engflow-handoff
Skill0 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub
Transfer essential context between sessions or resume from a handoff. Reference existing artifacts and preserve only what the next session cannot reliably recover. Use on explicit user request.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- diagram-aestheticsSkill
- engflow-clarifySkill
- engflow-code-reviewSkill
- engflow-designSkill
- engflow-implementSkill
- engflow-planSkill
- engflow-pocSkill
- engflow-refactor-assessSkill
- engflow-researchSkill
- engflow-specifySkill
- engflow-tasksSkill
- semver-bumpSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 13
No repository, workflow or other Skill is required, including for non-Engflow work.
- Very specific: line 14
When a plan exists, reference it.
- Distinctive: line 15
Do not automatically invoke other Skills or expand their permissions.
- Distinctive: line 49
Before delivery, check whether the handoff plus accessible sources is sufficient for continuation.
- Distinctive: line 58
Never overwrite an existing file.
- Distinctive: line 64
If saving fails, report that no file was saved and return the content conversationally.
- Distinctive: line 70
Read the handoff and needed sources.
- Distinctive: line 77
If liveness/effects remain unknown, report the blocked action and needed check.
- Distinctive: line 79
Do not rewrite the handoff merely because it was read.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Engflow Handoff
Enable a fresh session to continue without losing essential context or duplicating accessible records. Use on explicit handoff, save-for-next-session or resume request; status questions and context pressure alone do not invoke this Skill.
No repository, workflow or other Skill is required, including for non-Engflow work.
When a plan exists, reference it; engflow-implement can resume without a handoff.
Do not automatically invoke other Skills or expand their permissions.
Prepare
Establish the next objective and where work stopped. Ask only when ambiguity materially changes the handoff. Inspect relevant artifacts and reference actual paths or URLs with their purpose, rather than copying recoverable content.
Preserve essential context not reliably recoverable from those sources:
- User intent, constraints, decisions, rationale and rejected alternatives.
- Findings, blockers, failed approaches and pending questions or approval gates.
- Accepted changes awaiting source updates: affected paths, supplied approval evidence and next sync action. Reference an existing record rather than copy it.
- Outstanding operations whose handles, effects or ownership may be lost between sessions, following the runtime-state guidance below.
Distinguish observations and confirmed decisions from proposals and assumptions; silence is not approval. When conversation is the primary source, preserve its load-bearing detail, not the entire transcript. State the next concrete action and essential prerequisites; leave routine environment discovery to the next agent.
Runtime state that cannot be rediscovered reliably
For an outstanding command, worker, migration or experiment, preserve its handle and environment, scope/possible writes, last observed liveness with observation context, known or uncertain side effects, and the next safe check. Include any exclusive write grant or retry restriction. Never invent handles or fresh status.
A timeout or lost session does not prove termination. Unknown liveness or uncertain non-idempotent effects block conflicting writes and blind retries, not independent safe work. Reference an existing operation record where sufficient; do not dump logs or build a second process ledger. Preparing a handoff does not authorize cancelling, restarting or taking ownership of operations. Honor immediate stop requests.
Before delivery, check whether the handoff plus accessible sources is sufficient for continuation. Mark it partial when critical context or access is missing.
Deliver
Unless a destination is specified, save a unique Markdown file in OS temporary
storage (TMPDIR, then /tmp; TEMP on Windows). Keep the filename convention
handoff-YYYY-MM-DD-<project>-<topic-slug>-<unique-suffix>.md; use general if no
project applies. Use safe ASCII components without separators or sensitive data.
Never overwrite an existing file; choose another suffix on collision. For durable
storage use the user's destination or established convention, not an invented path.
Temporary files are not guaranteed to survive or transfer to another environment.
Report the saved path and a short continuation instruction, not the full file again. Preview or conversation-only requests return the complete handoff without writing. If saving fails, report that no file was saved and return the content conversationally. Redact secrets, including those in paths, URLs or commands. Do not modify referenced artifacts, commit, publish or otherwise change project state while preparing a handoff.
Resume
- Read the handoff and needed sources. Request missing content/access rather than assuming transfer. Inspect-only requests remain read-only.
- Reconcile historical context with current state and supplied approval evidence, including pending source updates. Do not restore obsolete decisions or promote unapproved proposals. A handoff grants no new authority or proof of completion.
- Reconcile outstanding operations before conflicting work. A process ID alone may be stale or reused; verify identity, environment and effects, not just existence. If liveness/effects remain unknown, report the blocked action and needed check.
- Continue the next applicable action only when requested and within current scope. Do not rewrite the handoff merely because it was read.
Optional outline
Adapt to the task; omit empty sections and impose no fixed length:
- Objective: next goal and stopping point.
- Read first: source paths/URLs and their purpose.
- Unpersisted context: essential decisions and evidence unavailable there.
- Outstanding operations: handles, scope, observed/unknown state and safe checks.
- Open questions: blockers, pending approval or source updates.
- Next action: first concrete step after source and environment reconciliation.
- Continuation instruction: a short, ready-to-copy instruction for the next agent.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

