative issue context for downstream skills.
- Make it easy for other skills to distinguish verified Jira data from user-supplied fallback context.
- Support both interactive agent use and automation-driven companion use without changing the source-of-truth model.
Non-Goals In This Draft
- no live Jira behavior
- no bundled scripts
- no auth instructions
- no required environment variables yet
- no guarantee of future field names or route shapes
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

