agentleFS
zamushwanizamushwani/biomedical-ai-skills/AGENTS.md

biomedical-ai-skills

AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Validated protocol files for cancer bioinformatics and multi-omics research. This repository is a library of 16 SKILL.md files. Each is a self-contained protocol for one domain: what to run, which parameter values and why, and the mistakes that produce plausible-looking wrong answers. They are plain Markdown with no tool-specific syntax, so any agent can read them directly. Read the relevant skills/<name>/SKILL.md before writing analysis code in that domain, and follow it in place of a default approach. Each file states…

  • Installs packages

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Very specific:

    Read the relevant skills/<name>/SKILL.md before writing analysis code in that domain, and follow it in place of a default approach.

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    Every skill carries a README.md (a gotchas summary) and a tests/ directory validating its claims against public data or live registries.

    line 30
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify before you write: Never state a version number, function signature, argument name or default from memory.

    line 36
  4. Distinctive:

    Never claim a test passes unless you executed it: If it was not run, say "written but not executed" and say why.

    line 39
  5. Distinctive:

    Stage explicit paths: Never git add . — untracked personal files sit in the repository root.

    line 40

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md

Validated protocol files for cancer bioinformatics and multi-omics research.

This repository is a library of 16 SKILL.md files. Each is a self-contained protocol for one domain: what to run, which parameter values and why, and the mistakes that produce plausible-looking wrong answers. They are plain Markdown with no tool-specific syntax, so any agent can read them directly.

Using a skill

Read the relevant skills/<name>/SKILL.md before writing analysis code in that domain, and follow it in place of a default approach. Each file states when it applies in its own ## When to Use This Skill section.

SkillDomain
cancer-multiomicsExpression, mutation, CNV and methylation for TCGA/GEO
immune-deconvolutionImmune and stromal composition from bulk RNA-seq
survival-analysisKaplan-Meier, Cox, competing risks, RMST
single-cell-atlasscRNA-seq from raw counts to annotation and trajectory
spatial-transcriptomicsVisium, Xenium, MERSCOPE, CosMx
foundation-modelsscGPT, Geneformer, UCE, and when a linear baseline wins
meta-analysisSystematic review, pooling, network meta-analysis
variant-annotationVCF normalization, ACMG/AMP, oncogenicity, TMB, MSI
drug-responseDose-response fitting, GDSC/CTRP, sensitivity prediction
clinical-nlpClinical text extraction, assertion, de-identification
computational-pathologyWhole-slide imaging, tiling, MIL, cell segmentation
biomedical-mcpMCP servers over GDC, GEO and biomarker databases
multiomics-integrationMOFA+, SNF, iClusterPlus, DIABLO
checkpoint-biomarkersPD-L1, TMB, MSI, IFN-gamma/TIS/TIDE signatures
radiotherapy-responseDDR profiling, Radiosensitivity Index, GARD
epigenomicsATAC-seq and ChIP-seq, peak calling, differential binding

Every skill carries a README.md (a gotchas summary) and a tests/ directory validating its claims against public data or live registries.

Working in this repository

The rules that govern changes here live in CLAUDE.md and apply to any agent, not only Claude Code. The ones that matter most:

  1. Verify before you write. Never state a version number, function signature, argument name or default from memory. Check it against the registry and the package source before it goes in a file.
  2. Changing a skill means releasing it. A committed but unreleased edit leaves pip install serving stale content.
  3. Never report success from an intermediate signal. A green CI run is not evidence the artifact is correct. Verify the artifact itself.
  4. Never claim a test passes unless you executed it. If it was not run, say "written but not executed" and say why.
  5. Stage explicit paths. Never git add . — untracked personal files sit in the repository root.

Commands

python3 tools/run_benchmarks.py               # run every skill's validation suite
python3 tools/check_portability.py            # verify the skills stay tool-neutral
cd skills/<name>/tests && python run_all.py   # one skill (some use run_all.R)

Layout

skills/<name>/SKILL.md      the protocol
skills/<name>/README.md     gotchas summary
skills/<name>/tests/        validation suite
src/biomedical_ai_skills/   pip package and CLI
tools/                      benchmark and portability runners

A note on portability

The SKILL.md files deliberately contain no agent-specific syntax: no argument placeholders, no file-include directives, no inline shell execution. That is what lets the same file work in Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, Gemini CLI and anything else that reads Markdown. tools/check_portability.py enforces it, so a skill that acquires tool-specific syntax fails the check rather than silently breaking elsewhere.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.