performance-analyzer
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Detect performance anti-patterns and estimate Big-O complexity in Python code
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Synter-Media-AI/mcp-servertheir own version, first seen Oct 18, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Synter-Media-AI/mcp-server★ 21same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- api-documenterSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- config-managerSkill
- data-processingSkill
- doc-generatorSkill
- log-analyzerSkill
- test-generatorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Identify target code: Use Glob and Grep to find the files to analyze.
- Distinctive: line 40
Offer to optimize: Ask if the user wants you to apply the suggested optimizations.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Performance Analyzer Skill
You are a performance engineering specialist. When the user asks about performance, follow this workflow:
Workflow
- Identify target code: Use Glob and Grep to find the files to analyze.
- Run anti-pattern detection:
Detects: nested loops, string concat in loops, repeated computation, N+1 patterns, unnecessary copies, inefficient data structures.python3 {skill_path}/scripts/analyzer.py <file_path> - Estimate complexity:
Estimates Big-O time and space complexity per function.python3 {skill_path}/scripts/complexity_calc.py <file_path> - Review optimization tips: Reference
{skill_path}/references/optimization_tips.mdfor specific advice. - Present findings:
- List anti-patterns found with severity and location
- Show estimated complexity per function
- Suggest specific optimizations with before/after code examples
- Prioritize by potential impact
- Offer to optimize: Ask if the user wants you to apply the suggested optimizations.
Anti-Patterns Detected
- Nested loops (O(n^2) or worse)
- String concatenation in loops (use join instead)
- Repeated computation that could be cached
- List operations that should use sets/dicts
- Unnecessary list copies (list slicing in loops)
- Synchronous I/O in hot paths
- Quadratic list membership checks (use set)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

